Gaming setup, high-end(budget)


Recommended Posts

Specs :PROCESSOR : CORE I3 2100 @ 3.1GHZ

MOTHERBOARD : ECS H61H2-M2 B3 -

RAM : GENERIC 4GB DDR3 1333MHZ

VIDEO CARD : SAPPHIRE HD 7850

POWERSUPPLY : CORSAIR VX550W / HEC RAPTER II 600W

CASING : Aerocool (VS3 Advanced)

my budget is up to $620(26300 philippine peso-converted to usd)

3. I'll use it for gaming purposes, playing @max settings

4. 19" widescreen LED @1360x768 ; not planning to SLI/Xfire

5. I'm buying this June

6. I'll be overclocking.... overclocking my GPU only.

7. Where? oh i plan to buy in my country, philippines

8. No extra features, the build has it all.

Im planning to downgrade the Wattage of my psu to 430W-460W , will it be capable?

please recommend me some PSU manufacturers so I can base on them.

oh, and one more thing, I'm choosing among these 3 cards : GTX 560 ti, GTX 560 ti 448, HD 6950 and HD 7850 what do you recommend among these 3?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078563-gaming-setup-high-endbudget/
Share on other sites

So what exactly is "high end" ?

I feel stupid for even posting on this thread because I think I just fell for a joke.

Then don't even post on such topic, you're not helping either !

@OP !

Don't compromise on PSU ! use at least 500W PSU !

& you didn't mentioned the Graphic Cards in detail, there's so many varities of HD 7850 & HD 6950,

anyway, check which one is 256Bit with DDR5 memory.

  • Like 2

Go with at least a 500 watt PSU and theGTX 560 Ti 448. You should be fine if you plan on gaming up to 1680 x 1050, although in some games you may have to leave MSAA off; such as BF3. Also I'm not a fan of that motherboard, but I guess it should suite your needs.

So what exactly is "high end" ?

I feel stupid for even posting on this thread because I think I just fell for a joke.

we'll im sorry if my "high-end" doesn't meet your "high-end" standards

it would be better if you helped me out a bit rather than posting useless comments..

thanks for reading my "joke" thread.

Then don't even post on such topic, you're not helping either !

@OP !

Don't compromise on PSU ! use at least 500W PSU !

& you didn't mentioned the Graphic Cards in detail, there's so many varities of HD 7850 & HD 6950,

anyway, check which one is 256Bit with DDR5 memory.

thanks..

and oh... yeah there are many varieties of those cards but i based on the reference cards, the original ones...

sorry,, i forgot to mention that earlier..

thanks for the reply, i appreciate it much.

Go with at least a 500 watt PSU and theGTX 560 Ti 448. You should be fine if you plan on gaming up to 1680 x 1050, although in some games you may have to leave MSAA off; such as BF3. Also I'm not a fan of that motherboard, but I guess it should suite your needs.

that's a relief to hear.. thanks for the reply.

Go with H67 if possible instead of H61 for a motherboard.

Or better yet, Z77.

Also, do give the i5-K (either 2500K or 3570K) serious consideration - while a lot of games don't take advantage of multiple cores, the operating systems definitely do.

Chipsets to *avoid* : P67. Why? Motherboards based on P67 not only cost more than Z68, they also cost more than Z77, which I simply cannot forgive.

I also concur with the poster that suggests GDDR5, at least 1 GB of it, and a 256-bit bus (alternative - 128-bit bus) for a gaming GPU. However, in addition to the nVIdia 550/560, add the AMD HD68xx/78xx to the list as well.

If its possible you can save more money for it itll future proof you alot better. ive put together this, it in english pounds off 1 site. Shopping on multiple sites will give you the best deals.

Gigabyte H61MA-D3V Intel H61 (Socket 1155), ?48, give you 2 sata 6, 2x usb 3 ports and PCIe 3.0

Intel Core i5-3450 3.10GHz (Ivybridge) - ?150

Corsair XMS3 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-10666C9 1333MHz, ?40, its best to go with 8GB over 4GB for games just to make sure your not running out of ram etc

Corsair Builder Series CX 600W V2 '80 Plus' Power Supply - ?53

Aerocool VS-3 Advance Midi Tower Case - ?35, looks quite cool actually :D

MSI HD 7850 Power Edition Twin Frozr IV OC 2048MB - ?220 or

Sapphire HD 7850 2048MB - ?200, Id prolly be more inclined to go with sapphire on a personal peference but like AMD or nividia to different brands. Its mostly personal preference

