Recommended Posts

Why would you be seeing a SSL cert when opening up mail from paypal? I just looked at some email from paypal in in gmail, invoices and such for use of it. Official stuff, and there is no cert from paypal that I can see in there.

Are you saying the email was signed with a vmware cert?

Could you give some more details of how and when your seeing this. What are the details of the cert, next tab over on the top

Why would you be seeing a SSL cert when opening up mail from paypal? I just looked at some email from paypal in in gmail, invoices and such for use of it. Official stuff, and there is no cert from paypal that I can see in there.

Are you saying the email was signed with a vmware cert?

Could you give some more details of how and when your seeing this.

I bought a few things from ebay using Paypal, and I receive my receipts to my live.co.uk email address using the Windows Live Mail client

When I click on the paypal email to read it, a certificate error window pops up asking if I want to continue, cancel, or have a look at the certificate

If I click continue I can view the paypal email, if I click to look at the certificate, the window I posted above appears

but live mail is a online service is it not? So that would cert for any email on their server?

I will have to file up the live mail client and check it out.. I have a live.com address, but just view it online - I don't use the client.

Have to run for work, but will check on it later today. What does it show in that details section.. Might be able to get a few clues to where the cert is coming from.

but live mail is a online service is it not? So that would cert for any email on their server?

I will have to file up the live mail client and check it out.. I have a live.com address, but just view it online - I don't use the client.

Have to run for work, but will check on it later today. What does it show in that details section.. Might be able to get a few clues to where the cert is coming from.

You can use it offline, bit like Outlook I suppose but I always use it online. I've never seen this problem before on any email in this client.

The last time I can remember getting certificate errors was when I had a weird combo of proxies and AP's and a 3G Dongle connection, and IE would give Cert errors on nearly every webpage, but that was on a different machine in a different life

This machine is wired to dd-wrt router > openreach modem > phone socket.

-----

Been looking through the message source details and came across this at the bottom

https://102.112.2O7....123456?pageNam=e=3Dsystem_email_PP1003=22

When I googled the first IP part of the URL I found some posts with people complaining that that URL was causing their Outlook to crash with PP emails

Another thing I noticed is the images on the PP emails are broken with red X in their place.

Can't see anything in there about certificates, here is some of the sender info if it helps (Removed things that looked sensitive to PP)

Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; sender-id=pass (sender IP is 173.0.84.227) [email protected]; dkim=pass header.d=paypal.co.uk; x-hmca=pass
X-SID-PRA: [email protected]
X-SID-Result: Pass
X-DKIM-Result: Pass
X-Message-Status: p:1:n
X-AUTH-Result: PASS

Received: from mx0.slc.paypal.com ([173.0.84.227]) by BAY0-MC4-F12.Bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4900);
	 Mon, 21 May 2012 01:06:20 -0700
DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
	s=dkim; d=paypal.com;
	h=DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:Message-Id:Sender:Subject:X-MaxCode-Template:To:From:X-Email-Type-Id:X-XPT-XSL-Name:Content-Type:MIME-Version;


DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=paypal.co.uk; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	q=dns/txt; [email protected];;

but that https link is a link right, not a source of some image or anything?

I don't show anything wrong with that cert

post-14624-0-97449700-1337615179.jpg

So there must be something in that email that is calling a https link for say an image in that message, so when you try and load the image that cert is causing the popup because you don't trust the CA.

When you look at the source of the message, look for all the img tags, are they using https in the location of the image, if so try to open them up on your own and check out the cert used.

So this message is offline right? So something in that message must be trying to access something via https that is not quite right. Look in the message for anything with https url in it.. But it happens when you just open the email right, your not following some link in it?

If your using a proxy, then sure that could cause a problem with cert, if they are trying to do a mitm on your ssl traffic and they replace all the certs with the one from the proxy. But if that was the case you would think any https thing you followed would be causing you the warning.

But sure if you don't allow the cert to be used, and image is being loaded via https - then it couldn't load and you would get a red x vs the image.

Found this image URL in the source

<a href=3D=22https://www.paypal.com/uk=22><img =

src=3D=22http://images.paypal.com/en_US/i/logo/logo_emailheader_113wx46h.gi=

f=22 border=3D=220=22 alt=3D=22PayPal=22/></a>

I wonder if the last part of that URL should be .gif - the URL works if I make it so.

I'm not running a proxy, I have a direct BB connection.

The message is offline now yea, but the certificate error only happens when I open the message for the first time, even though I have not installed the Cert, once I hit Continue it never questions it again until I receive a new PP email

I think your right about the image URL being the cause. Because it is https: and the URL is broken its confusing it somewhat, but why it would even mention vmware is confusing

so show that url as

http://images.paypal.com/en_US/i/logo/logo_emailheader_113wx46h.gi=

that image url is not https from what you posted. The link off click the image would be https://www.paypal.com which I show as a valid cert signed by verisign.

yeah gi seems wrong to me as well.. But from the code you listed that image would not be over a https connection.

Can you sniff your traffic while you create the problem, so we can see where its going to get this cert. Happy to look at the sniff if you send to me in PM, if you don't feel like posting public that sort of info.

