How much do you inflate your tires...tire spec or vehicle spec?


Recommended Posts

I use vehicle spec. The point is to have a flat contact patch for optimum grip. This reflects in the tyre wear - my tyres wear evenly.

The vehicle engineers are smarter than you, their recommendations are 100% solid.

That'll explain the the melting tyres on explorers and mavericks that lead to a couple of fatalities, as vehicle spec inflation was lower than tyre manufacturer recommendation in those cases, and was pointed out by the user above you.

I remember the story on the news, there was even a watchdod episode about ford's attempt to shift the blame, and attemting to cover it up etc...

Though my first instinct was to go with the vehicle's PSI recommendation, I think that going by the tires' stated PSI is just as good, if not better. Here's why:

 

1 - Though this is just a theory, it seems vehicle manufacturers would recommend a lower PSI rating so that traction is increased and safety specs improved (such as those advertised in commercials like shortest stopping distance, best handing, etc...). Though perhaps better to show off specs and in bad weather, it's probably wise to go higher for everyday, average-use purposes.

2 - Auto manufacturers might assume that a tire is inflated before being mounted. Thousands of pounds of car is sure to increase the pressure, so maybe the auto's recommended pressure is just in case the average consumer doesn't;t take that into consideration and max-fills the tire before mounting.

3 - Are the tires factory-originals? Even if the tire size and ratings are the same the recommended PSI can vary greatly from brand to brand and make to make. In this case the auto's PSI recommendations are likely irrelevant, unless you get the exact matching tire models.

4 - My car "disapproved" of its own door-mounted PSI.  :o  The TPMS light kept coming on in my 2006 Mazda Tribute (a.k.a. Ford Escape, Mercury Mariner). I had all tires inflated to and slightly above the recommendation of 30 PSI, but still the light was on and I could tell there was a lot of excess drag when turning. So I switched to the tires' specs of 44 PSI, and now the TPMS is off, no more high-drag feeling from the tires, and at least 2 MPG gained!!! No bulging or excess wear points to be seen. (similar scenario with my Chevy Tracker too)

 

So based purely on what I've experienced, go with the tires' ratings. As long as the PSI is taken with the load of the vehicle already being applied there should be no problem. :)

 

By the tire? Why? That makes very little sense. The people who designed the car should know far better than the guy who designed a tire for a whole host of cars... My tire has a max PSI of something like 60+ PSI, but the car recommends 32PSI. You're essentially asking for almost double what the manufacturer recommends which makes no sense.

 

My car's Continental Tires are OE equipment on a crap ton of cars...

 

Also, you can adjust the TPMS reference point... Someone set your TPMS to the wrong reference values. You should reset it to the correct pressures to ensure you're safety on the road.

 

Never follow the door, once the Tires have been replaced.  You should do 15% less then max.   

 

Following the door recommendation is why FORD and Firestone had issues, the tires max was 44, and the trucks door said 25-27, way to little to allow the tire to cool.  

 

This is not the only example, but the car door tag was for the original spec'ed tires (not necessarily the ones that ship with the car 

 

You're also suggesting ignoring the recommendation of the car manufacturer without anything other than one case where the OE failed to list correct pressures? Even though overfilled tires lead to uneven tread-wear at a minimum and a blowout at its worst.

 

No one in the industry recommends this...

 

Tire manufacturers don't recommend it:

 

 

Do not use the number on your tire

By the tire? Why? That makes very little sense. The people who designed the car should know far better than the guy who designed a tire for a whole host of cars... My tire has a max PSI of something like 60+ PSI, but the car recommends 32PSI. You're essentially asking for almost double what the manufacturer recommends which makes no sense.

 

My car's Continental Tires are OE equipment on a crap ton of cars...

 

Also, you can adjust the TPMS reference point... Someone set your TPMS to the wrong reference values. You should reset it to the correct pressures to ensure you're safety on the road.

 

 

You're also suggesting ignoring the recommendation of the car manufacturer without anything other than one case where the OE failed to list correct pressures? Even though overfilled tires lead to uneven tread-wear at a minimum and a blowout at its worst.

 

No one in the industry recommends this...

 

Tire manufacturers don't recommend it:

 

 

Source: Michelin Tires

 

Tire sellers don't:

 

 

Source: Tire Rack

 

OEMs don't:

 

 

Source: Toyota

 

The government safety regulators don't:

 

 

Source: National Highway Safety Administration

 

I'd think all of these engineers would have a pretty good handle on giving us a solid recommendation on where to look. Stop putting yourself and others at risk on the road.

 

 

 

See above...

I used to work at Goodyear Wolverhampton, and disagree.

Going back to the ford vs Firestone debacle, ford even admitted using lower tyre pressure, to lower the centre of gravity of their mavericks and explorers, they made a huge fuss about it also, first they blamed the deceased drivers for dangerous driving, then they blamed Firestone for poorly made tyres, if it wasn't for the fact that Nissan, Toyota, and Chevy were using the same tyre without ever having an incident, they might have gotten away with it.

The watchdog episode I'm thinking about (not sure if it was aired in the States) was a full on investigation, and found that ford was responsible for the 2 deaths because of their lower tyre pressure recommendation.

