David Hasselhoff: "I Was The Ultimate Nick Fury"

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

58926594892300381587.jpg

?I didn?t see The Avengers yet,? Hasselhoff admitted to Movieline while discussing his appearance ? as David Hasselhoff ? in the R-rated sequel Piranha 3DD. ?I love Sam Jackson, but you know? my Nick Fury was the organic Nick Fury that was written and discussed with Stan Lee before anyone got in there to change it. Nick Fury was written to be tongue-in-cheek, and he had a cigar in his mouth, he was a tough guy ? he was cool.?

?Stan Lee said, ?You?re the ultimate Nick Fury,?? he remembered. ?Avi Arad, when they bought it, said, ?Don?t worry, you?re going to be the Nick Fury forever,? and they lied. [Pause] But that happens to me all the time. That?s when you realize life isn?t fair.?

http://movieline.com...samuel-jackson/

Grand Master

giantpotato

Posted
Posted

Well when it comes to looks he was closer looking to the comic book character, Forgetting the whole black/white thing even.

Ultimate Nick Fury's look is based on Samuel L. Jackson, so how could Hasslehoff's Nick fury look closer to his comic book version than Jackson compared to his comic book version :huh:

Veteran

rathefeare

Posted
Posted

Hee,hee I laugh because he supports a race with illegal speeds and dangerous driving practices yet people like him for it :D

The Gumball is an unique road rally type "race". Illegal speeds and driving practices are not necessary to "win". The "winner"( if there is such a thing ) is not the one with the fastest time, but the one attempting it in the most ludicrous vehicle or overcoming the most challenges.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account

      By Leopeva64 · Posted

      In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By cleverclogs · Posted

      Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!