• 0

web storage works offline, but not online


Question

hello

i have a site where i use web storage ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_storage ) and it works offline but when i put it online, it doesnt work. vry very strange. a server cannot limit if i use web storage or not rite??? its works offline on all browsers when it is on my local server but when on online, it doesnt work.

wat could be rong????

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I use both local and session storage objects in my applications; are the domains different from offline and online? If you set a key value pair when browsing localhost, then you will not be able to access them when you are browsing www.yoursite.com (and vice-versa).

subdomains are also subject to this; web.yoursite.come can not access mail.yoursite.com objects.

  • 0

I use both local and session storage objects in my applications; are the domains different from offline and online? If you set a key value pair when browsing localhost, then you will not be able to access them when you are browsing www.yoursite.com (and vice-versa).

subdomains are also subject to this; web.yoursite.come can not access mail.yoursite.com objects.

no.

on local i use: example.ex/something and example.ex/somethingelse that works (on both)

online i use (for the same above): something.example.com and somethingelse.example.com that does not work (on either)

my feeling is that indeed that ****ing subdomain has sumthin to do with it. any workaround????

  • 0

You could move your localStorage code to the root domain (so example.com), then embed the code through an iframe on both subdomains, and send messages between the two documents as a way to do it.

do u have anywhere i can see examples or tutorials or more indepth information?

thank u

  • 0

http://www.nczonline...n-localstorage/

Edit: You'll want to ensure that no other sites can embed the code and issue commands to your code, it covers it in the article but it won't hurt to mention it again.

:laugh: this is the same exact page i looked up when i posted about maybe subdomains being a pain.....

i have several problems with that implementation......*sighs* im not sure this is going to be easy as the situation is kind of complicated.

my root domain is tecnically a subdomain....so thats going to be problematic.

if you have sum time to spare (and want to), The_Decryptor, a 1 on 1 pm session wud be nice and helpful.

tanks to all for the advice and comments

  • 0

Well, if you're in the situation where you don't control the root domain, only the subdomains, then you'd have to have one "master" subdomain, and have the second subdomain use that for storage (Using the same postMessage setup as you would use for subdomain > domain communication)

  • 0

Well, if you're in the situation where you don't control the root domain, only the subdomains, then you'd have to have one "master" subdomain, and have the second subdomain use that for storage (Using the same postMessage setup as you would use for subdomain > domain communication)

so it wud be the same implementation? ok will give it a go and see if sumthin explodes.

btw this also works on my local rite? ill implement in first in my local then pass it...

  • 0

got it to work (had some stuff to do)

i just have a very noob javascript question:


/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");

});
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + value);
/*javascript down here*/
[/CODE]

pretty selfexplains....i want to use value on the onside of that little variable/function (for example in that thing that says alert 2). how to do it????

  • 0

Should work, but not tested:

/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
		 value = remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
		 alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");
		 return value;

		 });
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + value);
/*javascript down here*/

  • 0

/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorageValue = "";
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
                 remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
                 alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");
                 remoteStorageValue = value;
                 });
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + remoteStorageValue);
/*javascript down here*/

You have to set the global value within the callback function, returning it won't work (Since you're assigning the return of "requestValue" to the variable, not the value of the callback which can happen at a later time)

  • 0

/*java script up here*/
var remoteStorageValue = "";
var remoteStorage = new CrossDomainStorage("http://example.dev", "/server.html");
				 remoteStorage.requestValue("lookforme", function(key, value){
				 alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");
				 remoteStorageValue = value;
				 });
alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + remoteStorageValue);
/*javascript down here*/

You have to set the global value within the callback function, returning it won't work (Since you're assigning the return of "requestValue" to the variable, not the value of the callback which can happen at a later time)

i changed it to that code and it says that RemoteStorageValue ' s value is simply undefined

  • 0

It shouldn't say that since the first line sets it to "", which is different from undefined.

There is another issue of course, the second alert will fire before the callback could/will, so it won't see the value that the callback will.

  • 0

It shouldn't say that since the first line sets it to "", which is different from undefined.

There is another issue of course, the second alert will fire before the callback could/will, so it won't see the value that the callback will.

well it is undefined.....tried putting a word and same thing.

and that other issue you mentioned, may have to do with it:

there are 2 lines:

alert("The value for '" + key + "' is '" + value + "'");

alert ("alert 2 : I want to print/use value on the outside" + remoteStorageValue);

well alert 2 pops up before "the value for...." so I imagine it is because of what you mentioned. how do i fix it???

  • 0

The only way to fix it is to structure your code such that you don't try reading the value directly after issuing the cross domain call. Even if it execute instantly, JavaScript won't call your callback function until after the current function has finished executing.

If you separate your code into 2 different sections, one which asks for information and one that processes it, you could just make the first part issue the cross-domain call, and have the callback function invoke the second part of your code.

  • 0

The only way to fix it is to structure your code such that you don't try reading the value directly after issuing the cross domain call. Even if it execute instantly, JavaScript won't call your callback function until after the current function has finished executing.

If you separate your code into 2 different sections, one which asks for information and one that processes it, you could just make the first part issue the cross-domain call, and have the callback function invoke the second part of your code.

Well the only thing that comes to mind is sumkind of "sleep" function after running that cross domain call. tis will give it enough time to finish and will be able to get the valuer rite?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
    • When Windows 7 was released I created an AutoHotkey script that uses Alt+` as a keyboard shortcut to move a window across monitors. I have been using that script for over 15 years and this is the first time I have come across another app that uses the same shortcut!
    • I called it last year that they wouldn't end support when they said there would. There are too many people still on Windows 10 waiting for something better to upgrade to and 11 ain't it! The recent promises of fixing Windows 11's many problems is nice, but unless they deliver on those promises in a big way then I expect customers will still want to stick with 10.
    • Full ACK. I went too far adressing your post specifically. And as you said, it up to us customers as participant of the market dynamic as it happens to decide whether we spend our money on a product or not. The responsibility is to the company. In case of this price hike one could assume that MS is expecting or even starting to see a new interest in XBox hardware so they want to avoid losses per unit sold. I find it fair enough that they granted a period in which everyone interested could grab a unit for the current price (Amazon.de has a reliable stock of XBox Series X digital, which I bought last December after having sold my day one Series X a year ago). It is not that they cash up their customers starting on Monday. Cheers and let's cling to our perfectly fine hardware as long as we deem it worthy in relation to purchasing something new!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      414
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!