• 0

C# Calculating textbox values?


Question

Hi,

I have an application with 20 textboxes, i need to do the calculations for example ((TextBox12 * TextBox1 * TextBox7) / 2) and display the result on label when clicking a button.

Ive usually done these like this:


private void lBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
double L, L2;
if (double.TryParse(kTb1.Text, out L) && double.TryParse(kTb2.Text, out L2))
lBl4.Text = String.Format("{0:f1}", (L2 * L));
else
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
}
[/CODE]

I was wondering if there is better way to do this so that I don't have to add all 20 textboxes into this with && double.TryParse?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1083591-c-calculating-textbox-values/
Share on other sites

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You could add the text boxes into an array, and then iterate over the array...


private void lBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
TextBox[] textboxes = {
kTb1,
kTb2,
kTb3,
...
kTb20
};

double temp = 0D, total = 0D;
bool isError = false;
foreach (TextBox tb in textboxes)
{
if (!double.TryParse(tb.Text, out temp))
{
isError = true;
break;
}

total *= temp
}

if (isError)
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
else
lBl4.Text = String.Format("{0:f1}", total);
}
[/CODE]

To generate the array, you could create it in the form's constructor (or OnLoad event handler), and store it as a class variable...

[CODE]
TextBox[] m_textboxes;

protected void Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
TextBox[] m_textboxes = {
kTb1,
kTb2,
kTb3,
...
kTb20
};
}
[/CODE]

If the only text boxes on the form are the ones you'll be using in the calculation, you could also use the Controls property to get the list of child text boxes :)

  • 0

I'd put the textboxes into a panel, iterate the panels controls where the type is a textbox, load the value into an object then use the object to output your requirements.

Agreed that this is the best way to go.

  • 0

An application with 20 textboxes sounds like a pain in the ass to begin with. That said, you can at least factor out repetitive code inside methods, for instance you could create an extension method for textboxes to get their value as a double:


public static double getValue(this TextBox txtBox) {
return double.Parse(txtBox.Text;)
}
[/CODE]

So your code can look like:

[CODE]
try {
lbl4.Text = string.Format("{0:f0}", txt1.getValue() * txt2.getValue() / 3);
}
catch (Exception) {
MessageBox.Show("WTF?");
}
[/CODE]

Btw double.Parse with a try-catch (rather than TryParse) is probably the best approach here, it's not like the cost of throwing an exception in this case was of any significance and it leads to cleaner code.

  • 0

An application with 20 textboxes sound like a pain in the ass to begin with. That said, you can at least factor out repetitive code inside methods, for instance you could create an extension method for textboxes to get their value as a double:


<snip>
[/CODE]

Btw double.Parse with a try-catch (rather than TryParse) is probably the best approach here, it's not like the cost of throwing an exception in this case was of any significance and it leads to cleaner code.

How does what you did eliminate repetitive code versus simply using a loop? Using an extension method seems a bit overkill.

  • 0

How does what you did eliminate repetitive code versus simply using a loop? Using an extension method seems a bit overkill.

Assuming he's doing some operation that involves getting the values of all textboxes indistinctly (like a sum or an average), a loop is the obvious solution, but from his code example I gathered he wants to do operations involving specific textboxes and is wondering how to avoid having to write the double.TryParse boilerplate every time. Maybe I just misinterpreted though, anyway the loop solution was already given by others here.
  • 0

Assuming he's doing some operation that involves getting the values of all textboxes indistinctly (like a sum or an average), a loop is the obvious solution, but from his code example I gathered he wants to do operations involving specific textboxes and is wondering how to avoid having to write the double.TryParse boilerplate every time. Maybe I just misinterpreted though, anyway the loop solution was already given by others here.

Actually yeah I see your point now; the first code snippet in the OP seems to suggest arbitrary calculations while the later code snippets suggest otherwise. Interesting.

  • 0

I wonder if the textboxes are the right way to do this afterall?

This application will have 50 textboxes and user inputs values 1-5. Two buttons, calculate and clear. After the calculations it shows a the results of 8 calculations and also a graph.

I first thought I do it with popup dialog but then decided to use textboxes so that user can check the entered values but it will have alot of textboxes...

Any ideas?

  • 0
I wonder if the textboxes are the right way to do this afterall? This application will have 50 textboxes and user inputs values 1-5. Two buttons, calculate and clear. After the calculations it shows a the results of 8 calculations and also a graph. I first thought I do it with popup dialog but then decided to use textboxes so that user can check the entered values but it will have alot of textboxes... Any ideas?
So the user has 5 values to enter and you want to display the result of 8 calculations. Why do you need 50 different fields for that?

I'm not too familiar with Winforms but if you have a lot of data it's usually better to display it with some kind of list control, perhaps DataGrid or ListView.

  • 0

So the user has 5 values to enter and you want to display the result of 8 calculations. Why do you need 50 different fields for that?

I'm not too familiar with Winforms but if you have a lot of data it's usually better to display it with some kind of list control, perhaps DataGrid or ListView.

I meant user needs to enter value 1-5 for every textbox.

  • 0

Ok so you have 8 different calculations that all require 5 inputs for the user and a field to display the result, if I understand correctly. So you could design a UserControl that has 5 input fields and a result field, and use that 8 times with a different equation passed in as a parameter. The equation could be a five-argument Func where the arguments are the 5 different textbox values. Does that make any sense for you?

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Edifier's popular R1280Ts bookshelf speaker can be a nice upgrade for your PC desktop audio by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a very nice discount on Sony's high-resolution SS-CS5M2 speakers, which are currently on sale for just $178. It packs the rather rare super tweeter that offers an additional level of clarity and "airy"-ness which a tweeter cannot provide. It's a passive speaker though which means it will require external amplification, which will cost extra. Let's say though that you have a budget of under $150 but still want a decent-sounding speaker that's active. The Edifier 1280Ts can help in this regard, as the unit is currently at a decent price of $130 (purchase link under the specs table down below). While you will not get deep sub-bass from the 1280Ts, you should get clearer vocals and highs like cymbals than a cheaper satellite-based 2.1 system. Obviously the soundstage and imaging will also improve due to the better reproduction of highs. As mentioned above, the Edifier R1280Ts is active and so does not need a separate amplifier, as it's a powered system with its own amplification. A great thing about this model is that you can add a separate active subwoofer to it too using the "sub out" option, which essentially acts like an LFE. This way, you can add in the missing deep bass. The technical specifications of the Edifier R1280Ts are given in the table below: Specification Value Total Output Power 42W RMS (21W + 21W) Driver Units 4-inch mid-range/bass driver + 0.5-inch silk diaphragm treble driver Frequency Response 52Hz – 20kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) ≥85dBA Input Sensitivity Line In1: R/L: 500±50mV Line In2: R/L: 700±50mV Inputs Dual RCA inputs Outputs Sub Out port for external subwoofer Get it at the link below: Edifier R1280Ts Powered Bookshelf Speakers - 2.0 Stereo Active Near Field Monitors with Subwoofer Line Out: $129.99 (Sold by Edifier Online Store, Shipped by Amazon US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Appreciate the focus on UI performance, but this is going the wrong way. Instead of optimizing performance, coding to lower latency, etc. this is just throwing horsepower. This is lazy.
    • I agree, but that's the popular online opinion about them, so I followed it. I do think they have their point, no matter how combative they sound most of the time.
    • M$ can bring whatever the hell it wants, and then guess what's not installed in my Mac.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      489
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!