Windows stops booting when new RAM is installed


Recommended Posts

Currently have 1x 4 GB chip.

Trying to install a second 4 GB chip.

Without the new RAM, it boots fine but with the new RAM (in different slots), Windows reboots when it says "Starting Windows" (the animation doesn't even appear).

It also reboots before Startup Repair or Safe mode get properly started.

PC boots fine if I take out the RAM.

The RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

Any ideas?

EDIT: Tried taking out the older chip and only put the new one in. Same problems. Faulty RAM?

w/o further info, it's hard to diagnose. are the two sticks identical in specs? some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly? can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

I actually had the similar behavior, and the fix was to actually uncheck 'automatic' from the RAM timing and set manually to the rated specs of the RAM. Took me FOREVER to figure that one out...

Also, if you remove your original RAM and use only the new RAM does it still boot? It seems you've only confirmed that it still boots correctly if you remove the new RAM.

w/o further info, it's hard to diagnose. are the two sticks identical in specs? some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly? can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

As I said, the RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

Only using the new chip causes the same problems.

I don't really see a need to even guess. Just take it back to where you bought it say it wouldn't boot when it was in. They should replace it without argument.

I bought it originally from Ebuyer. It didn't work (random BSODs after a few hours) so I RMA'd it to Corsair. This new chip is the RMA replacement chip and now the PC won't even boot :/

I bought it originally from Ebuyer. It didn't work (random BSODs after a few hours) so I RMA'd it to Corsair. This new chip is the RMA replacement chip and now the PC won't even boot :/

Okie doke, continue looking through the bios for the memory timing options then. :rofl:

Although there is still the outside chance that you're just unlucky and got 2 bad sticks in a row.

As I said, the RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

Only using the new chip causes the same problems.

but you didnt answer my questions.

1. are the sticks identical in specs?

2. some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly?

3. can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

Okie doke, continue looking through the bios for the memory timing options then. :rofl:

<snip>

Within Advanced, I see:

  • CPU Configuration
  • Chipset
  • Onboard Devices Configuration
  • USB Configuration
  • PCIPnP
  • Intel VT-d Configuration

but you didnt answer my questions.

1. are the sticks identical in specs?

2. some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly?

3. can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

1. Yes. As I said, I know the RAM is fully compatible with the PC.

2. I've tried various slots.

3. Read my original post edit. The edit was made literally 10 seconds after I first made the topic.

Name both modules you are using.

And as said above - ensure RAM timing is set to auto.

If you don't know how to use it, then it should looks like this.

<image snipped>

As I've said, I see nothing like that in the BIOS. It's a very basic motherboard.

I see no way to adjust RAM timings and even if I could, I would never have touched them.

As others have asked, lets try this.

What is the make/model of the memory, what is the make/model of the system or motherboard?

Help us, help you...

It's a custom built PC. The motherboard information is in my signature, the Asus P7H55-M SI.

Both RAM chips are 4 GB DDR3-1333.

I've found out the hard way that mobo's are extremely sensitive on RAM. If you're using different brands, that could be causing problems. If you're using a brand and model not even listed by the moobo manufacturer that could be your cuplrit too. I built an i3 HTPC and had stability problems. A fellow Neowinian pointed out the list of compatible RAM with my mobo and I bought it and haven't had a single problem since. From now on when I build, I'm going to the mobo site and making sure I buy RAM listed as approved. That's the biggest lesson I've learned in years.

does this help you at all? i pulled this information about the BIOS from the motherboard's manual

post-34502-0-63999300-1343137523.jpg

The only BIOS screen I can find related to RAM is this one, and it's all set to Auto:

post-645-0-23761000-1343137709.jpg

I will try resetting the BIOS defaults in 30 minutes when I get home, although I can't see it helping unfortunately.

2. Set bios defaults

3. Memtest x86

I'm surprised this hadn't been suggested earlier. This is the first thing I do in case of a similar event.

Should memtest86+ return any errors, the customer service will replace the memory without blinking.

I've found out the hard way that mobo's are extremely sensitive on RAM. If you're using different brands, that could be causing problems. If you're using a brand and model not even listed by the moobo manufacturer that could be your cuplrit too.

Actually, I haven't found that to be the case at all. I have two pairs of memory installed, each with a different size, different brand, different speed rating and different timings - the RAM works perfectly in dual-channel and my system is 100% stable (Prime95; Intel Burnt Test). However, when I first installed the RAM my computer wouldn't boot because I had the timings set to manual. It corrected itself though as my motherboard has automatic memory configuration.

Have you got another computer you can test the memory in? If you reset the BIOS and use just the new chip it should theoretically work; if not it would seem it's either faulty or incompatible with your motherboard.

The RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

How did you determine this? Is the manufacturer specifically listed in the motherboard's manual and/or website or are you referring to the speed rating? Although all RAM should be compatible with all motherboards with the same memory rating the reality is that there are sometimes incompatibilities, which is why motherboard manufacturers usually list specifically compatible memory.

I recommend resetting the bios with the jumper and not using restore default settings within bios, it is not the same thing, It happened to me many times and the only way it worked was with hard reset.

I took the battery out for 30 seconds, which reset the BIOS. Same issues occured.

I'm surprised this hadn't been suggested earlier. This is the first thing I do in case of a similar event.

Should memtest86+ return any errors, the customer service will replace the memory without blinking.

This is... different somehow mate. I just don't feel that is the issue.

Actually, I haven't found that to be the case at all. I have two pairs of memory installed, each with a different size, different brand, different speed rating and different timings - the RAM works perfectly in dual-channel and my system is 100% stable (Prime95; Intel Burnt Test). However, when I first installed the RAM my computer wouldn't boot because I had the timings set to manual. It corrected itself though as my motherboard has automatic memory configuration.

Have you got another computer you can test the memory in? If you reset the BIOS and use just the new chip it should theoretically work; if not it would seem it's either faulty or incompatible with your motherboard.

Unfortunately, I have no other PC to try it in.

How did you determine this? Is the manufacturer specifically listed in the motherboard's manual and/or website or are you referring to the speed rating? Although all RAM should be compatible with all motherboards with the same memory rating the reality is that there are sometimes incompatibilities, which is why motherboard manufacturers usually list specifically compatible memory.

It's Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9.

The other chip (that works perfectly) is "PNY 4GB DIMM DDR3 PC3-10660 1333 MHz 240 PIN".

So they should both be compatible with the motherboard and with each other I presumed :s

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • While I agree with all that, it just proves there's an a** built for every seat.
    • Lol are you mad because I'm not using AI? I'd rather pay people than lose a bunch of potential customers and get humilated because I used AI. A lot of people won't purchase a game if it used AI during development.
    • LibreWolf 152.0-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. LibreWolf 152.0-1 changelog: Upstream release, see the Firefox 152.0 Release Notes Notable changes: The AppImages are now built on Codeberg along with the other releases We have decided to wait a bit longer to enable the settings redesign, due to use being aware of multiple upstream issues Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • hahahahah wow hahahah you sure got me there hahahahahah, you know that bad performance is always due to poor optimization by the developers, right???
    • "I know for a fact I'll never own one of these." This is why choice is better than government regulation. Globaly Android has something like 72% of the smartphone market. Granted the vast majority of that is low end phones. Apple can and should charge whatever they want. The market will decide if it is too much.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      560
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!