I would be VERY curious as well to what is causing this - I would be worried about attempts to mitm your ssl traffic, etc! More than likely its just a goof up on something.. But until you track down what is causing it, it is very wise to be concerned.

so show that url as

http://images.paypal.com/en_US/i/logo/logo_emailheader_113wx46h.gi=

that image url is not https from what you posted. The link off click the image would be https://www.paypal.com which I show as a valid cert signed by verisign.

yeah gi seems wrong to me as well.. But from the code you listed that image would not be over a https connection.

Can you sniff your traffic while you create the problem, so we can see where its going to get this cert. Happy to look at the sniff if you send to me in PM, if you don't feel like posting public that sort of info.

I would be VERY curious as well to what is causing this - I would be worried about attempts to mitm your ssl traffic, etc! More than likely its just a goof up on something.. But until you track down what is causing it, it is very wise to be concerned.

What would you use to sniff? Wireshark ?

I'll stick a sticky note on my desktop to remind me about it because I don't have any PP emails on their way atm, and I've already opened and hit continue on the ones I have received so far so they won't bring it up again

I've tried marking them as unread then opening them again but it doesn't have any effect.

Any other site, I wouldn't really have thought about it, but seeing vmware certs on a PP email rang alarm bells

Adding the correct .gif in place of the .gi shows the correct PP logo, and as the images are broken on the email I say that is at least one problem it has.

http://images.paypal.com/en_US/i/logo/logo_emailheader_113wx46h.gif

yeah bad coding in the email, and bad ssl certs -- would ring alarm bells for me as well.

yeah wireshark is what I would use.

You have found an interesting issue -- very curious to what it turns out to be!

but that https link is a link right, not a source of some image or anything?

Here is the full footer with that URL included.

&lt;span =
class=3D=22xptFooter=22&gt;Copyright =A9 1999-2012 PayPal. All rights =
reserved.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PayPal (Europe) S.=E0 r.l. et Cie, =
S.C.A.&lt;br/&gt;Soci=E9t=E9 en Commandite par Actions&lt;br/&gt;Registered Office: =
5th Floor 22-24 Boulevard Royal L-2449, Luxembourg&lt;br/&gt;RCS Luxembourg B =
118 349&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style=3D=22color: =23333333;font-family: =
arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11px;=22&gt;&lt;span class=3D=22xptFooter =
ppid=22&gt;PayPal Email ID PP843&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img height=3D=221=22 =
width=3D=221=22 =
src=3D=22https://102.112.2O7.net/b/ss/paypalglobal/1/G.4--NS/123456?pageNam=
e=3Dsystem_email_PP843=22 border=3D=220=22 =
alt=3D=22=22/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;=

Comparing the source from the Client vs Hotmail server, the source is different.

The above is from the WLMail Client

This below is from the online server

at the bottom of any page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copyright =A9 2012 =
PayPal. All rights reserved.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PayPal (Europe) S.=E0 r.l. et Cie, =
S.C.A.&lt;br/&gt;Soci=E9t=E9 en Commandite par Actions&lt;br/&gt;Registered office: =
22-24 Boulevard Royal, L-2449 Luxemburg&lt;br/&gt;RCS Luxemburg B 118 =
349&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img height=3D=221=22 width=3D=221=22 =
src=3D=22https://102.112.2O7.net/b/ss/paypalglobal/1/G.4--NS/123456?pageNam=
e=3Dsystem_email_PP1003=22 border=3D=220=22 alt=3D=22=22/&gt;&lt;p =
class=3D=22xptFooter ppid=22&gt;PayPal Email ID =
PP1003&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;=

I've copied from around the same point to the very end of the email, and you can see even before the Copyright section on the first line it is already different, along with quite a bit more of it

Could the client be causing the problem ?

The valid window of March 13 means it's a recent change, and secondly, I don't think many websites do a one-year cert.

BUT... do you have another computer than you can open the same email in the same way as you are right now and see if it prompts the same? Preferably a computer on the same network, same OS, same mail client.

I'm wondering if it isn't a man in the middle attack. I did an extensive lab on it in one of my classes and it looked similar to this. Just wish certs showed what was trying to access that server.

A client should not be changing the source of the email that is for damn sure -- something wrong there!!!

You sure your not just looking at different emails? One says ID is PP1003, other says PP843 -- not sure why footers would be different if same time frame, same type of email. From those numbers does not look like your looking at the same email. Could you have a cache issue?

Pretty sure they were the same emails, I checked the item I was getting the receipt for along with the time of the emails (My mistake, the PP1003 is another PP email, I got them both more or less at the same time and checked the source of the one above in haste)

But an update, I ordered another couple of things, and got my receipts for them from PP again, this time running wireshark prepared for the certificate error, and surprise surprise because I was ready for it this time, I got no errors, the emails opened fine without complaints.

Between the original errors and these ones I had to move the router and disconnect the power to get the cable where I needed it.

Router is running DD-WRT, possibly it had cached something causing the problem that the reboot cleared ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!