Windows stops booting when new RAM is installed


Recommended Posts

Currently have 1x 4 GB chip.

Trying to install a second 4 GB chip.

Without the new RAM, it boots fine but with the new RAM (in different slots), Windows reboots when it says "Starting Windows" (the animation doesn't even appear).

It also reboots before Startup Repair or Safe mode get properly started.

PC boots fine if I take out the RAM.

The RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

Any ideas?

EDIT: Tried taking out the older chip and only put the new one in. Same problems. Faulty RAM?

w/o further info, it's hard to diagnose. are the two sticks identical in specs? some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly? can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

I actually had the similar behavior, and the fix was to actually uncheck 'automatic' from the RAM timing and set manually to the rated specs of the RAM. Took me FOREVER to figure that one out...

Also, if you remove your original RAM and use only the new RAM does it still boot? It seems you've only confirmed that it still boots correctly if you remove the new RAM.

w/o further info, it's hard to diagnose. are the two sticks identical in specs? some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly? can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

As I said, the RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

Only using the new chip causes the same problems.

I don't really see a need to even guess. Just take it back to where you bought it say it wouldn't boot when it was in. They should replace it without argument.

I bought it originally from Ebuyer. It didn't work (random BSODs after a few hours) so I RMA'd it to Corsair. This new chip is the RMA replacement chip and now the PC won't even boot :/

I bought it originally from Ebuyer. It didn't work (random BSODs after a few hours) so I RMA'd it to Corsair. This new chip is the RMA replacement chip and now the PC won't even boot :/

Okie doke, continue looking through the bios for the memory timing options then. :rofl:

Although there is still the outside chance that you're just unlucky and got 2 bad sticks in a row.

As I said, the RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

Only using the new chip causes the same problems.

but you didnt answer my questions.

1. are the sticks identical in specs?

2. some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly?

3. can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

Okie doke, continue looking through the bios for the memory timing options then. :rofl:

<snip>

Within Advanced, I see:

  • CPU Configuration
  • Chipset
  • Onboard Devices Configuration
  • USB Configuration
  • PCIPnP
  • Intel VT-d Configuration

but you didnt answer my questions.

1. are the sticks identical in specs?

2. some motherboards require that the RAM be placed in certain slots. are they installed correctly?

3. can you run the single, new stick w/o the old stick installed?

1. Yes. As I said, I know the RAM is fully compatible with the PC.

2. I've tried various slots.

3. Read my original post edit. The edit was made literally 10 seconds after I first made the topic.

Name both modules you are using.

And as said above - ensure RAM timing is set to auto.

If you don't know how to use it, then it should looks like this.

<image snipped>

As I've said, I see nothing like that in the BIOS. It's a very basic motherboard.

I see no way to adjust RAM timings and even if I could, I would never have touched them.

As others have asked, lets try this.

What is the make/model of the memory, what is the make/model of the system or motherboard?

Help us, help you...

It's a custom built PC. The motherboard information is in my signature, the Asus P7H55-M SI.

Both RAM chips are 4 GB DDR3-1333.

I've found out the hard way that mobo's are extremely sensitive on RAM. If you're using different brands, that could be causing problems. If you're using a brand and model not even listed by the moobo manufacturer that could be your cuplrit too. I built an i3 HTPC and had stability problems. A fellow Neowinian pointed out the list of compatible RAM with my mobo and I bought it and haven't had a single problem since. From now on when I build, I'm going to the mobo site and making sure I buy RAM listed as approved. That's the biggest lesson I've learned in years.

does this help you at all? i pulled this information about the BIOS from the motherboard's manual

post-34502-0-63999300-1343137523.jpg

The only BIOS screen I can find related to RAM is this one, and it's all set to Auto:

post-645-0-23761000-1343137709.jpg

I will try resetting the BIOS defaults in 30 minutes when I get home, although I can't see it helping unfortunately.

2. Set bios defaults

3. Memtest x86

I'm surprised this hadn't been suggested earlier. This is the first thing I do in case of a similar event.

Should memtest86+ return any errors, the customer service will replace the memory without blinking.

I've found out the hard way that mobo's are extremely sensitive on RAM. If you're using different brands, that could be causing problems. If you're using a brand and model not even listed by the moobo manufacturer that could be your cuplrit too.

Actually, I haven't found that to be the case at all. I have two pairs of memory installed, each with a different size, different brand, different speed rating and different timings - the RAM works perfectly in dual-channel and my system is 100% stable (Prime95; Intel Burnt Test). However, when I first installed the RAM my computer wouldn't boot because I had the timings set to manual. It corrected itself though as my motherboard has automatic memory configuration.

Have you got another computer you can test the memory in? If you reset the BIOS and use just the new chip it should theoretically work; if not it would seem it's either faulty or incompatible with your motherboard.

The RAM is 100% compatible with the PC.

How did you determine this? Is the manufacturer specifically listed in the motherboard's manual and/or website or are you referring to the speed rating? Although all RAM should be compatible with all motherboards with the same memory rating the reality is that there are sometimes incompatibilities, which is why motherboard manufacturers usually list specifically compatible memory.

I recommend resetting the bios with the jumper and not using restore default settings within bios, it is not the same thing, It happened to me many times and the only way it worked was with hard reset.

I took the battery out for 30 seconds, which reset the BIOS. Same issues occured.

I'm surprised this hadn't been suggested earlier. This is the first thing I do in case of a similar event.

Should memtest86+ return any errors, the customer service will replace the memory without blinking.

This is... different somehow mate. I just don't feel that is the issue.

Actually, I haven't found that to be the case at all. I have two pairs of memory installed, each with a different size, different brand, different speed rating and different timings - the RAM works perfectly in dual-channel and my system is 100% stable (Prime95; Intel Burnt Test). However, when I first installed the RAM my computer wouldn't boot because I had the timings set to manual. It corrected itself though as my motherboard has automatic memory configuration.

Have you got another computer you can test the memory in? If you reset the BIOS and use just the new chip it should theoretically work; if not it would seem it's either faulty or incompatible with your motherboard.

Unfortunately, I have no other PC to try it in.

How did you determine this? Is the manufacturer specifically listed in the motherboard's manual and/or website or are you referring to the speed rating? Although all RAM should be compatible with all motherboards with the same memory rating the reality is that there are sometimes incompatibilities, which is why motherboard manufacturers usually list specifically compatible memory.

It's Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9.

The other chip (that works perfectly) is "PNY 4GB DIMM DDR3 PC3-10660 1333 MHz 240 PIN".

So they should both be compatible with the motherboard and with each other I presumed :s

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!