DNS/FQDN same as external website domain


Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Signed up over here to start participating in the awesome discussions... have an issue thats had me stumped for a few days now at one of my customer's office and I'm hoping someone can lead me in the right direction.

They have a Windows Server (2003) that is hosting DNS... and when people access their site domain.com internally it brings them to the server (named edge)'s local IIS site and not the external website.

They aren't even on a domain! And there is a www. record pointing to the externally hosted website's IP but even www. brings you to the local edge IIS site.

Thanks for your help!!

You don't need to be on a domain to use a local DNS server. The computer will use whatever DNS server it is configured to use, either manually or via DHCP.

If you have a problem with the DNS server resolving the correct IP address for a zone you should check the DNS server's configuration. Do you have a single A (or AAAA if you're using IPv6) record for the external IP in the forward lookup zone configured on the DNS server?

And why are they hosting DNS on this server if not using AD? Clearly they want people to resolve stuff using this server, so who admins the server? Have them fix the records for what they are resolving if its not right?

They're using the server for file sharing... I see an smtp record and some IP reservations... I just setup a Watchguard for VPN. My next option was to disable DNS on the server and put those entries in the firewall... but didn't want to accidentally take down their mail entry (maybe having to reconfigure all 40 clients with new mail settings) so I was wondering if there was a quick fix. I'm against even having 40 clients use server in a workgroup environment but they're not paying for licensing and half the computers are home premium clients :/

you need a redirect to direct them to the external ip if the external ip is not part of your network. an A record redirecting www should work just fine. This is why we do not configure internal domains with external domain names. It creates issues like this.

Hey all,

Signed up over here to start participating in the awesome discussions... have an issue thats had me stumped for a few days now at one of my customer's office and I'm hoping someone can lead me in the right direction.

They have a Windows Server (2003) that is hosting DNS... and when people access their site domain.com internally it brings them to the server (named edge)'s local IIS site and not the external website.

They aren't even on a domain! And there is a www. record pointing to the externally hosted website's IP but even www. brings you to the local edge IIS site.

Thanks for your help!!

Remove all references to the external domain from the DNS server AND TCP/IP settings on the workstations and servers (especially primary DNS suffix settings in the TCP/IP and System settings where the computer names are set).

Remove all references to the external domain from the DNS server AND TCP/IP settings on the workstations and servers (especially suffix settings in the TCP/IP tab).

and what happens when the internal domain is named the same as the external then you delete everything...you just fubar'd your network.

and what happens when the internal domain is named the same as the external then you delete everything...you just fubar'd your network.

There is no internal domain, as referenced by the OP. I'm assuming external DNS is coming from the ISP, removing the entries will make the internal network go to the ISP for the info.

There was no parent A record... I created one with the external IP, that didn't work either. I'll admit, I am a DNS n00b but I'm assuming it should be hitting the external site with parent A record and www A record... let me remote in and screenshot the DNS so you guys can check me if you wouldn't mind.

There was no parent A record... I created one with the external IP, that didn't work either. I'll admit, I am a DNS n00b but I'm assuming it should be hitting the external site with parent A record and www A record... let me remote in and screenshot the DNS so you guys can check me if you wouldn't mind.

Send a dump of ipconfig /all from the server and a workstation too.

then delete the domain in the dns server. if you aren't on a domain, why are you using dns unless you need to redirect locally....even still you can use host file to redirect.

what is the order of operations...

host file first - do you have an entry in your host file (c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts - open in notepad)

is here a screwed up entry in lmhosts?

dns would be next.

do a nslookup for the website in a dos prompt this will query the dns server and find out what it thinks, nslookup will not use host files it is a query against the dns server.

open a command prompt

nslookup www.google.com

put in your domain vs google and see what it comes up with

what is the order of operations...

host file first - do you have an entry in your host file (c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts - open in notepad)

is here a screwed up entry in lmhosts?

dns would be next.

I think it's lmhosts, hosts, WINS, then DNS for 2003. But the problem would be on the workstations, so it might be something else.

Wow... that did it... posting the screenshot made me take a second look and it was pretty obvious after nslookup there were two A records... you guys are the ****. After seeing DNS config should I leave everything how it is or disable DNS because we're not really using it (from what I see)?

Wow... that did it... posting the screenshot made me take a second look and it was pretty obvious after nslookup there were two A records... you guys are the ****. After seeing DNS config should I leave everything how it is or disable DNS because we're not really using it (from what I see)?

If all you're doing is duplicating the ISP's records, then you shouldn't have entries in DNS. It's really not recommended.

Well crap... I just ping'ed each entry and the IPs match the external IPs (from my ISP, not from their server) so you're right... I don't need DNS. Can I delete the whole reverse/forward DNS zone?

