What do you call Elizabeth (the Queen) ?


Recommended Posts

An anachronism?

But an excellent parachutist.

Kudos to Gary Connery for his performance as the Queen's stunt double.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/olympics/4460237/London-2012-The-Queens-stunt-double-revealed-as-wingsuit-daredevil.html

Jobless scrounger :laugh:

To be honest she does have a job, she's pretty good at showing the world how incredibly British Britain is. Oh and although I'm not a huge fan of the Queen, I cannot turn my head to the studies showing that she brings tons more money to Britain because of tourism compared to the amount of tax money that she actually uses.

I'd like to know how she's a waste of public money?

^ She collects money from the taxpayers, I believe.

Queen of England's income frozen until 2015

Queen Elizabeth II faces a freeze on her income through at least 2015 thanks to funding cuts for the royal household resulting from a recently passed law. Her income has already dropped in real terms since 2009 as she has joined the millions of others affected by the economic downturn.

The funding for the royal family has traditionally come from the civil list, a public fund controlled by the British Parliament. However, a law passed six weeks ago will replace the civil list with a single fund, the sovereign grant, in April 2013.

The sovereign grant will be 15 percent of the surplus money generated by the Crown Estate. The Crown Estate is a ?diverse property business valued at more than 7 billion,?? according to its website. It owns properties that include Regent Street and Great Windsor Park as well as ?almost all of the seabed around the UK.?? The Queen?s income will depend on how well the Crown Estate portfolio performs in a given year.

http://today.msnbc.m...l/#.UBbp7KPNkYI

I call her a waste of public money, and a relic of a bygone era that needs to go away.

If you're British, this statement could be interpreted incorrectly as treason (a crime which still holds the death penalty in the UK).

Also, I think you'll find your statement is bent on a misconception; the Queen isn't a waste of public funds, her presence alone helps facilitate an awful lot of income for the country.

since the Olympic games opening "Ms. clinical". Absolute unemotional.

From the photos I've seen, she looked cranky rather than unemotional. I didn't like the games opening either, it was a silly and bizarre, even if well produced and well staged. So I can identify with the queen's reaction :)

If you're British, this statement could be interpreted incorrectly as treason (a crime which still holds the death penalty in the UK).

A fact which reinforces the idea that the monarchy and some laws related to it are outdated.

Also, I think you'll find your statement is bent on a misconception; the Queen isn't a waste of public funds, her presence alone helps facilitate an awful lot of income for the country.

I think you'll find your statement may be bent on a misconception :) The following video explains how abolishing the monarchy could lead to more income for the UK, through tourism:

[. . .] Oh and although I'm not a huge fan of the Queen, I cannot turn my head to the studies showing that she brings tons more money to Britain because of tourism compared to the amount of tax money that she actually uses.

The video I've embedded above explains how the UK could end up gaining more income, through tourism, if the monarchy was abolished. Perhaps the studies you've seen/read are incorrect? I don't know, but the video above sounds plausible.

I think you'll find your statement may be bent on misconception :) The following video explains how abolishing the monarchy could lead to more income for the UK, through tourism:

Which would all involve confiscating the property that is currently owned by the royal family. And it also doesn't even mention the fact they also invite huge tourism at events like coronations, weddings, etc. Btw, who pays for maintenance of the property?

Not that you shouldn't abolish the monarchy, I just find that the video is kind of skirting the real issues, not addressing the heart of the matter.

  • Like 2

Which would all involve confiscating the property that is currently owned by the royal family. And it also doesn't even mention the fact they also invite huge tourism at events like coronations, weddings, etc. Btw, who pays for maintenance of the property?

Not that you shouldn't abolish the monarchy, I just find that the video is kind of skirting the real issues, not addressing the heart of the matter.

Thanks for the points. I'll keep them in mind. It could well be that the video does that. I'm still not sure what to believe after seeing the video and after hearing about studies which have suggested otherwise.

I don't like the monarchy as an institution, but I'm not (yet) passionately for it being abolished. I'm always curious as to whether anyone can prove for sure that we will gain less income without it, though :)

I'm not sure who pays for the maintenance of the property. I'll have to find that out. It could well be us taxpayers, though.

Thanks for the points. I'll keep them in mind. It could well be that the video does that. I'm still not sure what to believe after seeing the video and after hearing about studies which have suggested otherwise.

I don't like the monarchy as an institution, but I'm not (yet) passionately for it being abolished. I'm always curious as to whether anyone can prove for sure that we will gain less income without it, though :)

I'm not sure who pays for the maintenance of the property. I'll have to find that out. It could well be us taxpayers, though.

They receive grants from the Gov. to pay for maintenance on various properties.

I don't like the monarchy as an institution, but I'm not (yet) passionately for it being abolished. I'm always curious as to whether anyone can prove for sure that we will gain less income without it, though :)

Well it just seems to me the real issue is not the money arguments -- since it shouldn't be decided on which way makes more profit -- but whether the property should be confiscated and made public, or the royal family kept as the conservators of the property, and as a part of Britains' historical institutions.

I'm an outsider so I can't argue that, of course. I have talked with some Swedish friends and they've basically given me the impression that in Sweden the monarchy isn't as controversial in Britain and they basically just see it as ceremonial and a somewhat of a celebration of Sweden's history.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
    • The only difference here is that you think you came up with these reasons. You didn't. These age old fearmongering lies (that were NEVER true) were funded by and the anger stoked by Putin through proxies like Farage (and later in the USA, Trump) and filtered down through the skinheads, Neonazis, etc. until it reached the uninformed, ignorant, and gullible -- never realizing they were being played for fools against their own best interests. Even now, despite all of the EVIDENCE proving that Brexit was a terrible mistake for ALL citizens of the UK and that its supporters were tricked by Putin's proxies into sabotaging their own nation, you're still here defending these well-known lies as if they were ever true. Not only are they not true. They NEVER were. So, when are you going to realize that you were lied to and actually get angry at the liars and charlatans who lied to you, instead of blaming the innocent people they lied to you about?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!