Recommended Posts

Hi,

This might be a pretty dumb question, but since I google very different answers I prefer to make it sure and ask the "pro" guys here. :)

Recently I upgraded my notebook to 4GB of ram, and since x86 version of windows does not support it, max 3GB, i need to reinstall it. Windows 7 is not completely 100% recognize my hardware (sound), so I can only install WinXP or Vista. Vista is horrible, I really dont like it, so I'm left behind with WinXP x64, but does that support 4GB of ram or not?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1083921-windows-xp-pro-x64-4gb-ram/
Share on other sites

What model is your notebook, there must be a way of getting hold of drivers for W7, because like everyone says, XP64 was not that great.

It's an MSI S262 laptop, with core duo. It's still runs smoothly. But since MSI only released drivers for XP/Vista. I really tried everything the get the audio working, but no matter where I try to get the drivers are not working, or just S/PDIF is recognize by it also with the default win7 driver = resulting no sound what so ever, I can't live a with a silent PC. :(

Yeah but XP x86 is just as horrible as Vista depending on who you talk to. It never really was that stable.

Well, XP is doing the job since more then 10 years, so it's alternative deal more then Vista, obv Microsoft discontinued the support for it, while XP is still supported, for all the low profile PC-s out there.

Yes, up to 128 GB of RAM.

Thanks. Then I will install it.

Btw, wasn't the 64bit version of XP a long time beta staged operation system? Is there a final/stable version of it?

It's not beta, but XP x64 never ran well. My only concern is where are you going to get x64 drivers from if they only have x86? I see nothing but x86 listed on the site.

If you need more from the notebook, it might be time for a new machine.

Driver's are going to be the big potential issue. Not many hardware manufactures wanted to make XP 64bit drivers.

They did with Vista, but some still never did XP 64bit.

Note: Service Pack 2 for XP 64 bit is the equivalent of Service Pack 3 for XP (32bit).

When XP 64bit launched, it already included SP1 code in it. It came out after XP 32 bit.

(Edit) Grammer

It's not beta, but XP x64 never ran well. My only concern is where are you going to get x64 drivers from if they only have x86? I see nothing but x86 listed on the site.

If you need more from the notebook, it might be time for a new machine.

Driver's are going to be the big potential issue. Not many wanted hardware manufactures wanted to make XP 64bit drivers.

They did with Vista, but some still never did XP 64bit.

Note: Service Pack 2 for XP 64 bit is the equivalent of Service Pack 3 for XP (32bit).

When XP 64bit launched, it already included SP1 code in it. It came out after XP 32 bit.

Seriously, no idea. I don't know, but I was hoping that the 32bit XP drivers would do the job even if the OS is actually 64bit. Or is this a total bad idea?

If so, then my only really working choose is Vista, since it works almost out-of-the-box perfectly for the notebook, which would make me sad to have to go back to vista.

32-bit drivers only work on.. 32-bit OS.

Make sure you have 64-bit XP drivers.

Also make sure that you are up to date - all the updates and stuff, IE8 (even if you don't use it, update it!!!), and so forth.

32-bit drivers only work on.. 32-bit OS.

Make sure you have 64-bit XP drivers.

Also make sure that you are up to date - all the updates and stuff, IE8 (even if you don't use it, update it!!!), and so forth.

Well, then I just hope that XP recognizes all the hardware properly. Usually a never had to install for XP drivers, but ofc I did, due to they offer advanced customization, etc.

Seriously, no idea. I don't know, but I was hoping that the 32bit XP drivers would do the job even if the OS is actually 64bit. Or is this a total bad idea?

If so, then my only really working choose is Vista, since it works almost out-of-the-box perfectly for the notebook, which would make me sad to have to go back to vista.

Check manufacture web site and see if they have the XP64 bit drivers.

And if not on your OEM'ss site, for example it's an intel motherboard, check intel's web site for your motherboard chipset xp 64 bit drivers.

You might get lucky and it detects hardware correctly,

Check manufacture web site and see if they have the XP64 bit drivers.

And if not on your OEM'ss site, for example it's an intel motherboard, check intel's web site for your motherboard chipset xp 64 bit drivers.

You might get lucky and it detects hardware correctly,

Maybe then audio will be a problem also (in XP), but a really hope not.

If audio HD is the only thing that isn't working, try the drivers from the audio chip, ALC888 website (http://www.realtek.com.tw)

Hi,

This might be a pretty dumb question, but since I google very different answers I prefer to make it sure and ask the "pro" guys here. :)

Recently I upgraded my notebook to 4GB of ram, and since x86 version of windows does not support it, max 3GB, i need to reinstall it. Windows 7 is not completely 100% recognize my hardware (sound), so I can only install WinXP or Vista. Vista is horrible, I really dont like it, so I'm left behind with WinXP x64, but does that support 4GB of ram or not?

