Recommended Posts

Hi,

This might be a pretty dumb question, but since I google very different answers I prefer to make it sure and ask the "pro" guys here. :)

Recently I upgraded my notebook to 4GB of ram, and since x86 version of windows does not support it, max 3GB, i need to reinstall it. Windows 7 is not completely 100% recognize my hardware (sound), so I can only install WinXP or Vista. Vista is horrible, I really dont like it, so I'm left behind with WinXP x64, but does that support 4GB of ram or not?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1083921-windows-xp-pro-x64-4gb-ram/
Share on other sites

What model is your notebook, there must be a way of getting hold of drivers for W7, because like everyone says, XP64 was not that great.

It's an MSI S262 laptop, with core duo. It's still runs smoothly. But since MSI only released drivers for XP/Vista. I really tried everything the get the audio working, but no matter where I try to get the drivers are not working, or just S/PDIF is recognize by it also with the default win7 driver = resulting no sound what so ever, I can't live a with a silent PC. :(

Yeah but XP x86 is just as horrible as Vista depending on who you talk to. It never really was that stable.

Well, XP is doing the job since more then 10 years, so it's alternative deal more then Vista, obv Microsoft discontinued the support for it, while XP is still supported, for all the low profile PC-s out there.

Yes, up to 128 GB of RAM.

Thanks. Then I will install it.

Btw, wasn't the 64bit version of XP a long time beta staged operation system? Is there a final/stable version of it?

It's not beta, but XP x64 never ran well. My only concern is where are you going to get x64 drivers from if they only have x86? I see nothing but x86 listed on the site.

If you need more from the notebook, it might be time for a new machine.

Driver's are going to be the big potential issue. Not many hardware manufactures wanted to make XP 64bit drivers.

They did with Vista, but some still never did XP 64bit.

Note: Service Pack 2 for XP 64 bit is the equivalent of Service Pack 3 for XP (32bit).

When XP 64bit launched, it already included SP1 code in it. It came out after XP 32 bit.

(Edit) Grammer

It's not beta, but XP x64 never ran well. My only concern is where are you going to get x64 drivers from if they only have x86? I see nothing but x86 listed on the site.

If you need more from the notebook, it might be time for a new machine.

Driver's are going to be the big potential issue. Not many wanted hardware manufactures wanted to make XP 64bit drivers.

They did with Vista, but some still never did XP 64bit.

Note: Service Pack 2 for XP 64 bit is the equivalent of Service Pack 3 for XP (32bit).

When XP 64bit launched, it already included SP1 code in it. It came out after XP 32 bit.

Seriously, no idea. I don't know, but I was hoping that the 32bit XP drivers would do the job even if the OS is actually 64bit. Or is this a total bad idea?

If so, then my only really working choose is Vista, since it works almost out-of-the-box perfectly for the notebook, which would make me sad to have to go back to vista.

32-bit drivers only work on.. 32-bit OS.

Make sure you have 64-bit XP drivers.

Also make sure that you are up to date - all the updates and stuff, IE8 (even if you don't use it, update it!!!), and so forth.

32-bit drivers only work on.. 32-bit OS.

Make sure you have 64-bit XP drivers.

Also make sure that you are up to date - all the updates and stuff, IE8 (even if you don't use it, update it!!!), and so forth.

Well, then I just hope that XP recognizes all the hardware properly. Usually a never had to install for XP drivers, but ofc I did, due to they offer advanced customization, etc.

Seriously, no idea. I don't know, but I was hoping that the 32bit XP drivers would do the job even if the OS is actually 64bit. Or is this a total bad idea?

If so, then my only really working choose is Vista, since it works almost out-of-the-box perfectly for the notebook, which would make me sad to have to go back to vista.

Check manufacture web site and see if they have the XP64 bit drivers.

And if not on your OEM'ss site, for example it's an intel motherboard, check intel's web site for your motherboard chipset xp 64 bit drivers.

You might get lucky and it detects hardware correctly,

Check manufacture web site and see if they have the XP64 bit drivers.

And if not on your OEM'ss site, for example it's an intel motherboard, check intel's web site for your motherboard chipset xp 64 bit drivers.

You might get lucky and it detects hardware correctly,

Maybe then audio will be a problem also (in XP), but a really hope not.

If audio HD is the only thing that isn't working, try the drivers from the audio chip, ALC888 website (http://www.realtek.com.tw)

Hi,

This might be a pretty dumb question, but since I google very different answers I prefer to make it sure and ask the "pro" guys here. :)

Recently I upgraded my notebook to 4GB of ram, and since x86 version of windows does not support it, max 3GB, i need to reinstall it. Windows 7 is not completely 100% recognize my hardware (sound), so I can only install WinXP or Vista. Vista is horrible, I really dont like it, so I'm left behind with WinXP x64, but does that support 4GB of ram or not?

