How much do you inflate your tires...tire spec or vehicle spec?


Recommended Posts

This is a dumb question, but my mom brought it up and I didn't have a good answer for her. How much air do you guys put in your tires? Do you inflate to what the tire says (or close to it), or do you go off the vehicle sticker on the inside of your door?

I have never done anything but what the tires state, and in most cases my vehicle sticker matches the tires anyway (except if i put larger tires on). But my mom has a Suburu outback, and while her tires say something like 50 psi, the vehicle sticker on the door says to put in something like 25-30psi...almost half! I look at her tires and they look highly under-inflated (bulging out on the bottom), but she seems to think that she should be going off what the door says and not the tires.

So what would you guys recommend? Door....or tire?

But my mom has a Suburu outback, and while her tires say something like 50 psi, the vehicle sticker on the door says to put in something like 25-30psi...almost half!

Door... I can't think of any tires besides temporary spares that would be at 50 psi, unless that's possibly the max inflation. :s

Tire. Highest psi possible. Best mileage possible. Right?

You realize you're talking minute fractions of an MPG, right? You'll be lucky if you save $20 a year.

The decreased rolling-resistance of an over-inflated tire is not nearly worth the decrease in handling, comfort and stopping power, and increase in road noise and risk of blowout.

Tire. Highest psi possible. Best mileage possible. Right?

Thats what my thinking is. Plus, what if you put larger tires on? I went from 17" run flats on my 335i to 19" lower profile tires. The door says around 50psi, my tires say 51 psi. But what if it was different and the new tires had a max rating of more? then you would be under inflating. I've always been told you don't want to bubble your tires out because it leads to decreased gas milage, as well as earlier failure of the tire, and have always gone with within 5% of the max PSI on the tire.

@mulligan, I could maybe understand that, but when I buy tires I buy for a vehicle, and rim size...so it would stand to reason that those tires were made for that vehicle/rim size, and therefore would know the max weight of the vehicle?

Thats what my thinking is. Plus, what if you put larger tires on? I went from 17" run flats on my 335i to 19" lower profile tires. The door says around 50psi, my tires say 51 psi. But what if it was different and the new tires had a max rating of more? then you would be under inflating. I've always been told you don't want to bubble your tires out because it leads to decreased gas milage, as well as earlier failure of the tire, and have always gone with within 5% of the max PSI on the tire.

@mulligan, I could maybe understand that, but when I buy tires I buy for a vehicle, and rim size...so it would stand to reason that those tires were made for that vehicle/rim size, and therefore would know the max weight of the vehicle?

I think you're reading the spec wrong. 50psi is absurdly high. It should be somewhere in the 30-40psi range.

The 335i is a relatively light vehicle. You do NOT need 50psi of pressure in your tires.

The max PSI number is only there so you don't blow the damn thing up in your face, you're not supposed to inflate it that high. Over inflating a) makes the ride worse b) increases braking distance and c) decreases cornering grip.

Not to mention the one "upside" you're claiming, better gas mileage, is non-existent, rolling resistance from the tires is an incredibly small factor in gas mileage, and probably not at all affected by tire pressure.

I think you're reading the spec wrong. 50psi is absurdly high. It should be somewhere in the 30-40psi range.

The 335i is a relatively light vehicle. You do NOT need 50psi of pressure in your tires.

You're correct, i just went and looked, i was reading the tires. 19"x 8.5" tires show 51 Max PSI, door sticker says 36/38PSI, although thats for runflat 17's. I found a post on e90forums that lead me to this:

(Vehicle Weight in lb/100) + 2 psi at heavier end + 2 psi all around if suspension and alignment are stock.

Example: Stock 911, 3,000 lb.

(3000/100) = 30 psi

Add 2 psi all around = 32 psi

Add 2 psi to heavy end = 34 psi at rear

With modified suspension, the result is 30 psi front, 32 psi rear.

so it looks like I've been over inflating. I duno about the door, since it's rated for 17's but I'll try this math out and let some air out, I've been inflating to around 45 PSI on 51 PSI max tires.

Thanks guys!

so it looks like I've been over inflating. I duno about the door, since it's rated for 17's but I'll try this math out and let some air out, I've been inflating to around 45 PSI on 51 PSI max tires.

Thanks guys!

Must have been a rough ride? :|

You're correct, i just went and looked, i was reading the tires. 19"x 8.5" tires show 51 Max PSI, door sticker says 36/38PSI, although thats for runflat 17's. I found a post on e90forums that lead me to this:

so it looks like I've been over inflating. I duno about the door, since it's rated for 17's but I'll try this math out and let some air out, I've been inflating to around 45 PSI on 51 PSI max tires.

Thanks guys!

That's more like it!

As Xenosion said, tire pressure is universal. The spec is relative to the weight of your vehicle, not to the size of your tires. 30psi in a 19" wheel is the same as 30psi in a 17" wheel. It will take less air to attain 30psi in a low-profile tire, but it is still 30psi and will support your vehicle just the same.

The only reason to go off-spec is if you're trying to tune the handling of your vehicle.

When you drop the PSI in your tires to spec, I guarantee you'll feel a noticieable increase in handling and comfort, and decrease in road noise. Also, depending on how long you've been driving with your tires at 45psi, you may want to inspect them and check to see if they're worn more in the middle than on the edges.

Edit: I'm not sure about RFTs. That might be an exception for running higher PSI.

Jesus, I'm really hoping American tyres are labelled differently to UK tyres. In the UK, the PSI on the tyre is the maximum the tyre is rated for. If you fill your tyre to this you're asking for trouble! You'll have greatly reduced grip and higher risk of blow-out. You should always fill the tyre to the car manufacturers stated guidelines +/- a couple of PSI for personal preference.

  • 3 months later...

Take 10% off the MAX tire pressure and this would be the tire pressure you need to fill your tires with. The pressure is based on the tire manufacture, not the vehicle recommended pressure. Each manufacture rates there tire pressure for their tire. Most of the time the vehicle and the tire will be close, but if there is a significant difference go by the tire. I have always gone by the tire manufacture.

  • Like 2

In the door jamb of american cars there is the recommended air pressure to have in the tires. I inflate to that, many places are now filling the tires with nitrogen to hold the air pressure constant, if filled with nitrogen you are better off going back to the place that filled your tires for a refill if needed. Do not fill to the maximum you will have issues with over inflation causing your tires to not have proper tread grip on the road and a strip wear pattern on your tires.

Jesus, I'm really hoping American tyres are labelled differently to UK tyres. In the UK, the PSI on the tyre is the maximum the tyre is rated for. If you fill your tyre to this you're asking for trouble! You'll have greatly reduced grip and higher risk of blow-out. You should always fill the tyre to the car manufacturers stated guidelines +/- a couple of PSI for personal preference.

Nope, that's how they are labeled here, people just don't seem to understand what MAXIMUM tire pressure means. Not recommended, but maximum. Always use what it says on the door unless you specifically know otherwise (special circumstances).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!