• 0

iTunes for XP?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
WMP doesn't play nice with AAC files. You can download the Direct Show codecs over at 3ivx, associate M4A files with WMP and then double click your favorite AAC file and it should play (after asking you if the file is safe).

I imagine someone will get around to writting a WMA plugin for quicktime on windows, but at the moment the only apps I know that can deal with windows media files are xine, mplayer, and vlc - none of those have quicktime compatible plugins. Until this time Windows users had no real need for quicktime to do more than just play MOV files.

Without sounding too much like a jerk: this is the issue of encoding in non-standard audio formats. Using WMA puts up barriers to the non-windows world. Using Mpeg4 does the same, but the standard is well documented - so at least it was easy to make aac work on non-mac platforms.

If re-encoding using MP3 is an option for you - that might be something to consider. It will work everywhere, it's reasonably good quality/megabyte if you use LAME, and though not free - it's still free (as in beer).

So I can play AAC files in WMP, but can't put them in my library and stuff like that? I was looking forward to having AAC files on my comp since they're so much higher in quality than mp3s (space wise anyways) but I don't want to devote myself solely to iTunes, yet anyways.

  • 0

Fixed my issue that i had posted about earlyer. Seems i had a album that iTunes did not like so i removed it.

I then tried again to add my mp3 folder to the iTunes library and this time it worked perfect.

Also iTunes has not changed any of my folder or file names which is a good thing.

  • 0

This has a nice playlist layout but my god, it sure is a memory hog. IT is a CPU hog when Audio Enhancements are enabled. It adds 2 services that aren't even nessicary(iTunes Helper and iPod service). IT should only turn on the iPod service if you actually have drivers for an iPod installed on your system(meaning you have an iPod). At least you can disable the iPod Service which also disables the iTunes Helper. It doesn't automatically retrieve and display album art(you have to manually drag album art pics to the album art popup), It doesn't have a taskbar player and It doesn't even play video. I think I'll stick with WMP9.

post-12-1066348065.jpg

Edited by Zombie9920
  • 0
,Oct 16 2003, 22:33]
Anyone else having iTunes crash when adding a large folder of music to the library.

When i tell iTunes to add my mp3 folder which has well over 40 gigs in it, iTunes starts adding then after about a minute it crash's. If i add the folders one by one it has no problems but i'll damned if im adding that many folders maunally.

Will say that iTunes seems to have a much cleaner sound.

Yep, that happens to me too... I already uninstalled it, it?s not superior to WMP9 anyway.

Im not having any problem with adding large folders.

btw, care to explain how its not superior? :rolleyes::

1 - Well, for starters, apparently it has a bug (happened to somebody else that posted here, so it WILL happen to a lot of other people as well).

2 - And then it?s a slower, heavier piece of software than WMP9 (it also adds a service and a startup executable, whcih gobble up RAM). It doesn?t sound better than any of the media players I know IMO and the equalizer is pointless to me, as I like the sound as pure as it comes.

3 - Its media library philosophy is different from WMP?s but not better IMO, it?s a even a bit more confusing. It doesn?t retrieve Album cover art or media info from Mp3s, which is something that WMP does...

4- Also, it has that Mac look, which doesn?t combine with Windows at all.

It doesn?t have any feature that I need that WMP9 doesn?t have... and for the ones I need I?m better off with WMP.

  • 0
1 - Well, for starters, apparently it has a bug (happened to somebody else that posted here, so it WILL happen to a lot of other people as well).

Yeah, like WMP's security problems are the best display of programming in the world :rolleyes: I'm suprised a peice of software like this, developed in under a year, doesn't have more bugs, to be honest...

2 - And then it?s a slower, heavier piece of software than WMP9 (it also adds a service and a startup executable, whcih gobble up RAM). It doesn?t sound better than any of the media players I know IMO and the equalizer is pointless to me, as I like the sound as pure as it comes.
I'll give you this one, it's not as streamlined as WMP or other players, but it *is* new, so I think it's fair to give a chance in this regard.
3 - Its media library philosophy is different from WMP?s but not better IMO, it?s a even a bit more confusing. It doesn?t retrieve Album cover art or media info from Mp3s, which is something that WMP does...

I think the WMP way is confusing, personally. iTunes puts search and browse right next to each other. Browse is a three-paned format that narrows down choices as your select from left to right. It's a proven usable format, and you probably don't like it just because you're stuck thinking of WMP. Unfortunately, no matter how well you design the use of your applications, users may be stuck with another paradigm in mind. So, there's a hurdle to overcome there. Regardless, for people not as set in mind as yourself, the iTunes layout provides for more clear organization of your music without creating clutter (like the tree view of WMP can lead to very easily). Open up several trees in WMP and things start to get confusing from the end-user's perspective quickly, even though you may be used to it by now.

4- Also, it has that Mac look, which doesn?t combine with Windows at all.

Ok, so use a different theme or get over it. I could care less if it was purple and flashing as long as it plays the music I bought just fine. While there are options to spruce up our computer's appearance out there, as long as it's usable, it's done well, IMO.

  • 0

Usually Apple will go to the CLEAN versions of songs if they're on the front panel of the Music Store.

Here's an example of one... the 2Pac album.. if you click on the image on the front of the iTunes Music Store page, it'll take you to the clean version.

help1.jpg

and then select the correct version you would like to browse/download.

help2.jpg

and sometimes Singles will appear like this, so you can see what's what...

help3.jpg

Hope that helps.

  • 0

Can anyone help me, I am getting a error message that reads like this:

Unable to create InstallDriver instance,

Return code: -2147024894

that's why I clicked on the install icon. I ahve redownloaded just in case the file was curupted but no it still does the same thing. I have windows xp pro and a amd 2000+ with a 5600ultra.

  • 0
Yeah, like WMP's security problems are the best display of programming in the world :rolleyes: I'm suprised a peice of software like this, developed in under a year, doesn't have more bugs, to be honest...

I'll give you this one, it's not as streamlined as WMP or other players, but it *is* new, so I think it's fair to give a chance in this regard.

I think the WMP way is confusing, personally. iTunes puts search and browse right next to each other. Browse is a three-paned format that narrows down choices as your select from left to right. It's a proven usable format, and you probably don't like it just because you're stuck thinking of WMP. Unfortunately, no matter how well you design the use of your applications, users may be stuck with another paradigm in mind. So, there's a hurdle to overcome there. Regardless, for people not as set in mind as yourself, the iTunes layout provides for more clear organization of your music without creating clutter (like the tree view of WMP can lead to very easily). Open up several trees in WMP and things start to get confusing from the end-user's perspective quickly, even though you may be used to it by now.

Ok, so use a different theme or get over it. I could care less if it was purple and flashing as long as it plays the music I bought just fine. While there are options to spruce up our computer's appearance out there, as long as it's usable, it's done well, IMO.

Dude, he asked why I uninstalled it, and I answered him... a program that crashes in its first and every run is not promising... WMP9 is not perfect, but it works much better for me. We?re just in the first hours since ITunes?s launch... it might be more buggy than you think.

And if a program is purple and flashing... I?ll never use it:whistle:le:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!