Recommended Posts

hi,

I am not really a linux guy, but my boss asked me to setup a new open source linux mail server.

I did some research about sendmail, postfix, squirrelmail, exim and qmail. I'm wondering if anyone has personal experience on setting this up?

Maybe someone can help me guide on this, maybe shed some light what can be the best mail server to use, and the one that would be easiest to maintain (less scripting and coding)..

The mail server will be serving atleast 70 users.

Thanks in advanced guys!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1088219-help-on-setting-up-a-mail-server/
Share on other sites

Save yourself time and effort, get; http://www.zimbra.co...pen-source.html

Especially since you're completely fresh and don't know what you're doing.

You'll need RHEL, SLES, Ubuntu LTS, Debian or Fedora to install it - it has extensive documentation and help available.

Save yourself time and effort, get; http://www.zimbra.co...pen-source.html

Especially since you're completely fresh and don't know what you're doing.

You'll need RHEL, SLES, Ubuntu LTS, Debian or Fedora to install it - it has extensive documentation and help available.

Thanks for the link brother.

I actually have some experience with ubuntu desktop, only as a user though. No scripting and server administration.. :)

I think I would try to use ubuntu or fedora first.

Will it work in desktop version?

I actually work here as a network engr, but our system admin guy has resigned only last week and still no replacement so my hod ask me to take care some of his pending works

and that includes the mail server installation on our remote site.

The linux mail server would need to connect to our exchange 2003 mail server and then finally be routed outside with our mail gateway (a trend micro virtual appliance).

I am doing the initial setup now, hopefully it would work as expected.

What do you think?

Oh wait - so you actually are setting up a relay and not a complete mail system?

The setup would be like this:

The remote site with ~70users will be using open source mail server. The HQ is using exchange 2003 as mail server and AD as the user directory. The remote site have a separate subdomain name and every email transactions outside in public would need to transit on the headquarters. It would be like in microsoft, we would configure a routing group to connect this two sites. An ipsec tunnel is configured to connect this two sites.

So with the linux mail server, I am not sure how to do this.

Lets say a user from the remote site, user A, sends an email on a public domain gmail.com. The email will be received by the linux mail server (zimbra in our case), and it would need to be routed or relayed to our exchange server in HQ then finally to the smtp gateway (trend micro appliance)..

Let me know brother if you need more info, as I really need help for this one..

Why not just setup the subdomain on the windows 2003 server that is hosting exchange as well, and do it all from there. You run into alot of issues when trying the relay stuff over a VPN. (or ipsec tunnel) Maybe give them dedicated ports on the server machine through the firewall. Would save a crapload of headache

Why not just setup the subdomain on the windows 2003 server that is hosting exchange as well, and do it all from there. You run into alot of issues when trying the relay stuff over a VPN. (or ipsec tunnel) Maybe give them dedicated ports on the server machine through the firewall. Would save a crapload of headache

x2

Why not just setup the subdomain on the windows 2003 server that is hosting exchange as well, and do it all from there. You run into alot of issues when trying the relay stuff over a VPN. (or ipsec tunnel) Maybe give them dedicated ports on the server machine through the firewall. Would save a crapload of headache

I am really sorry bother, but I made an error on my previous post. Just did a phone call to my hod, and he said the remote site is a whole different domain..

And one of my colleague actually made some effort earlier on the meeting to just migrate all the users to our main exchange server to ease the process.

About the ipsec tunnel. Some of our smaller sites, which are mostly retail stores and small offices (same domain) are connected via ipsec and email traffic have no problems at all. Servers are all windows based (AD,dns and exchnage).

But then again brother, you might be right on this one, as I can not confirm this if it would also work on a linux mail server as it would my first time to deploy it, much less to configure it to relay (like a smart host) an email to a windows exchnge server.

I am doing some more research on zimbra, and some users says it supports AD and exchange integration.

But maybe there's some other options, for me to have a backup plan once zimbra fails to work on my side.

Makes no difference, use exchange...setup exchange anywhere (rpc over http(s)) and the users will still use outlook, connect to the mail server, and have everyone synced as if they were sitting there at the main site (as far as mail is concerned).

Actually, the very reason the upper management was opted to consider an open source is a strict budget.

I told them that this deployment might affect our current system and would generate issues instead of just setting up a new exchange server on the remote site.

And they told me its not possible with the current budget. The workstations will be planning to use ubuntu desktop, and most of those users are hotel crews and attendants which are only familiar on windows platform.

Makes no difference, use exchange...setup exchange anywhere (rpc over http(s)) and the users will still use outlook, connect to the mail server, and have everyone synced as if they were sitting there at the main site (as far as mail is concerned).

Yeah, at first I think using OWA would suffice. But the thing brother is, I just confirmed now, its a different domain and really not related on the company. It looks like the management made "some aggrement" with the other site, then agrees to offer services and that includes setting up a new mail server and maybe a small virtual infrastructure in a few coming months. I really don't know what is in the contract, but the initial phase of the project that was given to my team is to setup a mail server (front-end and back-end) using open source solutions..

Thanks for the reply. :)

Yes, I am planning to use ubuntu as I've seen on the zimbra website, they actually have a package built right in for ubuntu 10.04.

Anyways, sorry for a noob question, but in my case, 70 users/mailbox and hub and spoke topology, do you think there will be a "big difference" both in performance and stability if I use a desktop version over the server one? Again, I don't have much experience with scripting and coding in linux command line.

Another one, have any of you have experience running both AD and zimbra in parallel on a production or maybe in a test environment?

Because I am wondering, do you think a user can authenticate in AD, then be able to send email using zimbra account/mailbox? :)

I mean, can a user account be created on AD, and then be able to configure the AD to talk to zimbra then create the correponding email account/mailbox in zimbra?

Is Active Directory and Zimbra interoperable with each other?

Thanks again for the help brothers, really appreciate it!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!