Recommended Posts

Note to Self: Siri Not Just Working for Me, Working Full-Time for Apple, Too

It came as a surprise to some folks at a recent SXSW talk that Apple?s Siri ?personal assistant? isn?t just working for us, it?s working full-time for Apple too by sending lots of our personal voice and user info to Apple to stockpile in its databases. Take a peek at Siri?s privacy policy (which, by the way, is pretty difficult to find) and you?ll realize what?s happening behind the scenes.

What info of yours is being collected and how is it being used? When you use Siri, it?s sending your ?Voice Input Data? and ?User Data? to Apple to be used for a variety of purposes.

Voice Input Data is all the types of data associated with your verbal commands and may also include audio recordings, transcripts of what you said, and related diagnostic data. Apple says this Voice Input Data is being used to process your request and to help Siri better recognize your commands, but it's additionally being used ?generally to improve the overall accuracy and performance of Siri and other Apple products and services.?

Siri also collects ?User Data? that it says gives it more context for your commands, like what you mean by ?Call Dad.? This information can be pretty wide-ranging:

  • The names of your address book contacts, their nicknames, and their relationship with you (for example, ?my dad?, or ?work?)
  • Your first name and nickname
  • Labels you assign to your email accounts (for example, ?My Home Email?)
  • Names of songs and playlists in your collection

This data can be really personal, like if you ask Siri, "where is the nearest abortion clinic?" And once Voice Input Data and User Data is collected, Apple reserves the right to share it with ?Apple?s partners who are providing related services to Apple.?

Not sure that Siri is worth the serious data it?s collecting and how it might end up getting used? Rather live without Siri? Here?s how to opt out and stop your voice data and user data from continuing to be sent to Apple.

Opting out of Siri

  • Tap Settings > General > Siri.
  • Slide the Siri option to "off."

Once you turn off Siri, Apple?s privacy policy says it will delete User Data and any recent Voice Input Data. Though older Voice Input Data that has been already ?disassociated? from you and your device may linger for an undisclosed period of time to ?improve Siri and other Apple products and services.?

https://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/note_to_self_siri_not_just_working_for_me,_working_full-time_for_apple,_too.shtml

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1079147-siri-you-bad-boy/
Share on other sites

So who cares? So Apple wants to have our voice input to feed Siri's intelligence database. Who cares. Google has been doing it for years. Everytime you type a search inquiry on Google guess what? They got you!. Facebook has been doing it for years too. Once you open a FB account guess what? You're screwed because everything you upload, type or put on your FB page, stays at FB, even after you close your account so there. Enjoy your privacy.

If you want privacy, cancel everything you have that is connected to internet or wireless... and stay in amish world which they do not have telephones, cars, smartphones, etc...

Simple.

If you have nothing to hide, then you do NOT have to worry about that. If you hate this new privacy policy, then stay off the internet and mobile devices.

Hmm, there's a slight difference. Google (and Bing, Facecrack, Twatter and alike, just to be fair) provides (most of) its consumer services for free, as in "you're the one being sold". Siri is not free, one has to buy Apple's stuff to use it, and, as it turns out, you're still being sold. Then again, that's nothing out of the ordinary regarding the commitment of quite a few (or even most) Appletards.

And this is a surprise to people? The only real way to stay completely private with any service that accesses the internet is to simply not use it. I don't like Apple by any means but this is just another example of living in the age of technical paranoia.

Oh no... Apple is trying to better its services by taking the questions asked without answer and coming up with answers for future use. Terrible apple, how dare you try to better yourself!

/sarcasm

Really, who cares? If you don't like companies using your data to better their service, disconnect from the Internet.

Oh no... Apple is trying to better its services by taking the questions asked without answer and coming up with answers for future use. Terrible apple, how dare you try to better yourself!

/sarcasm

Really, who cares? If you don't like companies using your data to better their service, disconnect from the Internet.

Really? Who cares? Apparently not you.

In other words:

You're okay with your voice being recorded, your queries being correlated and indexed, and Apple... as well as their 'anonymous' business partners... having access to that data?

Okay.

And you're okay with them knowing who you are?

Okay.

You're okay with your voice being recorded, your queries being correlated and indexed, and Apple... as well as their 'anonymous' business partners... having access to that data?

Uh, yes? It's all anonymous. And nowhere does it say anything about business partners.

We've known from the beginning that this is the way it works. You say something to Siri, it checks with Apple's servers, interprets what you said, and sends back a response. Same way Google does voice recognition. And not really that big of a deal anyway.

Uh, yes? It's all anonymous. And nowhere does it say anything about business partners.

We've known from the beginning that this is the way it works. You say something to Siri, it checks with Apple's servers, interprets what you said, and sends back a response. Same way Google does voice recognition. And not really that big of a deal anyway.

How can it be anonymous while still knowing who your father is? That statement doesn't make sense...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!