Windows 8 Thoughts and Discussion


Recommended Posts

So, I've been reading about Windows 8 a bit lately and I gotta say, I'm not confident about this version of Windows.

I remember installing the very *first* developer preview version of Win 8 and I was hyped, but after a few days, the hype subsided. I went back to Win 7 and I felt right at home. The Win 8 aftertaste was bizarre and I came away from it confused about why they think that's what I want in an OS.

Now, fast forward to today and I hear that Aero Glass support is completely dropped. I am a huge fan of the Aero glass interface and if I'm to use Win 8, I'm going to have to download a fan made theme that returns the desktop to its former glory. As a desktop user, I feel like the effort to minimalize the OS was brought on by Microsoft's desire to put this desktop on a battery chugging tablet. I feel like I'm getting the ****ty end of the stick. This is not what I wanted. I don't care that it matches your new Metro theme, I think it doesn't match. I think it's fugly. Desktop and tablet do not mix in my opinion.

And this is where I feel like Windows 8 might be a disaster. As a tablet OS, I think it might be a disaster and as a desktop OS, I think it will be a disaster. I think Win 7 is the new XP. People will cling to it until its death... Win 8 will be the new Vista... definitely not in terms of bloat, but in terms of it being totally unwanted.

I do not look at Win 8 as an OS that was built out of desire or request, I look at it as an attempt to enter into the tablet market by piggy backing off their desktop user base. This is pretty undesirable behavior, Microsoft. I appreciate their efforts to make a tablet / desktop hybrid OS, but I feel like the desktop and tablet should have been separate operating systems. Sure, they are fully well entitled to use their OS how they want to, but I'm also fully well entitled to avoid this one like the plague.

Their latest blunder was going with ARM for tablets instead of an x86 CPU... this seems limiting. Intel is obviously not happy with this decision. I'm not happy because it means that there will be incompatibilities between the tablet version and the desktop version. Wasn't Windows 8 supposed to bridge the gap between tablets and desktops? Intel already debuted its x86 mobile CPU and from what I understand, it's good. The device sucked, but the mobile x86 CPU was good. Going with ARM seems like the wrong decision, in my opinion.

Not to mention, the tablet version of Windows 8 will be shutting out browser competition. I only recently got an android phone and being able to install Firefox on there alleviated some stress of having to use that terrible android browser. I am NOT a fan. Not being able to use Firefox on a Windows 8 tablet may make or break me when it comes to deciding on which tablet to buy. Minority or not, I believe this will have some far reaching repercussions. People will tell others not to get a Windows 8 tablet and this will reverberate. This happened with Vista, I don't see why it wouldn't with Windows 8.

Unlike Apple fanboys, Windows fanboys are bold enough to reject certain Microsoft creations. It makes me wonder why Microsoft would even chance something like this.

I'm gearing up to try the Win 8 release candidate when its released so I will hold my final judgement until then... but I would be lying if I said I didn't already have a predisposition based on everything I've been reading lately. It seems like bad news followed by more unexpected bad news.

Thoughts?

-Captain

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1080115-windows-8-thoughts-and-discussion/
Share on other sites

"Not to mention, the tablet version of Windows 8 will be shutting out browser competition."

Huh? Both Chrome and Firefox are coming to Win8 ARM. How is that hurting competition? You won't be using the desktop on ARM anyway, save for Office.

It's because people like you that Vista has a bad reputation. Just blindly believing everything people say.

You used the DP for a little bit, went back to Win7 and never tried it again, yet you believe everything they say on the forums.

Use it for a while and you might actually like it, like so many of us.

You will never like it if you keep seeing it as a Tablet OS, with the desktop as an afterthought, which it isn't

  • Like 2

"Not to mention, the tablet version of Windows 8 will be shutting out browser competition."

Huh? Both Chrome and Firefox are coming to Win8 ARM. How is that hurting competition? You won't be using the desktop on ARM anyway, save for Office.

To ARM? Do you have a source for that?

That's true, but perhaps only for Windows 8. For Windows RT, there are a few sticky points at the moment - namely the inability to mark data as executable. It's great for security, but makes it harder to make an efficient JavaScript interpreter.

Both companies are working on Metro versions, but only for x86. They can't port to ARM because Metro browsers rely on running Win32 code which Windows RT won't allow. https://www.neowin.net/news/mozilla-firefox-would-be-crippled-on-windows-rt

Both companies are working on Metro versions, but only for x86. They can't port to ARM because Metro browsers rely on running Win32 code which Windows RT won't allow. http://www.neowin.ne...d-on-windows-rt

False. Metro apps work on both WinRT and x86. I'm sure Mozilla can come up with something else. That's nothing more than Google crying foul because they can't sink their dirty hands deeper into system processes.

Desktop apps are the ones that need to be recompiled for ARM. But the desktop is only on ARM because of Explorer and Office.

What can I say about it? well in short, I dislike it. I dislike being forced into using Metro, and I dislike the fact that they're apparently going to remove aero. If people find ways to hack those features out and in respectively I may consider using it, but otherwise Windows 8 is a release that I intend to skip, for the first time... ever.

"Not to mention, the tablet version of Windows 8 will be shutting out browser competition."

Huh? Both Chrome and Firefox are coming to Win8 ARM. How is that hurting competition? You won't be using the desktop on ARM anyway, save for Office.

