• 0

web storage works offline, but not online


Question

hello

i have a site where i use web storage ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_storage ) and it works offline but when i put it online, it doesnt work. vry very strange. a server cannot limit if i use web storage or not rite??? its works offline on all browsers when it is on my local server but when on online, it doesnt work.

wat could be rong????

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I use both local and session storage objects in my applications; are the domains different from offline and online? If you set a key value pair when browsing localhost, then you will not be able to access them when you are browsing www.yoursite.com (and vice-versa).

subdomains are also subject to this; web.yoursite.come can not access mail.yoursite.com objects.

  • 0

I use both local and session storage objects in my applications; are the domains different from offline and online? If you set a key value pair when browsing localhost, then you will not be able to access them when you are browsing www.yoursite.com (and vice-versa).

subdomains are also subject to this; web.yoursite.come can not access mail.yoursite.com objects.

no.

on local i use: example.ex/something and example.ex/somethingelse that works (on both)

online i use (for the same above): something.example.com and somethingelse.example.com that does not work (on either)

my feeling is that indeed that ****ing subdomain has sumthin to do with it. any workaround????

  • 0

You could move your localStorage code to the root domain (so example.com), then embed the code through an iframe on both subdomains, and send messages between the two documents as a way to do it.

do u have anywhere i can see examples or tutorials or more indepth information?

thank u

  • 0

http://www.nczonline...n-localstorage/

Edit: You'll want to ensure that no other sites can embed the code and issue commands to your code, it covers it in the article but it won't hurt to mention it again.

:laugh: this is the same exact page i looked up when i posted about maybe subdomains being a pain.....

i have several problems with that implementation......*sighs* im not sure this is going to be easy as the situation is kind of complicated.

my root domain is tecnically a subdomain....so thats going to be problematic.

if you have sum time to spare (and want to), The_Decryptor, a 1 on 1 pm session wud be nice and helpful.

tanks to all for the advice and comments

  • 0

Well, if you're in the situation where you don't control the root domain, only the subdomains, then you'd have to have one "master" subdomain, and have the second subdomain use that for storage (Using the same postMessage setup as you would use for subdomain > domain communication)

  • 0

Well, if you're in the situation where you don't control the root domain, only the subdomains, then you'd have to have one "master" subdomain, and have the second subdomain use that for storage (Using the same postMessage setup as you would use for subdomain > domain communication)

so it wud be the same implementation? ok will give it a go and see if sumthin explodes.

btw this also works on my local rite? ill implement in first in my local then pass it...

  • 0

got it to work (had some stuff to do)

i just have a very noob javascript question:


/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");

});
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + value);
/*javascript down here*/
[/CODE]

pretty selfexplains....i want to use value on the onside of that little variable/function (for example in that thing that says alert 2). how to do it????

  • 0

Should work, but not tested:

/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
		 value = remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
		 alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");
		 return value;

		 });
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + value);
/*javascript down here*/

  • 0

/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorageValue = "";
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
                 remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
                 alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");
                 remoteStorageValue = value;
                 });
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + remoteStorageValue);
/*javascript down here*/

You have to set the global value within the callback function, returning it won't work (Since you're assigning the return of "requestValue" to the variable, not the value of the callback which can happen at a later time)

  • 0

/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorageValue = "";
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
				 remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
				 alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");
				 remoteStorageValue = value;
				 });
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + remoteStorageValue);
/*javascript down here*/

You have to set the global value within the callback function, returning it won't work (Since you're assigning the return of "requestValue" to the variable, not the value of the callback which can happen at a later time)

i changed it to that code and it says that RemoteStorageValue ' s value is simply undefined

  • 0

It shouldn't say that since the first line sets it to "", which is different from undefined.

There is another issue of course, the second alert will fire before the callback could/will, so it won't see the value that the callback will.

  • 0

It shouldn't say that since the first line sets it to "", which is different from undefined.

There is another issue of course, the second alert will fire before the callback could/will, so it won't see the value that the callback will.

well it is undefined.....tried putting a word and same thing.

and that other issue you mentioned, may have to do with it:

there are 2 lines:

alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");

alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + remoteStorageValue);

well alert 2 pops up before "the value for...." so I imagine it is because of what you mentioned. how do i fix it???

  • 0

The only way to fix it is to structure your code such that you don't try reading the value directly after issuing the cross domain call. Even if it execute instantly, JavaScript won't call your callback function until after the current function has finished executing.

If you separate your code into 2 different sections, one which asks for information and one that processes it, you could just make the first part issue the cross-domain call, and have the callback function invoke the second part of your code.

  • 0

The only way to fix it is to structure your code such that you don't try reading the value directly after issuing the cross domain call. Even if it execute instantly, JavaScript won't call your callback function until after the current function has finished executing.

If you separate your code into 2 different sections, one which asks for information and one that processes it, you could just make the first part issue the cross-domain call, and have the callback function invoke the second part of your code.

Well the only thing that comes to mind is sumkind of "sleep" function after running that cross domain call. tis will give it enough time to finish and will be able to get the valuer rite?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good move IMHO no matter who is running the administration. We need checks and balances on this stuff especially concerning bleeding edge models. China and others that depend greatly on stolen IP will weaponize it ASAP if they get access. The same effort needs to be applied by the SEC concerning all of this circular funding of AI companies and BS financial reporting as well.
    • Microsoft kills AI-powered history search feature in Edge by Usama Jawad In June 2025, Microsoft began rolling out AI-powered history search functionality with Edge 138. The idea was simple: allow customers to use natural language phrases and synonyms to find their desired history items rather than matching keywords exactly. Although the company had already rolled out this capability in a phased manner, it has now decided to cancel it. In an update on its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has announced that it has decided not to move forward with AI-powered history search. The company has not detailed the exact reasoning behind this move, but it has apologized to customers for the inconvenience. The move is rather interesting as it seemingly could have improved user productivity. Edge users wouldn't have to worry about typos or exact keywords, and just focus on what they were trying to locate in their browser history. Microsoft had also assured users that an on-device AI model would be leveraged for this functionality, and no data would be sent to the cloud. IT admins also had the ability to control its availability through the EdgeHistoryAISearchEnabled policy. When the feature began rolling out last year, many of our readers called it creepy, noting that they couldn't trust Microsoft to keep their data on their device. Others also questioned its usefulness, saying that it's simply a way for Microsoft to insert more AI bloat into its products. Although the Redmond tech giant had stated that it will be more mindful about surfacing Copilot features in Windows 11 apps, we later discussed how this is mostly a rebranding exercise rather than an actual axing of AI functionalities. Indeed, a Microsoft executive later emphasized how they want to reshape Windows for the agentic AI era. That said, it does seem like at least AI-powered Edge history search isn't a part of that vision.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!