Recommended Posts

What the hell? The generation went from strongest launch lineup ever to the usual hit and miss. So now its basically Killzone and Driveclub for PS4 day one. This is very disappointing from a gaming point of view.

 

One game doesn't kill the lineup, still the best lineup since consoles went 3D. I don't have time to play all these games anyway. 

Sure, I hate to see the game delayed, and would have bought it at launch if it was there.

 

But if it's not there, well there's to many other good games for me to play to care to much if it's not available. I don't have time to play all the good games anyway. 

Meh, no big deal. I wasn't going to get it for the PS3 anyway, instead waiting for the PS4 version, so this doesn't affect me in any way. And I would rather that they take the time to polish it off rather than do what almost every other team seems to do, release a half-baked idea with a day-one patch to clear up the bugs that make the game unplayable.

then explian the 2011 demo of it that had no console  tied to the game  the game is first PC then next gen including Wii U  and then current Gen 7th gen consoles   so  it is not gonna be a Port  unless you consider  a PC port to PC a port  then sure  

 

I just meant to say, if they have the game running on 360/ps3 in some way, they could surely provide settings for it to run fine on 4gb of ram.

In fact, I will damn near guarantee that this game will be pretty playable on 4gb of ram anyway, with some occasional stutter in certain instances. 

 

If it's a crap port than a high end CPU may be necessary even on low settings. Hopefully not. 

mATX Intel G41-chipset motherboards fall into this category if they only take DDR2 (example - ASUS P5G41-M LX2/GB - I have this mobo currently).  The CPU is Intel's Q6600 (not just x64, but quad-core to boot); however, the RAM is DDR2-800 (2GB x2).  If it took DDR3 (there *is* a DDR3 version of this board, with the same chipset) I would not be so *stuck*.  The issue is the type of RAM and the MCH, as 4GB DDR2 DIMMs, when they were available, have always been pricier than their faster DDR3 relatives - it makes more sense to change sockets altogether than to purchase another motherboard in what is basically a dead socket.

 

A setup like this really shouldn't be expected to play any new games, your pushing below "low end". 

What the hell? The generation went from strongest launch lineup ever to the usual hit and miss. So now its basically Killzone and Driveclub for PS4 day one. This is very disappointing from a gaming point of view.

Don't know about Killzone, but DriveClub was delayed not that long ago: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1182865-driveclub-officially-delayed-until-2014-sony-confirms/

this is mad ! and to think of all the digital retailers selling pre-orders already ! glad I didn't pre-order..

I pre-ordered the ps4 before I knew when it would launch.. just because something gets delayed doesn't mean don't pre-order it.  I pre-ordered destiny.. I have no clue when it will launch.

  • 1 month later...

A setup like this really shouldn't be expected to play any new games, your pushing below "low end". 

IN whose opinion, sir?  Never mind that the same setup runs BF4 or even NFS Rivals (their x64 executables, no less) with little issue from the CPU end.

 

I'm not saying that this isn't old hardware - I stipulated that the setup is, in fact, DEAD (as in no longer manufactured) hardware.

 

However (and this has been my point, with this thread and the similar thread regarding NFS Rivals) it has taken exactly how long for x64 to be leveraged properly by a mainstream game?

 

Look at how long it has been since x64 has been in the mainstream - note that even Q6600 didn't lead that.

 

And despite how long it has been since merely the first x64 P4 (let alone Athlon64 and Opteron) the first x64 operating systems had to be given away.  (Note that I'm referring to Windows XP Professional x64 Edition - it was NEVER sold even via the OEM channel.)

 

The x64 application push came during the Vista era - to a whimper.  (Microsoft Office 2010 x64 was the first x64 productivity suite - and it was basically a yawnfest.)

 

x32 gaming didn't push RAM utilization - mostly because it can't.  (Even within an x64 based flavor of Windows, an x32 application - or x32 game - is limited to 4 GB of RAM.  Most gamers don't run even other applications - let alone other games - while playing a game; that means if you have even 8 GB of RAM - let alone even more - what is the rest of your system doing while you're gaming?  Typically, it's loafing - by force.)

 

Back when this motherboard was designed and built, x64 was an outlier - when it comes to gaming, it's still largely is an outlier.  How well will Watch Dogs be received - remember, unlike BF4 or Rivals, there is no x32 option whatever.

 

(Here's a rather surprising fact - Watch Dogs is the first game OR application to have a FLOOR greater than 4 GB of RAM; to put that in perspective, the floor for Watch Dogs is twice the recommendation for either the current RTM or beta of Microsoft SQL Server - in both cases, it's 3 GB of RAM.)

 

In a real sense, Watch Dogs is,  even among x64 games, a major outlier (by having no x32 option).  It's not Waterfox (the x64-compiled Firefox) or even Word, let alone Rivals or BF4.

 

While quite a number of us (and that includes me) would really like to say "It's about time!", how well the game actually acts when it releases will be the proof of that.

 

And even INCLUDING Watch Dogs, do you realize that the number of x64 games for Windows out there will still be countable on one hand?

BF4 can be forced to run on very low settings, and NFS is a bad console port so the bad resource usage (Where it uses too little) is to be expected (GTA4 had a similar issue, throwing more CPU/RAM at it didn't help)

I just meant to say, if they have the game running on 360/ps3 in some way, they could surely provide settings for it to run fine on 4gb of ram.

In fact, I will damn near guarantee that this game will be pretty playable on 4gb of ram anyway, with some occasional stutter in certain instances. 

 

If it's a crap port than a high end CPU may be necessary even on low settings. Hopefully not.

It's limited to hell and back on the 360/PS3 though, textures are very low res, you'd have simplified (and less) AI, etc.

I think this is just a case where due to higher specs on the next gen consoles, devs can simply code sloppy to take up as much resources with little to no optimization and footprint monitoring and reduction.

 

It isn't so much that the game features require these new specs and services, it's that they can throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks.

I suppose this could be considered a transition period? 64-bit will eventually be the common standard in PC gaming, this is just the early days of it.

 

Anyway, if you are part of the PC master race you need to expect (and are constantly demanding) the latest and greatest.

I think this is just a case where due to higher specs on the next gen consoles, devs can simply code sloppy to take up as much resources with little to no optimization and footprint monitoring and reduction.

 

It isn't so much that the game features require these new specs and services, it's that they can throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks.

 

Do you really believe that? You really believe BF4 on Ultra Settings, at 1080p, 60+fps doesn't require that? No dropped frames, screen tearing, or hiccups. Rather, it's because of sloppy code it won't run like that x32 on a i5 with 2GB ram and iGPU?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!