An Email Service That Deleted Emails When YOU Delete Them?


Recommended Posts

Is there an email service that deletes emails from the "deleted items" ONLY when you manually do it?

Gmail's 30 day is awful, I don't even know what Hotmail's is.

Although I could "archive" things on Gmail, I mainly use Windows Live Mail as a front end so having such an archive wouldn't work that great when I am used to clicking the delete button.

Thanks

"As I say to my users, Deleted items is not a place to store emails"

"Why not just stop throwing things in the bin if you're going to need them later?"

QFT!

All web based email services have a certain number of days they allow you to keep emails in your deleted items folder. I think Hotmail might be 15 days. It is assumed that Deleted Items are unwanted and will be purged. As others have said, either make a folder with saved or archived items, or use a mail client and download your mail with a client, but don't forget to back your stuff up.

If you have an email provider you can set the "keep" times for each individual folder, then use that.

I don't know about Windows Live Mail and Gmail, but let me tell you how I would do it with my setup (GMX (gmx.com) & Apple Mail)

a) create a new folder called "Sticky Trash" for example :laugh:

b) set the "keep" duration to unlimited

c) Go to Mail and remap the trash folder to the selected folder "Sticky Trash" via the menubar (Folder > Use selected folder for > Trash).

From now on, deleting mails in Apple Mail would move them to that folder we created.

If you want to empty it manually only, make sure your mail client doesn't auto-delete!

I don't know whether this will work for you, but that'd be the kind of way to do it I guess.

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 1

As others have stated above: 'Deleted items' is for emails I want to delete. The 30 day grace period Gmail gives you is more than enough to figure out whether or not I've accidentally deleted something.

If I want to keep an item I leave it in the inbox, making use of Gmail's labels and starring system to categorise them.

Asking for an email service with unlimited grace period for items in the trash folder is akin to using the Windows Recycle Bin as legitimate file storage option if you ask me.

"As I say to my users, Deleted items is not a place to store emails"

"Why not just stop throwing things in the bin if you're going to need them later?"

QFT!

Again, QFT!!

Do you put things in your trash at home to store important things? The same applies here, but googles garbage man only comes around once a month instead of once or twice a week...be happy it is that long.

Since you're using Gmail, why not just use the "Archive" button instead? Hides the emails from you, but still allows them to be found by searching (or by looking in the "all mail" tag). I don't delete anything except newsletters from my gmail. Everything just gets archived.

  • Like 1

"As I say to my users, Deleted items is not a place to store emails"

"Why not just stop throwing things in the bin if you're going to need them later?"

QFT!

Again, QFT!!

Do you put things in your trash at home to store important things? The same applies here, but googles garbage man only comes around once a month instead of once or twice a week...be happy it is that long.

QFT!

Hostmonster = win.

They have unlimited data hosting, unlimited e-mail box sizes, support full IMAP, all for the same price and have the additional spam filtering power of Google for $1 per month (cheaper than Business gmail).

I use email the same as I use the Recycle Bin.

With email, delete things I want to delete. However a few weeks later I may need to check back on something which I thought (and 99% of the time) has no value. As stated above, it just seems to be a habit I need to break. I'm sure Hotmail used to be longer than 15 days?

However, well done to those people who repeated the same question as "why delete something you don't want?". Answer: Because at the time I am not aware I needed it. That's like having a PC without a recycle bin. . . I could see major uproar if Microsoft decided to remove that feature. Therefore despite seemingly being a silly question, it has more depth than the two planks.

  • Like 1

Guys wait. So you mean, that if I really need something...like, my tax documents, I shouldn't put them in the recycling bin on Mondays? Can't I just call the recycling center and ask them to return them? is that not what a trash bin is for? saving things? hmmm...

Well I guess this is one user who lives up to his name... what a spoon!

On the positive side, it's users like him who keep the IT Support industry in business. We frequently have to carry out restores at work due to users who use Deleted Items in Outlook to store all read emails. :argh:

Phil

Guys, if you're not willing to help, just don't derive the thread.

Either you contribute or you don't.

Repeating the same old song over and over again doesn't help and as Mr Spoon pointed out, clearly this is not for stuff that is important, but for things that could be convenient to be checked on later on again.

Many things fly into some people's inboxes that they are not sure of whether it's usual "crap" or potentially of some use within the next couple of weeks or so.

Think about your usual newsletters that you might have subscribed to willingly.

You could say that some of them might have a coupon and when you check on prices and find your webshop you subscribed to has a good offer, you might wanna check whether you have a coupon, too.

Such mails I usually don't HAVE to keep around, so they rest quite well in the trash.

Losing them wouldn't harm, having them isn't so crucial to clog up all your nicely arranged, sorted and stored away mail and you definitely want to never see them again after they hit their date when there's no more use for them whatsoever.

