Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a portable unit (window mounted) that has:

- minimum 4.3" screen, but would prefer a 5"

- bluetooth (must have)

- mp3 (must have)

And preferably with:

- voice to text

- look ahead navigation or whatever it is called (what lane to be in, and not only the current turn, but the next turn beyond that). Nothing is worse than getting a turn left, only to turn and have it say turn right in 50 ft and you have to jump two lanes in rush hour.

Thanks for all the recommendations!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1082457-recommend-me-a-gps/
Share on other sites

Tomtom. Take your pick.

I have a Magellan and a tomtom. The tomtom is 4 years old and the Magellan is 2 months old. The Tomtom is faster, more accurate, and doesn't freeze up. If I had a gun I would put a bullet through the Magellan. I haven't met a gps where the Bluetooth hands free was worth a crap, they need external mikes to work decent. Better off just getting a crappy Bluetooth head set, they work better. I have had garments and other tomtoms, I would go back to tomtom everytime from here on out.

I would suggest a TomTom. but the new TomTom's have some issues makign them suddenly stop receiving satelite signals if you don't update them.

however my primary reason for not suggesting them is I'd rather suggest Mio or another brand(though they're really good) that usesthe same software as them(iGo I think). I really miss my old Mio that was stolen, it was cheaper than my new TomTom and better, and most importantly, it had a full screen speedometer view, plus some other information in the corners around it, like what tway the next turn is, how long untill next turn, how long til destination and some other averages and stuff.

Havign a full screen speedo is far more useful than a full screen map, I just navigate by the voice anyway and can eaisly switch to the map view if needed.

Well, I've looked at basically everything out there on Amazon. 99% of them dropped the MP3 app. I have a Nuvi 350, which is awesome, but has an extremely small screen. The MP3 player pauses for any direction alerts as well as calls, then continues right on. No need to adjust volumes (i.e., turn down radio to hear GPS). I also get to hear what I want without a monthly fee, ads, or a DJ rambling on. It's pathetic they drop something so useful, yet keep the photo viewer.

My budget range is $300.00 for North America.

Not checked the new Mio's but I'd be surprised if they didn't have an MP3 app. however seems kind of useless if you don't have it connected to your car stereo in some way. listeing to music form the GPS would be... at best a backup solution. I'd rather get a decent pioneer set with USB/iPod dock/AUX inputs, and well, I did :p

Not checked the new Mio's but I'd be surprised if they didn't have an MP3 app. however seems kind of useless if you don't have it connected to your car stereo in some way. listeing to music form the GPS would be... at best a backup solution. I'd rather get a decent pioneer set with USB/iPod dock/AUX inputs, and well, I did :p

What I have in place currently is the Garmin Nuvi 350, bluetoothed to by BB (yeah, I know...but it's a work phone). The speaker jack from the GPS goes to the car's AUX IN. I play music, hear all directions and calls through the car stereo. I never need to touch the radio. However, the screen is way too small which causes far too much distraction as I often find myself leaning in to read the small screen or tapping the screen to find the next turn ahead of the one I'm about to make so I can get into the proper lane.

Honestly, just get a smart phone. They all have GPS now, and they are way more valuable than a stand alone GPS unit.

I have a Garmin Nuvi (don't remember the exact model) and it was really nice. But a few months after I bought it, I got my first smart phone, and I have literally never used it since. It just collects dust in a drawer.

Honestly, just get a smart phone. They all have GPS now, and they are way more valuable than a stand alone GPS unit.

I have a Garmin Nuvi (don't remember the exact model) and it was really nice. But a few months after I bought it, I got my first smart phone, and I have literally never used it since. It just collects dust in a drawer.

There are pros/cons to both solutions.. The nice thing about using a smartphone is that you have updated maps, traffic, etc. The bad thing is it eats through your battery, data plans are mostly limited now (although if you have Android, you can pre-cache on WiFi). I love using my Garmin, even though I have an Android phone. For me, it's much easier to use - the Garmin software is superb (even compared to all the other garbage GPS makers out there - TomTom, Magellan, etc.), the battery life is decent. The only downside is my GPS is old, and didn't have lifetime maps, so I have maps from 2010. For a pinch, the phone is great, but on long trips, it's always the Garmin.

Honestly, just get a smart phone. They all have GPS now, and they are way more valuable than a stand alone GPS unit.

I have a Garmin Nuvi (don't remember the exact model) and it was really nice. But a few months after I bought it, I got my first smart phone, and I have literally never used it since. It just collects dust in a drawer.

Actually sales of stand alkone GPS' has picked up since pepople learned more of GPS through their smart phones.

stand alone gives bigger and better screen, far better interfaces, better speakers, better and faster GPS'. In general there's a lot of pro's for not using your phone as a car GPS

  • 2 months later...

I'm looking for a portable unit (window mounted) that has:

- minimum 4.3" screen, but would prefer a 5"

- bluetooth (must have)

- mp3 (must have)

And preferably with:

- voice to text

- look ahead navigation or whatever it is called (what lane to be in, and not only the current turn, but the next turn beyond that). Nothing is worse than getting a turn left, only to turn and have it say turn right in 50 ft and you have to jump two lanes in rush hour.