Cost = ?545 or ?525 pending on gfx card

if i did your specs of

i3 2120, ?92

4Gb ram (OCZ Platinum 77720 timings, only a few pounds more than other ram), ?27

500 watt corsair builder PSU (miinmum you want really) ?45

Total cost, ?466

TYou could save a bit more money by going with the 6950 which are still very good cards

Sapphire HD 6950 OC "Dual Fan Edition" 2048MB - ?150

Total cost on the cheaper system would be ?397

on the more expensive system would be ?475 - ?495 depending on which of the 2 7850's you would go for

You could change your ram to 1600Mhz as some only costs a few pounds more than the 1333Mhz ones, not sure if youll see much difference though

Hope that helps ya

So what exactly is "high end" ?

I feel stupid for even posting on this thread because I think I just fell for a joke.

this is high end depending on where you are in the world. In the phillipines, this computer is 3-4 months salary. It would be the same as you buying a 6,000 dollar pc.

this is high end depending on where you are in the world. In the phillipines, this computer is 3-4 months salary. It would be the same as you buying a 6,000 dollar pc.

High end isn't compared using currencies, it's compared in performance...in general terms. Sure, the cost may make it high end to you, but in terms of technologies available, it isn't high end.

High end gaming machines are Core i7-2600K, GeForce 560Ti and 8GB of RAM or above processor wise in the current age of technology

i would say for a gaming rig high end would be i5-2500k and above seeing as it is widely recognized as the best processor for gaming. the i7's hyperthreading isnt needed for gaming in fact the i5 is under utilized plus it overclocks really well. A high end gaming rig would have some of the latest gfx tech rather than having the best processor you can buy as the games use the GPU far more than the CPU.

Exactly -

I laugh because OP says "high end" yet mentions specs that are budget - and some people are all "well its alot in the Philip..."

I dont care where he is - Core i3 is NOT high end. I am not being ethnocentric to my fat, lazy rich american ideals.

If you'll excuse me I have to go to drop $100 to fill up my SUV...

*Disclaimer - author does not own an SUV & it cost $50 to fill up his car*

I totally agree with the high end comments. You don't want an i3, sure it's a great processor, but it's a core component of the build. Do not cheap out. I would sacrifice a little GPU power for more CPU power, as your monitor is a lower resolution. I would go for the i5 2500 at least, and a GTX 560 (Ti, if possible).

high end is high end true, but to each its different. To some, i5 is a joke.. You call it high end but its garbage low end to weather machines and architectural rendering offices with mainframes, and even pixar graphics production machines. Since this guy is in the phillipines, its high end for him.

high end is high end true, but to each its different. To some, i5 is a joke.. You call it high end but its garbage low end to weather machines and architectural rendering offices with mainframes, and even pixar graphics production machines. Since this guy is in the phillipines, its high end for him.

Hey ---- you sound like that Einstein guy or whatever his name was -- he said something like "its all relative" - :wacko:

the i3-2120 offers the best bang for the buck right now if you ask me as it's only $115-125 and holds up well against some of the higher end CPU's when it comes to gaming abilities.

but basically that CPU should AT LEAST hold out until the next gen consoles arrive as it can comfortably run any game out there right now if paired with a decent GPU.

You don't want an i3, sure it's a great processor, but it's a core component of the build. Do not cheap out. I would sacrifice a little GPU power for more CPU power, as your monitor is a lower resolution. I would go for the i5 2500 at least, and a GTX 560 (Ti, if possible).

as far as games go... i am pretty sure right now it would make more sense to get that CPU (i3-2120) along with a fairly fancy graphics card because i don't think much can max out a i3-2120 CPU as far as games go as from what i been reading it seems like most games right now like a fast dual core more than a slower quad core basically.

only reason to go quad core right now for games is basically down the road when the next gen consoles arrive as i suspect then is when games will start the process of needing quite a bit more power to run well again as it seems lately most CPU's that are not TOO old can still play games on them comfortably and with the i3-2120 being the best dual core CPU out there it should be good for a while especially considering the $$$ you spend on it and by the time it starts struggling to run games you could just upgrade to something better anyways.

plus with it being dual core it's better on power consumption to which is a bonus.

Then don't even post on such topic, you're not helping either !

@OP !

Don't compromise on PSU ! use at least 500W PSU !

& you didn't mentioned the Graphic Cards in detail, there's so many varities of HD 7850 & HD 6950,

anyway, check which one is 256Bit with DDR5 memory.

Why all the "!" ?

you're too high strung. Were you crying when you posted this ? :unsure:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      594
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!