Recommended Posts

hi,

I am not really a linux guy, but my boss asked me to setup a new open source linux mail server.

I did some research about sendmail, postfix, squirrelmail, exim and qmail. I'm wondering if anyone has personal experience on setting this up?

Maybe someone can help me guide on this, maybe shed some light what can be the best mail server to use, and the one that would be easiest to maintain (less scripting and coding)..

The mail server will be serving atleast 70 users.

Thanks in advanced guys!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1088219-help-on-setting-up-a-mail-server/
Share on other sites

Save yourself time and effort, get; http://www.zimbra.co...pen-source.html

Especially since you're completely fresh and don't know what you're doing.

You'll need RHEL, SLES, Ubuntu LTS, Debian or Fedora to install it - it has extensive documentation and help available.

Save yourself time and effort, get; http://www.zimbra.co...pen-source.html

Especially since you're completely fresh and don't know what you're doing.

You'll need RHEL, SLES, Ubuntu LTS, Debian or Fedora to install it - it has extensive documentation and help available.

Thanks for the link brother.

I actually have some experience with ubuntu desktop, only as a user though. No scripting and server administration.. :)

I think I would try to use ubuntu or fedora first.

Will it work in desktop version?

I actually work here as a network engr, but our system admin guy has resigned only last week and still no replacement so my hod ask me to take care some of his pending works

and that includes the mail server installation on our remote site.

The linux mail server would need to connect to our exchange 2003 mail server and then finally be routed outside with our mail gateway (a trend micro virtual appliance).

I am doing the initial setup now, hopefully it would work as expected.

What do you think?

Oh wait - so you actually are setting up a relay and not a complete mail system?

The setup would be like this:

The remote site with ~70users will be using open source mail server. The HQ is using exchange 2003 as mail server and AD as the user directory. The remote site have a separate subdomain name and every email transactions outside in public would need to transit on the headquarters. It would be like in microsoft, we would configure a routing group to connect this two sites. An ipsec tunnel is configured to connect this two sites.

So with the linux mail server, I am not sure how to do this.

Lets say a user from the remote site, user A, sends an email on a public domain gmail.com. The email will be received by the linux mail server (zimbra in our case), and it would need to be routed or relayed to our exchange server in HQ then finally to the smtp gateway (trend micro appliance)..

Let me know brother if you need more info, as I really need help for this one..

Why not just setup the subdomain on the windows 2003 server that is hosting exchange as well, and do it all from there. You run into alot of issues when trying the relay stuff over a VPN. (or ipsec tunnel) Maybe give them dedicated ports on the server machine through the firewall. Would save a crapload of headache

Why not just setup the subdomain on the windows 2003 server that is hosting exchange as well, and do it all from there. You run into alot of issues when trying the relay stuff over a VPN. (or ipsec tunnel) Maybe give them dedicated ports on the server machine through the firewall. Would save a crapload of headache

x2

Why not just setup the subdomain on the windows 2003 server that is hosting exchange as well, and do it all from there. You run into alot of issues when trying the relay stuff over a VPN. (or ipsec tunnel) Maybe give them dedicated ports on the server machine through the firewall. Would save a crapload of headache

I am really sorry bother, but I made an error on my previous post. Just did a phone call to my hod, and he said the remote site is a whole different domain..

And one of my colleague actually made some effort earlier on the meeting to just migrate all the users to our main exchange server to ease the process.

About the ipsec tunnel. Some of our smaller sites, which are mostly retail stores and small offices (same domain) are connected via ipsec and email traffic have no problems at all. Servers are all windows based (AD,dns and exchnage).

But then again brother, you might be right on this one, as I can not confirm this if it would also work on a linux mail server as it would my first time to deploy it, much less to configure it to relay (like a smart host) an email to a windows exchnge server.

I am doing some more research on zimbra, and some users says it supports AD and exchange integration.

But maybe there's some other options, for me to have a backup plan once zimbra fails to work on my side.

