taking ownership of files in win7 by formatting hdd


Recommended Posts

Dude -- I told you how to fix it.

Take freaking ownership and set the permissions.

Tell you want, let me TV in and it will be fixed in 2 minutes. Other than that - just format your box because this seems to be above your comprehension level.

"oddly i cant save anything on the desktop anymore and firefox wont open and the right click on desktop -"

Seems like you just dicking the pooch more and more as you attempt **** you do not understand.

I explained the problem - for him and the next 300 schmucks finding this thread, but somehow that offends him? Sorry he took it that way, but that is not my problem - nor do I really care.

Thought this was a tech forum, not a preschool.

  • Like 3

I explained the problem - for him and the next 300 schmucks finding this thread, but somehow that offends him? Sorry he took it that way, but that is not my problem - nor do I really care.

Thought this was a tech forum, not a preschool.

It's a school for the gifted..... 'gifted' being true for both meanings of the word ;)

I explained the problem - for him and the next 300 schmucks finding this thread, but somehow that offends him? Sorry he took it that way, but that is not my problem - nor do I really care.

Thought this was a tech forum, not a preschool.

It's not that, it's your tone.

Since you clearly can not hear my voice or see my facial expressions while you read my words - any tone you perceive is very subjective. I was asking questions and stating facts. Nothing more, nothing less.

A good tech knows when he's in over his head and it looks like you're in over your head. Follow BudMan's directions and all will be fine.

BudMan reminds me of our database administrator. He's knowledgeable and he'll tell you how to fix the problem but don't expect any sugar coating.

any tone you perceive is very subjective.

True. However, look at the following bits:

for him and the next 300 schmucks...
Take freaking ownership and set the permissions.

Seems like you just dicking the pooch more and more as you attempt **** you do not understand.

Come on really?? I would have to think that if your installing multiple OSes, that you tinker quite a bit.. And you don't even have a basic understanding of NTFS permissions?

Once you have a basic understanding, then you will no longer have these sorts of basic problems.

Now don't get me wrong, that last bit makes sense (basic understanding = avoidance of basic problems), but from the few pieces that I quoted you could also see how someone might take slight offence when they're trying to ask for help. However as you have rightly pointed out, tone is subjective with this medium of communication, and ultimately you're providing him with the answers that he needs.

Anyway, we're going off-track with this, let's stick to the original topic.

Schmucks was in reference to the future people finding this thread, not the OP looking for help and finding nothing but the OP nonsense.. Do they really need 300 lines of

ProgramData\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys\e917b9049b509516d9

086b7d95bfd1ba_b45e610c-8920-4c0f-bc9b-41dc73f5a36f: Access is denied.

Freaking was again after my original post - and after getting told that people must look down at me.

I offer information and help in fixing the issue - and I get attacked.. If anyone should offended at tone it should be me.

This topic should of been closed 2 pages back - take ownership and set the permissions. What else do you need to know?

If the OP wants it fixed, and can not figure it out then I am still open to TV in and fix it for him. There is little need to drag this thread on any longer - the information has been given. What else is there to say? If he is having problems looking up the instructions on how to take ownership.

Here;

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753659.aspx

Take Ownership of a File or Folder

True. However, look at the following bits:

Now don't get me wrong, that last bit makes sense (basic understanding = avoidance of basic problems), but from the few pieces that I quoted you could also see how someone might take slight offence when they're trying to ask for help. However as you have rightly pointed out, tone is subjective with this medium of communication, and ultimately you're providing him with the answers that he needs.

Anyway, we're going off-track with this, let's stick to the original topic.

Meh, forums are such that new members need to adjust and get to know the regulars, not the regulars have to tip-toe around the new guys :p

People have personalities, if people can't handle that well..... :D

<Post>

BudMan, don't get me wrong I understand. I was merely pointing out how in a subjective environment a phrase without tone can be construed in different ways. Ultimately I agree that you provided the necessary information for the OP to fix the problem.

Meh, forums are such that new members need to adjust and get to know the regulars, not the regulars have to tip-toe around the new guys :p

Very true. It took me a while to understand BudMan's tone when reading his replies.

Anyway, this problem seems to be sorted, unless the OP is still having troubles?

Can you open an Elevated Command Prompt (Right click CMD > Run as Admin) ?

If you can, do that and in CMD type: sfc /scannow

Then hit enter and let it run the scan, reboot and see if that improves anything

Also, in CMD, type: net user administrator /active:yes

Hit enter > log off > Administrator account will be shown > log into Admin account and try again

tried the admin account and cacls command still getting access denied.

didnt work not even from the admin account +listed as owner + icacls command + right click ownership. no go still stuck.

I had a problem a bit like this (a Windows Vista account, was getting access denied & other errors upon startup related to explorer.exe) where every time I tried to fix anything it either q/uq "worked" or it had access denied errors such that it was easier just to install the Win8 RP over it. So, just to clarify for everyone, you've -

  • gone into the administrator account
  • checked the file security ownerships/etc., you're an owner
  • used icacls to set yourself as the owner
  • used the right-click reg file to add "Take Ownership" to your right click menu, and did that on the files in question.

sorry if you've posted this info somewhere else in the thread and I just didn't see it, but

  • what error exactly do you get when you attempt to open one of those files?
  • if you right click it Properties -> Security what are the permissions for EVERYONE, your account, the administrator account, SYSTEM, etc.?
  • do you get an error when you try to Take Ownership and/or cacls other than Access is Denied?
  • noticed anything else weird lately? (like signs of a malware infection or something)

To be honest, I haven't tried this software out for myself, but maybe it will work wonders for you?:

http://www.zeus-software.com/downloads/ntfsaccess

i deal with far worse on a regular basis.

Yup!! Far Worse -- just yesterday there was this guy that could not follow instructions in a simple take ownership and set permissions problem. Vs posting anything actually useful to help in troubleshoot what he was doing wrong, like the actual commands he was doing. Or screen shots or exports of the permissions/ownership on the folders or files. He just complained about advice and information given.

He was able to post 300+ lines of "access denied" --- No **** access denied, really when your not a owner and you try to change permissions, what do you expect to happen ;)

I deal with this sort of person day in and day out, over and over and over again -- it can be exacerbating at times to be sure. But hey, its worth dealing with these types to every now and then actually help someone fix their issue, or better yet have them learn something in the process, best of all spark that flame in someone to actually learn something on their own and not lick off the silver spoon.

Luckily these types are not the majority, they format their boxes and move on without learning a thing. Sad really -- but hey, the next guy might actually learn something -- you can only hope!

oh btw -- this was a guy on a different forum, before you get your panties in a bunch ;)

Yup!! Far Worse -- just yesterday there was this guy that could not follow instructions in a simple take ownership and set permissions problem. Vs posting anything actually useful to help in troubleshoot what he was doing wrong, like the actual commands he was doing. Or screen shots or exports of the permissions/ownership on the folders or files. He just complained about advice and information given.

He was able to post 300+ lines of "access denied" --- No **** access denied, really when your not a owner and you try to change permissions, what do you expect to happen ;)

I deal with this sort of person day in and day out, over and over and over again -- it can be exacerbating at times to be sure. But hey, its worth dealing with these types to every now and then actually help someone fix their issue, or better yet have them learn something in the process, best of all spark that flame in someone to actually learn something on their own and not lick off the silver spoon.

Luckily these types are not the majority, they format their boxes and move on without learning a thing. Sad really -- but hey, the next guy might actually learn something -- you can only hope!

oh btw -- this was a guy on a different forum, before you get your panties in a bunch ;)

really budman.. have a chilled mug of beer mate! on we go with life!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!