Samsung Galaxy S3 (GTi9300)


Recommended Posts

This phone is so much better in daily usage over the S2. Because it's so fast and so smooth at everything, my usage habits just feel like they're cruising past at light speed. That and the extra screen estate makes for such a good user experience.

The Rock case is also simply brilliant. The way it feels in the hand is unlike any other case from any other brand. It really does feel like a natural extension to the phone as opposed to a phone with a case on it.

Anyone who doesn't have it should find someone who does and have a good old feel! I also like the fact that it doesn't attract any finger marks or smudges of any kind unlike virtually all other hard/TPU/gel cases.

So today has been the first day at work with my phone and a first indication of what to expect in terms of battery consumption when solely relying on 3G/HSDPA for the entire working day. I don't connect to WiFi at present there because our connection is being upgraded in a few months and as it stands it's too slow and shared so often poor.

I can confirm the S3 gets a stronger signal than the S2 does on 3 for me at work, it's 2 bars extra. Download speed is 4-5Mbit compared to the 2-3 the S2 was pulling from my desk.

On the S2, by the time I got home the battery would be down to 20-30% with around 2 hours screen on time, more % with lower screen on time though.

With the S3 though it's much much better, just got it down to 1% now and took screenshots:

s3-battery_2012.06.11.jpg

I've also taken note of how long it takes to charge, seems not very long at all...

01% @ 23:12

11% @ 23:32

22% @ 23:49

31% @ 00:03

41% @ 00:17

51% @ 00:32

Total time to 50% charged: 1hr 26mins

That was observed charging using the official mains charger via the Zenis dock. rather fast charging for a 2100mAh battery.

  • Like 1

Have to say I far prefer the look of the pebble blue than the white one. I'd end up getting the white one covered in god knows what.

As much as I'd love to have this phone I'm currently stuck with my Galaxy S because my contract doesn't end until next year, not that I can afford the contract prices they're asking for anyway. Looks like a beautiful piece of kit though.

The phone looks great but what really turns me off is the fact that it's S-AMOLED... All of the phones I see with this type of screen just look blue with colors that are way too bright (plastic-looking) to me. Do you find this the same or improved on the S3??

like I've said its a pretty nice phone, Samsung has done a pretty good job. A nice review.

BUT

as we know and for people that know about single core, dual core and now quad core, Android does a very bad job when even trying to use dual core and it barely utilizing the 2nd core, unless there is an OS that can utilize more than a single core properly then I don't see the point to these dual and quad core android phones, I wish people would see that its just a marketing stunt so far. The Android OS has to be scrapped and rewritten to make it perform well on these phones soon. When Windows 8 OS is released that does fully utilize more than one core you will see that Android has been just an excuse of an OS that has led you to believe you have all this power and distract you with customization. It will be interesting later this year to see this phone with the same internal specs running WP8 and compare it to the Android version.

The phone looks great but what really turns me off is the fact that it's S-AMOLED... All of the phones I see with this type of screen just look blue with colors that are way too bright (plastic-looking) to me. Do you find this the same or improved on the S3??

Having owned the S2 for a year and having had 2 in the household and other family memebers also owning the S2, the S3 screen has been tweaked so is less vibrant than the S2 (and Lumia handsets, and teh HTC One S). It's much more pleasing and colours do appear more natural and close to what you see.

It's still more vibrant than an IPS-LCD (expected) but the pinch of vibrancy on the S-AMOLED HD screen is a welcome one.

Here's a photo I shot with the S3 camera then placed on the scene itself to photograph again with my dslr:

IMG_9788-Edit.jpg

The camera really is impressive,. I used teh HDR mode for that shot to ensure that shadows and highlights were'nt off.

  • Like 2

This official Samsung car mount works on multiple phones, not just the S3 unlike the S2 car mount I had which only worked on the S2 and only when not using a case which was a double whammy of a negative for that mount.

Have Samsung learnt the error of their ways and improved this new mount? Let's find out...