A usage scenario might seem off and insane to you, but often the weirdest requests have some actual need behind them, so instead of telling a thousand times why USUALLY a request would result in bad computing behavior/risks/etc, here are three things I think that seem a little more helpful:

  1. Say what the risks are - fair enough if you're one of the first few to say this, at latest when the OP acknowledges the risks/problems involved in his or her request there's no more point in repeating the broken record sans doing one of these things:
  2. Help, try to tackle the requested issue and provide/guess a solution
  3. Tell where to find a solution

I swear I know this problem of people apparently not even trying to find out how I could possibly want some way of solving something.

It annoys me to no end to read the same response by tons of people whilst the actual problem stays untackled - AFTER acknowledging what the risks are.

Hope my reply from earlier might give you some direction, Mr Spoon.

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 1

Guys, if you're not willing to help, just don't derive the thread.

Either you contribute or you don't.

Repeating the same old song over and over again doesn't help and as Mr Spoon pointed out, clearly this is not for stuff that is important, but for things that could be convenient to be checked on later on again.

Many things fly into some people's inboxes that they are not sure of whether it's usual "crap" or potentially of some use within the next couple of weeks or so.

Think about your usual newsletters that you might have subscribed to willingly.

You could say that some of them might have a coupon and when you check on prices and find your webshop you subscribed to has a good offer, you might wanna check whether you have a coupon, too.

Such mails I usually don't HAVE to keep around, so they rest quite well in the trash.

Losing them wouldn't harm, having them isn't so crucial to clog up all your nicely arranged, sorted and stored away mail and you definitely want to never see them again after they hit their date when there's no more use for them whatsoever.

A usage scenario might seem off and insane to you, but often the weirdest requests have some actual need behind them, so instead of telling a thousand times why USUALLY a request would result in bad computing behavior/risks/etc, here are three things I think that seem a little more helpful:

  1. Say what the risks are - fair enough if you're one of the first few to say this, at latest when the OP acknowledges the risks/problems involved in his or her request there's no more point in repeating the broken record sans doing one of these things:
  2. Help, try to tackle the requested issue and provide/guess a solution
  3. Tell where to find a solution

I swear I know this problem of people apparently not even trying to find out how I could possibly want some way of solving something.

It annoys me to no end to read the same response by tons of people whilst the actual problem stays untackled - AFTER acknowledging what the risks are.

Hope my reply from earlier might give you some direction, Mr Spoon.

Glassed Silver:mac

The issue comes up likely due to someone that migrated from POP3 to IMAP4 (usually with a change in mail client software).

I'm a long-time (in fact, charter) US GMail user - however, my preferred e-mail client (Outlook) initially required special handling to deal with GMail (through Outlook 2007, in fact). However, this changed with Outlook 2010 (both x32 and x64, which is the flavor I use) - Outlook 2010 x64 not only supports IMAP4 on a co-equal basis with both POP3 and Exchange, it even supports IMAP4 auto-negotiation for GMail. Because GMail includes an Archived Items folder by default, anything I'm not sure of goes there first before final deletion; contrariwise, items I'm sure I want gone can be, in fact, deleted in place (just as if I were using local file-deletion or the browser-based interface for GMail). This is, as far as I know, unique to Outlook among IMAP4 clients - and why it has been my IMAP4/GMail client of choice (until WinRT Live Mail came along with Windows 8).

So create a folder called "could be useful" and drag it into there, The deleted items folder or recycle bin is somewhere you should store something you may want.

Not everyone wants to clog up their folder structure with folders they might only need once or twice a month :p

As I said, my main gripe was with the people's attitude towards Mr Spoon's problem, not the few hints to actually tackle this in some way. :)

Your reply is a valid option maybe, so good on you posting it for sure! (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving for OpenAI by Pradeep Viswanathan Noam Shazeer is best known as one of the co-authors of the 2017 “Attention Is All You Need” paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that now powers most large language models. He also worked on several major Google AI projects, including LaMDA, before leaving the company in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. He also authored the Sparsely-gated Mixture of Experts (2016) paper, which is popular among the AI community. After falling behind OpenAI and Anthropic a couple of years ago, Google brought Shazeer back in 2024 as part of a major deal with Character.AI. Through this deal, along with Noam, several other researchers returned to Google DeepMind. More recently, he was a vice president of engineering at Google and a technical co-lead for Gemini. Today, Noam Shazeer announced on X that he is leaving Google and joining OpenAI. In his post, Shazeer said it was a difficult decision to move on, adding that he was proud of the Google team and what it had built together. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman welcomed the move with a post of his own, saying Shazeer was one of the people he had most wanted to work with since OpenAI’s early days. Google has made strong progress with Gemini over the past year, closing the gap with OpenAI in several areas. But losing Noam Shazeer is a major talent setback for them, especially after bringing him back less than two years ago by spending a fortune. For OpenAI, the hire adds one of the industry’s most experienced language model researchers to a team that is already pushing ahead with ChatGPT, Codex, and its next generation of frontier models.
    • I'm lost too... what did you mean by your first comment then?
    • Couple years ago I got a brand new 4TB Samsung 990 Pro for $250 during Black Friday
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!