Whats a good cost vs performance Nvidia card to get?


Recommended Posts

I like EVGA, but BFG is good as well. I had an MSI card die after a few months of use. Have not used Zotac or Gigabyte vid cards so I can't comment on them.

http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814130604

For $229, that's a pretty good deal.

EDIT: EVGA is the only one that I know of to offer a lifetime warranty.

For that price, you could get a 480gtx which is faster than a 560ti even though it's older: http://www.newegg.co...0759&Tpk=480gtx

I bought one when it first came out at $500 and the only complaint I have is that it is fairly loud under load, but it is a very fast videocard.

For that price, you could get a 480gtx which is faster than a 560ti even though it's older: http://www.newegg.co...0759&Tpk=480gtx

I bought one when it first came out at $500 and the only complaint I have is that it is fairly loud under load, but it is a very fast videocard.

That needs a beefy PSU. 6 and 8 pin power connection.

For that price, you could get a 480gtx which is faster than a 560ti even though it's older: http://www.newegg.co...0759&Tpk=480gtx

I bought one when it first came out at $500 and the only complaint I have is that it is fairly loud under load, but it is a very fast videocard.

No no, don't get a GTX 480. It's old technology that sucks a tonnnn of power and runs really hot. Obviously it's a good card since it's the _80 series, but it's not really worth it compared to the modern 5xx or 6xx series.

It all really depends on budget.

If you want to be in the $100 (USD) range, then the GTX 460 is one of the best ones to get and it has mad overclocking potential.

If the budget is in the $200 range, then the GX 560 Ti is a great card.

And if budget is no matter, then the GTX 670 is the best value card at the moment.

I've had bad experiences with ATI, so I don't tend to care for what they offer, but I'm sure they have a comparable card to each of those Nvidia ones.

No no, don't get a GTX 480. It's old technology that sucks a tonnnn of power and runs really hot. Obviously it's a good card since it's the _80 series, but it's not really worth it compared to the modern 4xx or 5xx series.

It all really depends on budget.

If you want to be in the $100 (USD) range, then the GTX 460 is one of the best ones to get and it has mad overclocking potential.

If the budget is in the $200 range, then the GX 560 Ti is a great card.

And if budget is no matter, then the GTX 670 is the best value card at the moment.

I've had bad experiences with ATI, so I don't tend to care for what they offer, but I'm sure they have a comparable card to each of those Nvidia ones.

Did you mean the current 500 and 600 series?

I agree the 480gtx is a power sucking beast and runs pretty hot, and the insanely loud fan can be annoying at times, but I don't have decent speakers to begin with for my desktop to help cover the noise. The heat issue can be solved by running nvinspector, so my card is usually sitting at 45 degrees when browsing around the internet or whatever (90 on full load). I just think if you care about playing the latest and greatest computer games, you shouldn't be paying more for a card that will perform around 20% less than the card that is cheaper, although it may be slightly older. Otherwise get a 560 or even a 570, as I think all the 400 series had problems with noise/heat output, but I may be wrong.

The 570 is closer to the 480gtx performance, and you can get one for $270: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814130593, which may be out of your price range.

Did you mean the current 500 and 600 series?

I agree the 480gtx is a power sucking beast and runs pretty hot, and the insanely loud fan can be annoying at times, but I don't have decent speakers to begin with for my desktop to help cover the noise. The heat issue can be solved by running nvinspector, so my card is usually sitting at 45 degrees when browsing around the internet or whatever (90 on full load). I just think if you care about playing the latest and greatest computer games, you shouldn't be paying more for a card that will perform around 20% less than the card that is cheaper, although it may be slightly older. Otherwise get a 560 or even a 570, as I think all the 400 series had problems with noise/heat output, but I may be wrong.

The 570 is closer to the 480gtx performance, and you can get one for $270: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814130593, which may be out of your price range.

I dont care if it sucks up alot of power..... I run tubes in my stereo receivers... haha,, THe hell with this green energy ****

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!