This kit comes in 3 parts, the S2 mount comes in 2:

samsung-veh-mount_1.jpg

The ball joint clips into this socket while the screw tightens the fit:

samsung-veh-mount_2.jpg

Unfortunately Samsung didn't leave room for arm adjustment so the number of ways to point the mount is very limited again, just like the S2 mount, you need to have it quite high up on the windscreen to get decent movement of the head:

samsung-veh-mount_3.jpg

samsung-veh-mount_4.jpg

Ultimately it still suffers one of the main flaws I found on the S2 dock, lack of adjustment and being aimed at windscreen mounting only as opposed to dashboard discs (see pic below). It's less advanced than the S2 mount because it doesn't have a socket the phone sits into to activate car mode, but if it did it wouldn't work on other phones whereas this one will work on almost any phone that's of compatible width as both side arms retract in and out.

So it's just a car mount that's tough and sturdy in motion, it doesn't vibrate and the suction is very strong but for what it costs I'd much rather recommend the Nokia CR-115 with a bit of DIY to the stock arm padding (remove them and replace with thinner pads) to work on phones as wide as an S3 because you get better movement and a slimmer profile for easier storage. It also costs less than ?10 depending on where you shop. I also think it's by far the nicest looking mounts out there and because it's a genuine brand made one, it's good quality too.

Nokia CR-115:

samsung-veh-mount_comp-nokiacr115.jpg

--

Update:

The modding has started early :p I was looking at the ball joint and then at the ball joint on the Exomount car holder and realised they looked the same size....

samsung-veh-mount_mod_1.jpg

samsung-veh-mount_mod_2.jpg

The Exomount isn't exactly cheap either though so not an ideal solution, there may be mounts out there that use ball joints that are cheap though!

One thing that has ****ed me off with the S3 is that you cannot move apps to SD anymore, which has been available since 2.x of Android. It works perfectly on my Xoom on ICS so its not an ICS issue, it's purely the S3 as has been confirmed on many android community threads, wish I had looked for this beforehand as the 16GB is not enough and I was used to moving games etc to SD which can no longer be done :(

One thing that has ****ed me off with the S3 is that you cannot move apps to SD anymore, which has been available since 2.x of Android. It works perfectly on my Xoom on ICS so its not an ICS issue, it's purely the S3 as has been confirmed on many android community threads, wish I had looked for this beforehand as the 16GB is not enough and I was used to moving games etc to SD which can no longer be done :(

Hmm? 16GB is more than enough for games/navigational map data etc. Everything els eis stored on the SD card, you're not forgetting that the S3 supports 64GB SD cards right? Probably even larger cards when they come out too.

Hmm? 16GB is more than enough for games/navigational map data etc. Everything els eis stored on the SD card, you're not forgetting that the S3 supports 64GB SD cards right? Probably even larger cards when they come out too.

Not for hardcore gamers, when some of the latest games are 3GB in size!

Samsung is blaming Google and vice versa for not being able to move apps to the SD card, so I'm not hopeful for a fix any time soon... although it doesn't bother me in the slightest, not even using half of my 16GB storage.

I don't know why you'd leave games installed that are long done with though. I can't see how you can consume all that storage on the same phone! Before you reach the limit you'd be on a new handset by then surely. That and in future updates devs will be able to store game data on the sd card anyway as some already do right now.

I don't know why you'd leave games installed that are long done with though. I can't see how you can consume all that storage on the same phone! Before you reach the limit you'd be on a new handset by then surely. That and in future updates devs will be able to store game data on the sd card anyway as some already do right now.

I've seen lots of people talking about switching to another phone because of this very issue so it's obviously a problem for some.

One of the major selling points for the S3 is that it continues to support MicroSD cards when other top Android phones don't. It would be better if it had apps2sd support.