However the manufacturer specs takes into consideration load where the tire manufacturer tells you the maximum tire pressure the tire can safely hold without failure/blow out.  Over inflation can lead to tire wear.  perhaps over or under inflating to the point of noticing tire wear would do you some good so you know the limit of where the tire can accept at the particular load the vehicle has, you may ruin the tire doing this but I guess that would be better so that you know where too much or too little is for the tire.  5psi up or down isn't going to make too much of difference 20 psi is a different story.  when you get a center strip of lower tread that is too much pressure, when you have strips along each side of the tire that is too little. 

 

how to read your tires: http://www.procarcare.com/includes/content/resourcecenter/encyclopedia/ch25/25readtirewear.html

 

how over inflation affects tire wear: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/over-inflation-affect-tire-wear.htm

 

If you did work at a tire place you would know this.  As a automotive enthusiast and a graduate of an college automotive repair program (albeit before the ford issue...although I did own an explorer and did not have the issue that was reported with the same firestone tires that were in question), I have been taught this.

However the manufacturer specs takes into consideration load where the tire manufacturer tells you the maximum tire pressure the tire can safely hold without failure/blow out. Over inflation can lead to tire wear. perhaps over or under inflating to the point of noticing tire wear would do you some good so you know the limit of where the tire can accept at the particular load the vehicle has, you may ruin the tire doing this but I guess that would be better so that you know where too much or too little is for the tire. 5psi up or down isn't going to make too much of difference 20 psi is a different story. when you get a center strip of lower tread that is too much pressure, when you have strips along each side of the tire that is too little.

how to read your tires: http://www.procarcare.com/includes/content/resourcecenter/encyclopedia/ch25/25readtirewear.html

how over inflation affects tire wear: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/over-inflation-affect-tire-wear.htm

If you did work at a tire place you would know this. As a automotive enthusiast and a graduate of an college automotive repair program (albeit before the ford issue...although I did own an explorer and did not have the issue that was reported with the same firestone tires that were in question), I have been taught this.

Was this meant for me? If so, yes I am aware and do know, I haven't forgotten it all in my old age yet :p

To answer your points.

I am aware of how tyres behave under incorrect tyre pressures, and how weather can dramatically affect poorly inflated tyres. I'll admit I was purely focussed on the ford issue.

Now I work as a truck driver, and often see what happens when an underinflated tyre blows out on big rig trailers, not to mention the noise they make when they do blow out.

Vehicle manufacturer recommendations I rarely believe, unless they align with the recommendation of the tyre manufacturer..

I can offer an example (you'll have to excuse this part, as I did not take a picture for reference) Mercedes on their converted sprinter vans (converted to armoured cash carriers and ambulances) give a recommendation on each arch, for the preferred inflation of tyres, they usually recommend uniroyals when it comes to light commercial and heavy goods vehicles, on a few of these ambulances and armored cars, I've seen tyre pressure recommendations of up to 76 psi (if I remember to snap a pic, I'll happily post it) uniroyal agree with this, I'll always get a second opinion where possible until I'm suitably comfortable. That's just me, I've seen a family wiped out when their car was flattened by an out of control coach, which, after a blowout, rolled onto it, back in the 80's (such images never really leave a person, and change the way a person absorbs advice)

And now for the smartass in me, you forgot to mention how to tell if a vehicle is negotiating roundabouts regularly at excessive speed, the outer edge of the (front left or right, depending on which side of the road one happens to drive on) of the tyre :p

well hopefully if you are negotiating "roundabouts" at excessive speed, you aren't going to complain about uneven tread wear or premature wear :p

 

Those heavy vehicles probably have an F load tire with a 95 psi rating...not dealing with a passenger tire at 50-65 psi rating.  Is the vehicle manufacturer the final manufacturer or is the ambulance/armored car manufacturer the final manufacturer where you should listen to the pressure rating on the tires.

well hopefully if you are negotiating "roundabouts" at excessive speed, you aren't going to complain about uneven tread wear or premature wear :p.

Those heavy vehicles probably have an F load tire with a 95 psi rating...not dealing with a passenger tire at 50-65 psi rating. Is the vehicle manufacturer the final manufacturer or is the ambulance/armored car manufacturer the final manufacturer where you should listen to the pressure rating on the tires.

The refitter, they usually buy the vehicles in bulk, and refit/rebody, the cab exterior usually, mostly left alone in the instance of ambulances, barring the fitting of lights and strobes. (Armoured cars, of course, needing a lot more reworking of said cab) So I will say, the refitter is the final manufacturer.

<off topic>I apologise for my rant</off topic>

  • 2 years later...

Most of you are very wrong! You only go by the vehicle sticker if you have the EXACT tire on the vehicle that it rolls off the line with. The sticker in the door doesn't know what tire you or a previous owner has put on the vehicle. Use the sticker on the vehicle to buy the type of tires rated and recommended for that particular vehicle. Other than that, inflate to 5-7psi under the max pressure it says on the tire itself. I have a 2012 XB with lowpro toyos and the max press on the tire says 50psi so no, that is not insanely high. It all depends on the type, size, rating and brand of tire choice. It's not rocket science, always read from your actual tire spec. 

  • Jim K locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!