Snapped SATA Connection on HDD, Can i replace with this?


Recommended Posts

Hey All,

When pulling out a sata cable from a hard drive, i was a bit to forceful and have broken the plastic connection from the hard drive, as you can see here...

ovZ54l.jpg

I'm wondering if i can unscrew the circuit board from the back of this hard drive and replace it with a known good working one off a drive of the same make?

This is the current drive...

uAhVOl.jpg

This is the spare drive...

1aemRl.jpg

And here they are side by side, will the circuit board on the right hard drive work on the one on the left?

aOn1Jl.jpg

I haven't done anything like this before to a hard drive so im very worried about this.

Thank You!

Nope it probably won't work.

You could probably get a replacement header, desolder the old one and replacement it but afaik it's all SMD soldering, so probably easiest to get someone else that's skilled to do it.

I'd probably say to attempt swapping the PCBs if they were both 500GB drives, but since one's 500GB and the other is 250GB, no, it won't work at all. The BIOS will see the drive as being a 250GB drive since that's what that PCB's firmware is for, so even if it did manage to function, your data would likely be screwed. I wouldn't bother.

Do you not have the old piece of plastic that snapped off? I'd personally attempt to glue it on and if I had to, glue a SATA cable in place.

You don't want to touch the srews on a hard drive. Without the correct torque on the screws it will destabilize the whole hard drive and it won't work at all.

Maybe you could glue a sata cable to the surrounding plastic as it seems the actual connector is intact.

I do have the plastic bit, it looks awkard to get it back in place and i dont want to get glue on the pins!

I have found this spare drive... its a 500GB but its firmware says HP12 though, hmmm im tempted to try, its only because this is my main machines hard drive thats all, i do have a backup, i just want to save myself the time of reinstalling everything if possible.

CK1m8l.jpg

i accidentially snapped a SATA connector, what i ended up having to do was Super Glue the plastic back aganst the metal, then transfered the data off it quick to another drive

i accidentially snapped a SATA connector, what i ended up having to do was Super Glue the plastic back aganst the metal, then transfered the data off it quick to another drive

I did something similar, I hot-melt glued a sata cable onto the drive and its been working perfectly for years (its on my secondary system with non-important data, so I was fine experimenting)

Just plug in the other drive (or any other drive you want to replace it with) without changing any PCBs around, then just restore your data from backup.

Thats the last resort imo, i want to try and fix it first, if it doesnt work, then ill restore the data onto a new drive, not one of these spares.

It won't work. You need to find another drive or PCB that's exactly like what you have. The firmware # also needs to be the same.

Depending on how long you have used the drive, finding the nearly exact PCB match may not work either, especially on modern drives. Modern drives store unique calibration data. As the drive ages, the calibration data becomes even more unique. The best chance to do a PCB swap is when the differences between the calibration data are as small as possible (in other words, when the drives are brand new).

If i try and replace the board, with that spare drives one, is there a chance it will corrupt / blow up the drive beyond repair?

They don't even match. Of course, you are gonna have a bad time.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!