Makes no difference, use exchange...setup exchange anywhere (rpc over http(s)) and the users will still use outlook, connect to the mail server, and have everyone synced as if they were sitting there at the main site (as far as mail is concerned).

Actually, the very reason the upper management was opted to consider an open source is a strict budget.

I told them that this deployment might affect our current system and would generate issues instead of just setting up a new exchange server on the remote site.

And they told me its not possible with the current budget. The workstations will be planning to use ubuntu desktop, and most of those users are hotel crews and attendants which are only familiar on windows platform.

Makes no difference, use exchange...setup exchange anywhere (rpc over http(s)) and the users will still use outlook, connect to the mail server, and have everyone synced as if they were sitting there at the main site (as far as mail is concerned).

Yeah, at first I think using OWA would suffice. But the thing brother is, I just confirmed now, its a different domain and really not related on the company. It looks like the management made "some aggrement" with the other site, then agrees to offer services and that includes setting up a new mail server and maybe a small virtual infrastructure in a few coming months. I really don't know what is in the contract, but the initial phase of the project that was given to my team is to setup a mail server (front-end and back-end) using open source solutions..

Thanks for the reply. :)

Yes, I am planning to use ubuntu as I've seen on the zimbra website, they actually have a package built right in for ubuntu 10.04.

Anyways, sorry for a noob question, but in my case, 70 users/mailbox and hub and spoke topology, do you think there will be a "big difference" both in performance and stability if I use a desktop version over the server one? Again, I don't have much experience with scripting and coding in linux command line.

Another one, have any of you have experience running both AD and zimbra in parallel on a production or maybe in a test environment?

Because I am wondering, do you think a user can authenticate in AD, then be able to send email using zimbra account/mailbox? :)

I mean, can a user account be created on AD, and then be able to configure the AD to talk to zimbra then create the correponding email account/mailbox in zimbra?

Is Active Directory and Zimbra interoperable with each other?

Thanks again for the help brothers, really appreciate it!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not such a great deal, Ultimate, which gives you full 5080 features is $181.99 CAD per month, that's $2183.88 per year, I can buy the 5080 for $1809.99 CAD, then it goes up to $279.99 per month after the first billing cycle. Typical cloud rental, costs more than buying the hardware.
    • Wow, spoken like a true blind hater, you don't even provide arguments. Please, go check my comment above to @seacaptain and you'll find out why what you say doesn't make sense in this context...
    • Get used to this, with AI tooling now uncovering new vulns and getting them exploitable far faster than has ever been possible before software is going to need to be updated far more frequently. Back in the day it may take reseachers weeks or months to do what AI can now do in hours. Once its a threat is discovered it's weaponsized far more quickly, meaning you simply can't be waiting 2, 3, 4 weeks to deploy a patch, it needs to be patched immediately. Going to be interesting handling this in the enterprise space where traditionally patching has been steady, but very staged (and rightly so up until now), that is going to have to change.
    • You don't need to "close all browser sessions constantly" or wait for updates to install. The updates download in the background while you use the browser, without interrupting you, they install automatically the next time you launch the app. And they install very fast (depending on your storage speeds, of course), you have to wait at most 2-3 extra seconds, if any. Seems like you haven't used Edge in a loooooooong time...
    • Segra 1.6.0 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.0 changelog: Recording: Added HDR support. Grand Theft Auto: Added game integration for deaths (FiveM and RAGE MP supported). Highlights: Added customizable padding for highlights. Replay Buffer: Added a shockwave visual effect when a replay buffer clip is saved. Audio: Increased the maximum sound effects volume from 100% to 200%. Hotkeys: Fixed hotkeys not triggering while unrelated keys were held. Installer: Added code signing to verify publisher identity, branded the installer, and reduced OS security warnings. OBS: Updated the supported OBS version to 32.1.2. Download: Segra 1.6.0 | 74.4 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      175
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      163
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!