Also, second question... if anyone is familiar with Watchguard/VPN... the branch office I setup is on a different subnet. When I ping edge (server name) or any clients... it doesn't resolve. I fixed with host files.. but is there a way to have WINS resolve over the VPN? So we can ping without manual hosts file mapping?

you can fully uninstall dns.

You will need a common wins server that handles all wins resolution, but yes you can. point all to 1 wins server. it would be much better if you enabled active directory, that would solve your issues and have a common user base, which it is easier to share with and setup common mappings.

Well crap... I just ping'ed each entry and the IPs match the external IPs (from my ISP, not from their server) so you're right... I don't need DNS. Can I delete the whole reverse/forward DNS zone?

Also, second question... if anyone is familiar with Watchguard/VPN... the branch office I setup is on a different subnet. When I ping edge (server name) or any clients... it doesn't resolve. I fixed with host files.. but is there a way to have WINS resolve over the VPN? So we can ping without manual hosts file mapping?

What I think you want is something like "office.domain.com" then your internal office servers and workstations are computername.office.domain.com. That way you can keep your DNS resolution for the VPN and also have WINS lookup thru DNS. If you add office.domain.com to the dns suffix search on the workstations and enable dynamic DNS updates, then honestly you won't even need WINS.

Recommended practice for internal networks is not to use a internet extension like .com or .org, etc. .local, .lan, .internal, etc is recommended and preferred. This way if you do register externally your dns server won't get confused or need to put in manual entries.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That's not clickbait. Clickbait is headlines like, "You'll never guess what this person looks like now" for example. For goodness sake, take a look around the internet if you think this is clickbait. How do sites survive if people don't click through to articles? How many people in all honesty would have clicked this if it had your suggested headline? You and those upvoting your post won't be happy until the web is a couple of hundred websites all behind a paywall.
    • HopToDesk 1.46.2.0 by Razvan Serea HopToDesk aims to improve the user experience by providing a free, easy-to-use, and secure remote desktop solution for all major device types including Windows PC, Mac, Linux, Android, Chrome Books, iOS, and even Raspberry Pi devices. HopToDesk empowers you to connect, control, and collaborate with ease. Whether you're providing IT support, managing remote teams, or accessing your own devices from anywhere, HopToDesk offers a reliable and secure solution. HopToDesk does not and cannot monitor user activity as the application uses end-to-end encryption for all traffic, and does not make a distinction between personal and business use (both are allowed). Additionally, HopToDesk includes many of the main features of common remote desktop solutions such as Unattended Access, File Transfer, Live Chat, Wake-On-LAN, 2FA, Direct IP access, a Recent Session and Favorite list, and is available in over 20 languages. HopToDesk can run in portable mode or installed on desktop operating systems. Installation is optional, and will install the HopToDesk service which runs in the background and listens for incoming connections, allowing the device to be accessible at all times. Why Choose HopToDesk? Completely Free: Enjoy full access for both personal and commercial use—no hidden fees or limitations. End-to-End Encryption: All communications, including screen sharing, file transfers, and chats, are protected with robust encryption. Open Source: Contribute to and benefit from a transparent and community-driven project. No Account Required: Connect instantly without the need for sign-ups or subscriptions. Core Features Remote Control & Screen Sharing: Effortlessly access and manage remote devices. File Transfer: Securely send and receive files with drag-and-drop simplicity. Live Chat: Communicate in real-time during sessions. Multi-Monitor Support: Navigate multiple screens with ease. Clipboard Synchronization: Copy and paste seamlessly across devices. Wake-on-LAN: Power on remote systems remotely. Session Recording: Document sessions for future reference. Two-Factor Authentication: Enhance security with an additional verification layer. Custom Branding: Personalize your remote sessions with custom avatars. Unattended Access: Connect to devices without requiring user intervention. Network Customization: Adjust settings like TURN relays and signaling servers to suit your environment. Centralized Device Management Utilize the HopToDesk Dashboard to: Monitor device status in real-time. Generate invite links for easy device integration. Customize network settings and synchronize changes effortlessly. Add a personal touch with custom avatars displayed during remote sessions. Download: HopToDesk 64-bit | HopToDesk 32-bit | ~9.0 MB (Freeware) Download: HopToDesk ARM64 | 21.4 MB Link: HopToDesk Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Or use Epic games and get full games for free. lol Steam and their demos. Thankfully there’s competition
    • Maybe I missed it, but does this say anywhere that the game save bug has been squashed? I haven't encountered it myself, but it would be nice to know I'm good to go. Anyway, amazingly well done game. Mostly more of the same. ...but when the same is best in class with improved graphics and features, then a win.
    • Well when your game flops, you should expect this. If I do bad at work, I would expect a layoff. Less than 1600 people played it on steam. https://steamdb.info/app/1934570/charts/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      118
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!