Recommended Posts

Hello,

For decades I have been a stubborn, Cough! Bar steward when it came to computers I have always stuck with a HDD. Last year I bought two very slim Seagate SATA3 500GB HDD on Thursday I decided to splash on a set of SSD drives and use the HDD?s for storage and other things. I have always used RAID0, so I decided to do some research with regards to RAID0 on SSD.

What I found was conflicting reviews about using RAID0 on SSD drives. Some people say it?s very fast, and then you got the experts saying?? ?You must not use RAID0 on SSD because it disables TRIM?? But I found that RAID0 on SSD drives did make a difference. The OS installed within 15 minutes, to the desktop was 11 seconds and shut down was pushing the button and it?s off within a couple of seconds.

Because of the conflicting views about RAID0 and AHCI I?m stuck with do I use RAID0 or stick with what everybody else is telling just about everybody on various forums on the Internet to stay clear of using RAID0 because you won?t have TRIM.

With my M/B I can split the SATA connectors in two so I ran one on RAID and another on AHCI and the different between the two was quite a significant difference. Windows 7 rated the SSD as 7.9 and the AHCI was 7.1 which left a burning question that RAID0 does improve performance and speed but OCZ are advising not to use RAID0 and to stay well clear of using this on SSD drives?? I am a little flummoxed and I need a little guidence.

I tested the SSD with some software and there was a 30% increase in Read and Write to the SSD with RAID0 compared with AHCI...?

The next version of the Intel RST drivers support TRIM in RAID configurations, IIRC - so if you were using a motherboard that is compatible with these drivers you could happily use RAID.

The benefits of TRIM aren't exhibited immediately - after a fresh install, the drive should perform well, TRIM or not. It's later on that you'll notice the difference.

Now, most drives also offer some decent Garbage Collection capability which is meant to negate the effects of not having TRIM - I am not sure how well this works though.

TRIM is a feature that affects long term performance and reduces long term wear on the drives (as they have a finite lifespan of read/writes) so it will be blazing fast now, most experts say that an SSD is "fast enough" anyway, hopefully in the future you will be able to enable TRIM with RAID

If your SSD(s) are themselves in a RAID array, TRIM will be disabled (for now until the new drivers come along).

If your SSD(s) are *not* part of any RAID array, it doesn't matter if you use the RAID or ACHI setting in your BIOS; you can use TRIM either way. The RAID setting in of itself works the same as ACHI other than it also turns on RAID capability.

I used to have a RAID0 array before I got my second 2TB drive and my SSD. Now, I don't use a RAID array at all, but I left the drive setting in my BIOS set to RAID in case I ever need it again. I've had no problems with this and TRIM works just fine. But for what it sounds like you're doing, you'll need to wait for the new drivers so you can use your SSDs in a RAID config and still have TRIM. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!