Recommended Posts

I suppose there wouldn't be any major obstacle to it. Microsoft will not support FLAC on the Windows Phone platform, probably ever. There's just no point, it's far too fringe a format to waste engineering effort on. Might see WMA Pro Lossless in WP8.

What's funny is I think more people use FLAC then use WMA Pro Lossless. So I don't think it is fringe at all.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594877437
Share on other sites

What's funny is I think more people use FLAC then use WMA Pro Lossless. So I don't think it is fringe at all.

Quite possible.

Still, I wouldn't say that FLAC isn't a fringe codec because it's used more than another obscure fringe codec. WMA PL just has a higher chance of being supported because it's in the WMA family, not because anybody is clamouring to get it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594877439
Share on other sites

FLAC doesn't make sense on a mobile media player anyway, audio quality is to low to make use of it and low storage space makes it leaven less useful.

Especially with windows 7's ability to hardware encode lossless or non supported audio when copied to devices at nearly live data copy speed. Of course this doesn't really work in Zune as far as I'm aware, just for devices that use the win7 device center/manager.

Anyway, my pointis, keep FLAC or whatever lossless codec for archive and for listening upon high end networked media players connected to an actual amp/receiver with proper speakers, and encode in lossy formats in your proffered quality for PMPs.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594877569
Share on other sites

Also if you absoolutely think you need lossless in your PMP, the advantage is that you can convert all your FLAC to wma lossless without quality loss. When it comes to lossless it doesn't matter which format you chose, except of hardware and software support, where wma lossless wins hands down over FLAC anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594877581
Share on other sites

Also if you absoolutely think you need lossless in your PMP, the advantage is that you can convert all your FLAC to wma lossless without quality loss. When it comes to lossless it doesn't matter which format you chose, except of hardware and software support, where wma lossless wins hands down over FLAC anyway.

Sorry but this is absolutely incorrect! This from Hydrogenaudio website.

post-23703-0-14651800-1337549768_thumb.j

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594877617
Share on other sites

Uh, right. Now name all the pmp's that support FLAC, compared to how many support wma. On original firmware. No rock box or mer mods. Plain old original firmware. Using the built in library functions on the device.

FLAC was pretty much only supported on a few high end river devices that where way over priced as cool s they where. While every plays for sure device supported wma, which was everything not iPod pretty much. Today on phones. It's a different matter, but on without using awkward this party players that rules out FLAC as well. And let's get down to actual receivers and amps. There's a lot of them that support all kinds of wma, but no FLAC.

So I'll take that table with a grain of salt.

Also Hving done both wma and FLAC and monkey and many other encodings, I can tell you the encoding speed in that table is plain wrong. Wma breezes through encoding even on slow hardware. But then again, on today's hardware encoding speed is pretty irrelevant anyway. All of these are fast enough it won't matter.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594877665
Share on other sites

I suppose there wouldn't be any major obstacle to it.

Thanks, here's hoping some apps crop up.

Also if you absoolutely think you need lossless in your PMP, the advantage is that you can convert all your FLAC to wma lossless without quality loss. When it comes to lossless it doesn't matter which format you chose, except of hardware and software support, where wma lossless wins hands down over FLAC anyway.

WMA lossless isn't supported either. It may look like it is, but secretly it's converted to mp3 in the background during the transfer. Either that's the OS or the Lumia 800, shrug.

2 ways of verifying this: 1. The size of the file on the phone. 2. The fact that random tmp files are being generated in the Transcoded Files Cache folder.

I'd personally rather keep a single collection rather than double it anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594878595
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's not really a bad plan, stash the audio in WMA Lossless, and it will lossy convert it at sync time in Zune. I don't really want to get into an audiophile argument, but on a phone, I don't think it's really possible to distinguish lossless from 320kbps WMA. And it will murder your storage.

Native WMA Lossless support would be cool, and like I said, might arrive in WP8, but I wouldn't hold your breath. Third party app might do it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594879153
Share on other sites

Ignoring the sensibilities of storing lossless files on a device with limited storage and containing a DAC worth pennies at best?

Even if you can't run libFlac directly on the silicon, the FLAC codec is fairly fast to decode so there's technically nothing stopping someone writing a decoder completely in C# in WP's managed environment. It wouldn't be hardware accelerated or as efficient (since it's running in a managed environment) but if someone can write a h264 decoder in JavaScript, someone can write a FLAC decoder in C#!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594879177
Share on other sites

Whilst I'm not holding my breath for MS to suddenly support FLAC in WP8 (though it would be cool, and if anything a result of Nokia pressure), does anyone know with all the new app capabilities that will be added such as native code, will apps be able to be written to playback FLAC files?

I hope Microsoft'll include Apple Lossless decoding as well, it's Open Source, there's no reason not to.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594879235
Share on other sites

That actually doesn't mean it doesn't infringe on any patents, just that so far no one has cared to bother them about it, and that the codec itself is free to implement from them and that it's developed open source. However as far as patents go, it means nothing. And I think you'd see the patent trolls come out if it where ever officially implemented in a larger system like a major OS.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594882083
Share on other sites

That actually doesn't mean it doesn't infringe on any patents, just that so far no one has cared to bother them about it, and that the codec itself is free to implement from them and that it's developed open source. However as far as patents go, it means nothing. And I think you'd see the patent trolls come out if it where ever officially implemented in a larger system like a major OS.

Like who exactly? Just look at the amount of companies using FLAC: http://flac.sourceforge.net/news.html

You'd think it would have stirred some attention by now if music from the Beetles, Eagles and Metallica is published using it ;) What are they waiting for, they can sue these giant records labels!! Oh wait, they can't.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594882575
Share on other sites

Like who exactly? Just look at the amount of companies using FLAC: http://flac.sourceforge.net/news.html

You'd think it would have stirred some attention by now if music from the Beetles, Eagles and Metallica is published using it ;) What are they waiting for, they can sue these giant records labels!! Oh wait, they can't.

Did we see anyone suing giant record labels for using MP3? Did we see anyone suing Microsoft for using MP3? Yes!

There is a difference.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078027-flac-support/#findComment-594883131
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!