Thanks

I'd recommend that you stray away from x64 Windows XP. It's truly an unstable mess and you'll almost certainly have a drivers nightmare. If you absolutely can't get 7 to work, Vista is actually fine now with the service packs available. I'd recommend it over XP at this point.

  • Like 1
Windows 7 is not completely 100% recognize my hardware (sound), so I can only install WinXP or Vista. Vista is horrible, I really dont like it, so I'm left behind with WinXP x64, but does that support 4GB of ram or not? Thanks

Don't do WinXP x64, just go with Vista x64, turn off Aero Glass and think of it as Win7 x64 pre-release. Vista x64 is way more stable and has far better WoW64 support than Xp x64.

It's an MSI S262 laptop,

You might be in luck then. According to the MSI site download page here - http://www.msi.com/product/nb/S262.html#/?div=Driver&os=Vista%2032

your audio is the Realtek ALC888

Well.. I went to the Realtek website and they offer Windows 7 64 bit drivers for it. Heres the link to get them - http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=14&PFid=24&Level=4&Conn=3&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false

(if that link doesnt go to the download directly, you want the 64bits Vista, Windows7, Windows8 Driver only (Executable file)

I verified in the readme that your chip is supported

--------

History:

--------

Driver Package R2.69

Realtek HD Audio Driver support all of Realtek HD Audio Codec .

1. Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 WHQL Supporting:

ALC882, ALC883, ALC885, ALC886, ALC887, ALC888, ALC889, ALC892, ALC899, ALC861VD, ALC660,

ALC662, ALC663, ALC665, ALC670, ALC671, ALC672, ALC676, ALC680, ALC221, ALC231, ALC260, ALC262,

ALC267, ALC268, ALC269, ALC270, ALC272, ALC273, ALC275, ALC276, ALC280, ALC282, ALC283, ALC290

  • Like 2

i don't why so many people say that XP64 was so unstable, it basically is Windows 2003 X64 and is rock solid, i ran it for years on 8GB of RAM. It has the WOW32 on it so it will run your 32bit apps no problem at all. I used to develop software (Delphi which was 32bit and SQL Server) and edit images with illustrator and photoshop. It was lean and must more stable / faster than XP

The drawbacks with XP64 was that you basically needed XP64 or Win2k3 X64 drivers for your hardware and most antivirus wouldn't run on it because it thought it was the server edition.

Like i said i found it really good and missed Vista x64 as i found that a lot more unstable and sluggish and waited for Win7 x64 which is the best client x64 yet.

I would work on your sound card and see if you can find the drivers, either that or buy a cheap sound card, WinXP x64 is also a little bit of a pain to find as well.

PS if you use MS Office stick to the x86 version the x64 inc Office 2010 is a pain

  • Like 2

If you know what you're doing driver wise, there is nothing wrong with Win XP x64 vs 32bit XP. I ran it for several years and it was a stable gaming and media system, I did everything on it.

The issue with this laptop is that there may not be 64bit drivers for the card reader, bluetooth, and/or the MSI WiFi. If you have the Intel card you are fine however.

For Win 7 64bit sound, try: http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=14&PFid=24&Level=4&Conn=3&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false

If you can go Win7 x64 or even Vista x64 over XP x64.

Well, I will avoid multi quote for now, due to so many replies. Thank you all.

@Spyder: Well, thanks for the look up. I already tried that driver from realtek's website, and the result was the same, i just get the S/RDIF to be recognized, nothing else. So this might not be an issue with the driver, rather with Win7 itselt or I don't know. As sad, in vista audio works out of the box, just as with XP, I only install to get a better volume control. So I really don't know what's the issue with that. Is there any tool where I could provide data/screenshot to get this figured out, because it seems like I prematurely assumed this is a driver problem.

OMG....this is getting weird, some people say XP64 is crap, some say its rock solid, now I'm confused. So if that driver issue would be solved, then there would be no reason to go XP64, Win7 stand above all obv and would be my choose aswell.

*Btw, I tried a bunch of stuff to get the audio working, deleted hardware, installed just inf, every little trick that I've known so far, but really nothing helped. Audio is working, because I boot up XP and there it is, so there is nothing wrong with the chip hardware wise. Any trick how I could figure this out? Damn, should have made this post in the driver support section seem like. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!