Recommended Posts

I have this Windows 7 installed for about 3 months (estimated. not really exact.) and I'm having a really annoying and common problem: boot time. But my point is that I've already done all I know (that i could do) to reduce the boot time, but it's still really slow.

Some detailed information:

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

CPU: Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.1GHz

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P21 (B3)

RAM: Corsair ValueSelect 4GB DDR3 1333MHz

VGA: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition 1GB GDDR5

PSU: CoolerMaster eXtreme PowerPlus 550W

HDDs:

  • WD 500GB 7200RPM 16MB cache (First partiotion: Windows; second partition: Only files)
  • Seagate 320GB 7200RPM 8MB cache (Only files)
  • Fujitsu 60GB 5400RPM 8MB cache (Ubuntu installed)

Boot apps:

  • 56 on boot
  • 23 removed or delayed
  • 10 can be removed but are necessary
  • 46 can't be modified

I've already uninstalled what I don't need, cleared every system's garbage, uninstalled ghost drivers, removed or delayed apps from boot.

Could someone understand why this computer is taking from 1:40 to 2:30 (mm:ss) minutes to boot up?

I'd appreciate if someone tell me some other ideas for reducing boot time.

PS: I had a very lower computer configuration earlier, and it was booting VERY faster (from 30 to 60 seconds) than the actual one.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1082893-window-7-slow-boot/
Share on other sites

Is the CPU set for AHCI in BIOS?

Also, is IDE disabled? If not, you might as well disable it if everything you have is SATA. The IDE check usually takes 5-10 seconds if it's enabled.

Though I don't think these things would cause that long startup time.

You could unplugging all the other hard drives except the Windows one and see if it boots faster. Maybe the Ubuntu dual-boot isn't playing nice with the Windows startup.

The first thing i do when i buy a PC is to Format it. Crapware are the worst.

I recommend doing it if you have not done it.

run msconfig and disable unwanted service and startups(two different tabs).

Run some cleaner like ccleaner

Right "Disk cleanup" delete old system restore points and delete all temp files.

Check for faulty HDD and RAM

The first thing i do when i buy a PC is to Format it. Crapware are the worst.

I recommend doing it if you have not done it.

It's pretty clear that he built it from scratch. No PC manufacturer that I know of ships a PC with an MSI motherboard, Corsair RAM, and a Cooler Master PSU. ;)

Could be the hardware setup. I guess you have RAID on that motherboard. That will take 10-20s from the boot time. Is the BIOS set to quick boot? That will take another 10-15 seconds on the boot. Many things to consider and check.

Newer hardware have a tendency to have many features that will take longer time to boot up.

If you go in the event viewer, under applications and services logs, Microsoft, Windows, Diagnostics-Performance, it should have listed things that are taking longer than normal to boot, and the milliseconds it takes to load them. Also check your services.

I wasn't aware of this before so I'm going to keep that in mind. But is there a Server 2003 equivalent?
  • 2 weeks later...

Is the CPU set for AHCI in BIOS?

Also, is IDE disabled? If not, you might as well disable it if everything you have is SATA. The IDE check usually takes 5-10 seconds if it's enabled.

Though I don't think these things would cause that long startup time.

You could unplugging all the other hard drives except the Windows one and see if it boots faster. Maybe the Ubuntu dual-boot isn't playing nice with the Windows startup.

Dude, I think my problem was exactly the slowness of the IDE mode. :huh:

I activated the AHCI mode and everything became fast. :woot: I'm just testing it some more times to be sure it's fixed, but I'm almost sure this was the problem.

Also, thanks for all other replies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!