The problem is, if you purchase a move for example, or some music via the store, it is stored on the internal SD, with the app2sd you were able to move it to the external SD (even though its not an app) but now you can't. This also eats a lot of space :( It's now like an iDrone, in that you have to delete stuff in order to make room for new stuff :(

The app2sd feature is part of android OS and Samsung have disabled it, even the devs for the app2sd app on marketplace have said its samsungs fault as they disabled it within their build of the OS, so there seems to be nothing we can do :( Sadly it is a sort of deal breaker for me, as I also use a lot of books, and now the way the external is configured I have to put them on the internal SD which takes up another 7GB as the reader apps cannot see them on the external, due to the fact they require write access for some reason :(

If the limitations on Apps2SD is really such a deal breaker then why not just root and work around it using Titanium Backup which allows the move of apps and data to external SD card?

Sorry but I still don't buy it as a major deal breaking problem because here in this thread is the only place I've read about it being a problem. Everywhere else people have worked around it if they've ever encountered it.

It may be an issue for some but the benefits of the S3 put it above any other phone, chief of which is exFAT support so you're no longer bound by the max 4GB limit for files, which means no more need to split large movies into <4GB chunks for watching when connected to a HDTV or whatever.

Titanium Backup only backs up the apk files etc, they are still installed to the internal memory, you cannot force the install/move of that resource to external SD by using Titanium backup. The clue is in the name, backup ...

There is no way around it thus far, I have been on numerous forums regarding this and all are saying the same it's down to samsung and their build of the OS and you cannot circumvent it. The general concensusis that they (samsung) did it to force people to buy the higher memory capacity devices, which are in short supply, sadly making them worse than apple and the idrone :(

Dont get me wrong, I wholeheartedly prefer the SGS over an idrone, but this issue is HUGE and needs addressing.

Thanks for your review! I used to have a SGS1 and have been using an iPhone 4 since January '10.

I'm trying to decide whether to get the SGS3 or wait for the iPhone 5.

So hard to decide, the S3 looks sexy!

Thanks for your review! I used to have a SGS1 and have been using an iPhone 4 since January '10.

I'm trying to decide whether to get the SGS3 or wait for the iPhone 5.

So hard to decide, the S3 looks sexy!

I went from an SGS Vibrant to the SGS3, and I'm VERY happy with it so far, it's a huge improvement, even better than my Mom's 4s, by both our standards, I'll be 100% happy with it once I get a 32-64gb SD card in it, that and I'm still searching for a thin case for mine

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE: 2012.08.09

Last night the 4th LED on the powerbank stopped working, it's just the LED itself, it charges to max and so on, just the LED doesn't light up. I imagine there's probably a bad batch issue in manufacturing and have notified mobilefun about this and in turn they're notifying buyers/suppliers of the issue.

--

I received a new accessory today, well I actually received it some weeks ago but the first one was faulty, this one just came back in stock :)

powerbank_attached.jpg

It's the Power Bank sold by MobileFun, I don't know who manufactures it but it's high quality in build, if it had a Samsung logo on the back then it could otherwise be an official product. It does come in white too :)

How does it work?

Initially I thought it would daisy chain alongside the built in battery and give 4400mAh of power but having now fully tested it, it acts like a normal power source (seen as a USB source by the phone as it outputs at 500mA).

The idea is that you would have the bank charged up beforehand and switch the bank on when your phone's battery is low and it will begin charging. Technically you could leave it switched on at all times so as soon as the phone battery drops, it charges back up immediately again but the bottom row light lights on the bank remain active while it is on, I imagine this will drain some of the battery in the bank too so best off using it once the phone's battery gets low.

The bank can also be switched on and off at any time while attached to the phone. The LED on the bank flashes while charging the phone and the number of active LEDs decreases as the charge from the bank transfers to the phone:

powerbank.gif

Does it add bulk?

Yes! It's 15.5mm thick so adds some bulk to the S3. It's not unacceptably bulky though and you could use it as a full time case as well as it allows full use of all ports on the phone and has a convenient kickstand. It weighs 81 grams.

How useful is it really? It's quite expensive afterall...

It is quite pricey but for many people it's a small price to pay to be able to get power to the phone when a standard power source is not available and you're running low on battery juice.

Extra Pictures

powerbank_boxed.jpg

powerbank_thickness.jpg

powerbank_stand.jpg

powerbank_front.jpg

powerbank_rear.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!