Thanks

I'd recommend that you stray away from x64 Windows XP. It's truly an unstable mess and you'll almost certainly have a drivers nightmare. If you absolutely can't get 7 to work, Vista is actually fine now with the service packs available. I'd recommend it over XP at this point.

  • Like 1
Windows 7 is not completely 100% recognize my hardware (sound), so I can only install WinXP or Vista. Vista is horrible, I really dont like it, so I'm left behind with WinXP x64, but does that support 4GB of ram or not? Thanks

Don't do WinXP x64, just go with Vista x64, turn off Aero Glass and think of it as Win7 x64 pre-release. Vista x64 is way more stable and has far better WoW64 support than Xp x64.

It's an MSI S262 laptop,

You might be in luck then. According to the MSI site download page here - http://www.msi.com/product/nb/S262.html#/?div=Driver&os=Vista%2032

your audio is the Realtek ALC888

Well.. I went to the Realtek website and they offer Windows 7 64 bit drivers for it. Heres the link to get them - http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=14&PFid=24&Level=4&Conn=3&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false

(if that link doesnt go to the download directly, you want the 64bits Vista, Windows7, Windows8 Driver only (Executable file)

I verified in the readme that your chip is supported

--------

History:

--------

Driver Package R2.69

Realtek HD Audio Driver support all of Realtek HD Audio Codec .

1. Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 WHQL Supporting:

ALC882, ALC883, ALC885, ALC886, ALC887, ALC888, ALC889, ALC892, ALC899, ALC861VD, ALC660,

ALC662, ALC663, ALC665, ALC670, ALC671, ALC672, ALC676, ALC680, ALC221, ALC231, ALC260, ALC262,

ALC267, ALC268, ALC269, ALC270, ALC272, ALC273, ALC275, ALC276, ALC280, ALC282, ALC283, ALC290

  • Like 2

i don't why so many people say that XP64 was so unstable, it basically is Windows 2003 X64 and is rock solid, i ran it for years on 8GB of RAM. It has the WOW32 on it so it will run your 32bit apps no problem at all. I used to develop software (Delphi which was 32bit and SQL Server) and edit images with illustrator and photoshop. It was lean and must more stable / faster than XP

The drawbacks with XP64 was that you basically needed XP64 or Win2k3 X64 drivers for your hardware and most antivirus wouldn't run on it because it thought it was the server edition.

Like i said i found it really good and missed Vista x64 as i found that a lot more unstable and sluggish and waited for Win7 x64 which is the best client x64 yet.

I would work on your sound card and see if you can find the drivers, either that or buy a cheap sound card, WinXP x64 is also a little bit of a pain to find as well.

PS if you use MS Office stick to the x86 version the x64 inc Office 2010 is a pain

  • Like 2

If you know what you're doing driver wise, there is nothing wrong with Win XP x64 vs 32bit XP. I ran it for several years and it was a stable gaming and media system, I did everything on it.

The issue with this laptop is that there may not be 64bit drivers for the card reader, bluetooth, and/or the MSI WiFi. If you have the Intel card you are fine however.

For Win 7 64bit sound, try: http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=14&PFid=24&Level=4&Conn=3&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false

If you can go Win7 x64 or even Vista x64 over XP x64.

Well, I will avoid multi quote for now, due to so many replies. Thank you all.

@Spyder: Well, thanks for the look up. I already tried that driver from realtek's website, and the result was the same, i just get the S/RDIF to be recognized, nothing else. So this might not be an issue with the driver, rather with Win7 itselt or I don't know. As sad, in vista audio works out of the box, just as with XP, I only install to get a better volume control. So I really don't know what's the issue with that. Is there any tool where I could provide data/screenshot to get this figured out, because it seems like I prematurely assumed this is a driver problem.

OMG....this is getting weird, some people say XP64 is crap, some say its rock solid, now I'm confused. So if that driver issue would be solved, then there would be no reason to go XP64, Win7 stand above all obv and would be my choose aswell.

*Btw, I tried a bunch of stuff to get the audio working, deleted hardware, installed just inf, every little trick that I've known so far, but really nothing helped. Audio is working, because I boot up XP and there it is, so there is nothing wrong with the chip hardware wise. Any trick how I could figure this out? Damn, should have made this post in the driver support section seem like. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!