Recommended Posts

About damn time games started using the hardware! Sick of games being held back by 8 year old consoles. I bet AMD and NVIDIA also love this. For years you could run games extremely well with really old cards.

GTX460s aren't exactly new anymore.

I think it's clear that this is going to be a poor pc port, seeing as they easily have it running on 360/ps3. 

I'm all for pushing steep requirements (I have a SLI 760's setup) , I've been waiting for these new consoles for years to help give graphics the boost PC has been patiently waiting on.

But I think company's should still provide settings for older computers to run their games, or they will make PC gaming look even more elitist than it is currently portrayed. 

 

I'm fairly confident watch dogs could run on well under 4gb of ram if it was optimized correctly. Most top of the line games don't usually push more than 2-3gb of use.

 

DX11 and 64bit OS is fair enough though. 

 

Looking forward to this one.

  • Like 2

I think it's clear that this is going to be a poor pc port, seeing as they easily have it running on 360/ps3. 

I'm all for pushing steep requirements (I have a SLI 760's setup) , I've been waiting for these new consoles for years to help give graphics the boost PC has been patiently waiting on.

But I think company's should still provide settings for older computers to run their games, or they will make PC gaming look even more elitist than it is currently portrayed. 

 

I'm fairly confident watch dogs could run on well under 4gb of ram if it was optimized correctly. Most top of the line games don't usually push more than 2-3gb of use.

 

DX11 and 64bit OS is fair enough though. 

 

Looking forward to this one.

 

 

 

then explian the 2011 demo of it that had no console  tied to the game  the game is first PC then next gen including Wii U  and then current Gen 7th gen consoles   so  it is not gonna be a Port  unless you consider  a PC port to PC a port  then sure  

it's time to kill 32bit and it's unreasonable 4GB limit.

 

Nothing unreasonable, it's just math, unless math are unreasonable?

The switch to 64bit for games would have happened sooner or later anyway, the 2Gb per process boundary and graphics memory adressing requirement have been pushing the boundaries for a while. Even blizzard had to compile a 64bit version of Wow to accomodate for some setups.

  • Like 1

The 4GB limit is probably one of the lesser of many reasons to move to 64 bit. 

Not so much.  Texture RAM on the GPU and audio is mapped to that 4GB, so you choke out your AI and other processes with it the more stuff you have.

 

It's the most important reason to move games to 64 bit.

It's about time some commercial software started taking advantage of all the power on users' desktops. Funny thing, all those x86-x64 systems with 8GB Ram that have been upgraded over the years to overpower poorly written 32-bit software would be powerhouses now...

I think it's clear that this is going to be a poor pc port, seeing as they easily have it running on 360/ps3. 

I disagree. Ubisoft games have a very good track record on PC and usually are well optimised. The fact that the specs are so high and they're making 64bit a requirement only shows how seriously they're taking it, as that will seriously limit their potential audience. While it's disappointing that it won't scale my hope is that the game will be all the better for those able to run it. To me it indicates that PC gamers are getting the full next-gen experience rather than a dumbed down X360 / PS3.

 

We'll see how well the game does but I still have high hopes for it. Ubisoft stated early on that the PC is the lead platform, which is a lot better than the contempt we get from Rockstar. I just hope it can live up to its lofty ambitions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      571
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!