Thanks for all the recommendations!

Not sure if I'm too late as I'm usually a lurker on the forum, but I figured I could throw in my .02 here as I did a fair amount of research before my purchase.

I went with the NUVI1690 Garmin GPS. It does voice navigation, lane assist (most important to me) and is bluetooth capable. Though, I don't recall finding a GPS that supported MP3 files, I'm not sure if there even is a gps that will play music. You could always get an adapter cord for your stereo?

I like this gps due to it's easy to read screen, simple instructions and simple set-up and go. Set the destination and sit back and enjoy the drive!

I wouldn't recommend a Mio GPS because I have one here but it's dead... not working anymore. I have had it for 1 yr.

Garmin is a better solution. I have not tried TomTom yet.

I have not used a GPS for awhile now because I haven't been on the long trips since 2010.

I tested a GPS on my phone and it was interesting but I wouldn't use it for long trips.

If its dead within one year it's still within warranty. So... Why aren't you returning it to be fixed. And any electronic device can go bad, just because you have one that is dead does not mean they're all bad.

I find a bigger issue with the fact that every TomTom we have sold the last 1-2 years has been returned because they suddenly stop receiving satellite signals untill we download an update. Which is absolutely ridiculous. There is no good reason a gps should suddenly not find satellites because you haven't updated the firmware in the last few months. Especially when it happens when you are on a vacation and are about to head back.

Do the new Garmins have a capacitive screen, or are they still resistive?

I have a Garmin from a few years ago and the one thing that I don't like is that you literally have to tap the screen for it to register.

If they have a capacitive screen and a faster, more responsive processor, I'd definitely buy a new one.

If its dead within one year it's still within warranty. So... Why aren't you returning it to be fixed. And any electronic device can go bad, just because you have one that is dead does not mean they're all bad.

I find a bigger issue with the fact that every TomTom we have sold the last 1-2 years has been returned because they suddenly stop receiving satellite signals untill we download an update. Which is absolutely ridiculous. There is no good reason a gps should suddenly not find satellites because you haven't updated the firmware in the last few months. Especially when it happens when you are on a vacation and are about to head back.

I wouldn't bother them to send me a replacement because I don't want a replacement device goes dead on me again... so I get something else instead of Mio.. My brother had Mio as well but it went dead on him too... He got a Garmin instead.

I wouldn't bother them to send me a replacement because I don't want a replacement device goes dead on me again... so I get something else instead of Mio.. My brother had Mio as well but it went dead on him too... He got a Garmin instead.

Why would your replacement go dead. You have a sample ration of "one" device and from hpthat you're inferring that 100% are bad. When every electronic device ever released has at least ~5% failure rate as standard.

By contrast, my Mio, before it got stolen lasted me years and was still better than the more expensive TomToms and grains I've tried. Better tunnel simulation, better maps(with upgrade iGo software instead of the pre iGo it came with) and unlike the more expensive "cheap" ones, it had tmc and Bluetooth.

Honestly, not having a token device replace on warranty for a repaired or replaced free one seems stupid to me. But then some people have more money than they need and just throw stuff away.

Google Maps app is really good though. I loved having it for my Virginia Beach trip and the real time traffic data was really nice. Made the trip so much smoother. I don't think it's hard to use at all. The routing engine was awesome and didn't derp up like my mom's Sanyo POS does all the time. The routing engine is the most important part, the GPS app can look pretty all it wants and if it can't route it's not worth a damn. Google Maps nav looks nice though. Also you get real time map data that's not dated. Also Google Maps actually responds to feedback and mapping corrections. Navteq and others that use thier data don't respond as quick.

Google Maps app is really good though. I loved having it for my Virginia Beach trip and the real time traffic data was really nice. Made the trip so much smoother. I don't think it's hard to use at all. The routing engine was awesome and didn't derp up like my mom's Sanyo POS does all the time. The routing engine is the most important part, the GPS app can look pretty all it wants and if it can't route it's not worth a damn. Google Maps nav looks nice though. Also you get real time map data that's not dated. Also Google Maps actually responds to feedback and mapping corrections. Navteq and others that use thier data don't respond as quick.

TomTom's live GPS' has better live updating than any google, most GPS' inf act updates theirmaps more often. As for routing, TomTom, Garmin and Mio all beat google hands down on that. except for the unfortunate thing with the GPS not receiving signals without an update after a While the tomTom Live GPS' also has full live traffic where supported, TMC , and community updated maps.

I use my HTC Trophy 7 with the turn by turn app.

It streams the directions to my headunit (and thus to my speakers) and I can play music off the phone at the same time so that I have music with break in directions.

Also, the maps are always up to date and I can save an offline cache if I want to. Lastly, it's always with me. It's an enormous win win.

  • 2 weeks later...

check if the insurance company provides them.

why on the sly though ? why not just tell them they're monitoring them ?

either way, I don't think GPS monitors and cheap can be in the same sentence. maybe those you can keep in your pocket when taking walks or taking photos. but those you have to recharge and dump with a cable regularly. and they won't record speeds and such.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!