How much do you inflate your tires...tire spec or vehicle spec?


Recommended Posts

This is a dumb question, but my mom brought it up and I didn't have a good answer for her. How much air do you guys put in your tires? Do you inflate to what the tire says (or close to it), or do you go off the vehicle sticker on the inside of your door?

I have never done anything but what the tires state, and in most cases my vehicle sticker matches the tires anyway (except if i put larger tires on). But my mom has a Suburu outback, and while her tires say something like 50 psi, the vehicle sticker on the door says to put in something like 25-30psi...almost half! I look at her tires and they look highly under-inflated (bulging out on the bottom), but she seems to think that she should be going off what the door says and not the tires.

So what would you guys recommend? Door....or tire?

But my mom has a Suburu outback, and while her tires say something like 50 psi, the vehicle sticker on the door says to put in something like 25-30psi...almost half!

Door... I can't think of any tires besides temporary spares that would be at 50 psi, unless that's possibly the max inflation. :s

Tire. Highest psi possible. Best mileage possible. Right?

You realize you're talking minute fractions of an MPG, right? You'll be lucky if you save $20 a year.

The decreased rolling-resistance of an over-inflated tire is not nearly worth the decrease in handling, comfort and stopping power, and increase in road noise and risk of blowout.

Tire. Highest psi possible. Best mileage possible. Right?

Thats what my thinking is. Plus, what if you put larger tires on? I went from 17" run flats on my 335i to 19" lower profile tires. The door says around 50psi, my tires say 51 psi. But what if it was different and the new tires had a max rating of more? then you would be under inflating. I've always been told you don't want to bubble your tires out because it leads to decreased gas milage, as well as earlier failure of the tire, and have always gone with within 5% of the max PSI on the tire.

@mulligan, I could maybe understand that, but when I buy tires I buy for a vehicle, and rim size...so it would stand to reason that those tires were made for that vehicle/rim size, and therefore would know the max weight of the vehicle?

Thats what my thinking is. Plus, what if you put larger tires on? I went from 17" run flats on my 335i to 19" lower profile tires. The door says around 50psi, my tires say 51 psi. But what if it was different and the new tires had a max rating of more? then you would be under inflating. I've always been told you don't want to bubble your tires out because it leads to decreased gas milage, as well as earlier failure of the tire, and have always gone with within 5% of the max PSI on the tire.

@mulligan, I could maybe understand that, but when I buy tires I buy for a vehicle, and rim size...so it would stand to reason that those tires were made for that vehicle/rim size, and therefore would know the max weight of the vehicle?

I think you're reading the spec wrong. 50psi is absurdly high. It should be somewhere in the 30-40psi range.

The 335i is a relatively light vehicle. You do NOT need 50psi of pressure in your tires.

The max PSI number is only there so you don't blow the damn thing up in your face, you're not supposed to inflate it that high. Over inflating a) makes the ride worse b) increases braking distance and c) decreases cornering grip.

Not to mention the one "upside" you're claiming, better gas mileage, is non-existent, rolling resistance from the tires is an incredibly small factor in gas mileage, and probably not at all affected by tire pressure.

I think you're reading the spec wrong. 50psi is absurdly high. It should be somewhere in the 30-40psi range.

The 335i is a relatively light vehicle. You do NOT need 50psi of pressure in your tires.

You're correct, i just went and looked, i was reading the tires. 19"x 8.5" tires show 51 Max PSI, door sticker says 36/38PSI, although thats for runflat 17's. I found a post on e90forums that lead me to this:

(Vehicle Weight in lb/100) + 2 psi at heavier end + 2 psi all around if suspension and alignment are stock.

Example: Stock 911, 3,000 lb.

(3000/100) = 30 psi

Add 2 psi all around = 32 psi

Add 2 psi to heavy end = 34 psi at rear

With modified suspension, the result is 30 psi front, 32 psi rear.

so it looks like I've been over inflating. I duno about the door, since it's rated for 17's but I'll try this math out and let some air out, I've been inflating to around 45 PSI on 51 PSI max tires.

Thanks guys!

so it looks like I've been over inflating. I duno about the door, since it's rated for 17's but I'll try this math out and let some air out, I've been inflating to around 45 PSI on 51 PSI max tires.

Thanks guys!

Must have been a rough ride? :|

You're correct, i just went and looked, i was reading the tires. 19"x 8.5" tires show 51 Max PSI, door sticker says 36/38PSI, although thats for runflat 17's. I found a post on e90forums that lead me to this:

so it looks like I've been over inflating. I duno about the door, since it's rated for 17's but I'll try this math out and let some air out, I've been inflating to around 45 PSI on 51 PSI max tires.

Thanks guys!

That's more like it!

As Xenosion said, tire pressure is universal. The spec is relative to the weight of your vehicle, not to the size of your tires. 30psi in a 19" wheel is the same as 30psi in a 17" wheel. It will take less air to attain 30psi in a low-profile tire, but it is still 30psi and will support your vehicle just the same.

The only reason to go off-spec is if you're trying to tune the handling of your vehicle.

When you drop the PSI in your tires to spec, I guarantee you'll feel a noticieable increase in handling and comfort, and decrease in road noise. Also, depending on how long you've been driving with your tires at 45psi, you may want to inspect them and check to see if they're worn more in the middle than on the edges.

Edit: I'm not sure about RFTs. That might be an exception for running higher PSI.

Jesus, I'm really hoping American tyres are labelled differently to UK tyres. In the UK, the PSI on the tyre is the maximum the tyre is rated for. If you fill your tyre to this you're asking for trouble! You'll have greatly reduced grip and higher risk of blow-out. You should always fill the tyre to the car manufacturers stated guidelines +/- a couple of PSI for personal preference.

  • 3 months later...

Take 10% off the MAX tire pressure and this would be the tire pressure you need to fill your tires with. The pressure is based on the tire manufacture, not the vehicle recommended pressure. Each manufacture rates there tire pressure for their tire. Most of the time the vehicle and the tire will be close, but if there is a significant difference go by the tire. I have always gone by the tire manufacture.

  • Like 2

In the door jamb of american cars there is the recommended air pressure to have in the tires. I inflate to that, many places are now filling the tires with nitrogen to hold the air pressure constant, if filled with nitrogen you are better off going back to the place that filled your tires for a refill if needed. Do not fill to the maximum you will have issues with over inflation causing your tires to not have proper tread grip on the road and a strip wear pattern on your tires.

Jesus, I'm really hoping American tyres are labelled differently to UK tyres. In the UK, the PSI on the tyre is the maximum the tyre is rated for. If you fill your tyre to this you're asking for trouble! You'll have greatly reduced grip and higher risk of blow-out. You should always fill the tyre to the car manufacturers stated guidelines +/- a couple of PSI for personal preference.

Nope, that's how they are labeled here, people just don't seem to understand what MAXIMUM tire pressure means. Not recommended, but maximum. Always use what it says on the door unless you specifically know otherwise (special circumstances).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!