The last I heard, Microsoft was effectively banning JIT compilers via API restrictions and reserving those same API's for IE and Microsoft only. That pretty much eliminates all the popular browsers. I very much doubt these companies are going to completely rewrite and maintain their browsers just for WinRT.

No only does this raise anti-trust concerns, but it degrades the user experience as well.

The last I heard, Microsoft was effectively banning JIT compilers via API restrictions and reserving those same API's for IE and Microsoft only. That pretty much eliminates all the popular browsers. I very much doubt these companies are going to completely rewrite and maintain their browsers just for WinRT.

No only does this raise anti-trust concerns, but it degrades the user experience as well.

There are no anti-trust concerns when WinRT has 0% market share.

There are no anti-trust concerns when WinRT has 0% market share.

It's about Windows and IE, not WinRT. Unless Microsoft is going to call their tablet OS branding WinRT? If it carries the Windows name and contains IE, it's a potential anti-trust concern to regulators.

It's about Windows and IE, not WinRT. Unless Microsoft is going to call their tablet OS branding WinRT? If it carries the Windows name and contains IE, it's a potential anti-trust concern to regulators.

They are calling it WinRT.

Of particular concern are the APIs that IE has access to which Microsoft is denying other browsers, including VirtualAlloc / HeapAlloc and friends, CreateNamedPipe, ConnectNamedPipe, DisconnectNamedPipe, CreateProcess, and various others.

These APIs allow for things like making memory executable, a prerequisite for building a JIT [just-in-time compiler]. Without a JIT, it will be impossible to build a modern browser. These APIs also allow for things like spawning additional processes, and communicating between them -- something we use to isolate plug-ins for security and stability purposes and other browsers, including IE, use to isolate tabs and windows for security and stability purposes.

First, Microsoft is limiting plug-ins to pretty much Flash for Metro. Nothing else will be allowed. Why Mozilla is crying fowl over this, I do not know, but Firefox isn't known to be the most speedy of browsers. I don't need ten billion Mozilla Firefox plug-ins junking up my tablet. Second, it wouldn't be too difficult to come up with a new system of tab isolation, something that is system independent.

Windows on Arm is a different OS from x64 Windows. You can't just simply port code over and expect it to work, changes need to be made. The only reason legacy code was moved over was for Office to use, and Explorer. Quite frankly it shouldn't even be there to begin with. WinRT should be strictly Metro, but that's not up to us.

They are calling it WinRT.

Right. So when these things go on sale, there'll be no mention of Windows then? Regardless, we'll have to wait and see. I have a feeling Microsoft will allow others browsers in the end, whether they want to or not.

Right. So when these things go on sale, they'll be no mention of Windows then? Regardless, we'll have to wait and see. I have a feeling Microsoft will allow others browsers in the end, whether they want to or not.

That's up to them.

False. Metro apps work on both WinRT and x86. I'm sure Mozilla can come up with something else. That's nothing more than Google crying foul because they can't sink their dirty hands deeper into system processes.

Desktop apps are the ones that need to be recompiled for ARM. But the desktop is only on ARM because of Explorer and Office.

If it uses only WinRT (the API, not short for Windows RT) code, then yes it can be compiled for (languages such as C++) or run on (languages such as C#) both x86 and ARM. However, Metro IE indeed relies on running the Win32-based rendering engine in the background. If you don't believe me, open Metro IE, check Task Manager, and notice you're now running iexplore.exe, a Win32 process.

If it uses only WinRT (the API, not short for Windows RT) code, then yes it can be compiled for (languages such as C++) or run on (languages such as C#) both x86 and ARM. However, Metro IE indeed relies on running the Win32-based rendering engine in the background. If you don't believe me, open Metro IE, check Task Manager, and notice you're now running iexplore.exe, a Win32 process.

I don't expect that to last long. Something the IE will change at a later date. WinRT should be Metro only, and that it appears to be doing just that.

Now, fast forward to today and I hear that Aero Glass support is completely dropped.

Can you post a link to an official statement from MS that says explicitly that Glass will not be available at all in Windows 8? All I've read is that Glass won't be the default theme which is quite different from what you're saying. Until the RC is released I don't think we know whether Glass will be available but I suspect it will be there for users to select, just not switched on by default.

I also think you're confused about Windows on ARM and MS's tablet strategy. There will be plenty of x86-based tablets available and all tablets will be able to run the same Metro apps regardless of whether they are ARM or x86-based.

Unlike Apple fanboys, Windows fanboys are bold enough to reject certain Microsoft creations.

LMAO that is so true and funny. No offense to Apple fans though, but that is just a very true observation IMHO. Maybe because of the vast number of users.

Can you post a link to an official statement from MS that says explicitly that Glass will not be available at all in Windows 8? All I've read is that Glass won't be the default theme which is quite different from what you're saying. Until the RC is released I don't think we know whether Glass will be available but I suspect it will be there for users to select, just not switched on by default.

I also think you're confused about Windows on ARM and MS's tablet strategy. There will be plenty of x86-based tablets available and all tablets will be able to run the same Metro apps regardless of whether they are ARM or x86-based.

Yeah, I think all we really know is in the latest build the default theme has been updated with a flat, non transparent metro style. All the stuff under the hood that makes aero possible is still there... (DWM). It could be possible that a "classic" aero theme is included, but not default.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!