Best use of 4 disks in RAID


Recommended Posts

What is the best use of 4 disks which gives me most storage but with some form of data redundancy? I was just going to mirror 2 disks to the other 2 but that's obviously not the best use of space. Can striped with parity work with 4 disks? I was always always under the impression its a 3 drive operation (stripes on 2, parity on 1) but would like to be corrected.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1097369-best-use-of-4-disks-in-raid/
Share on other sites

It really depends on what you need out of it. If data integrity is the absolute most important then RAID 1.

If you need integrity and more space than a single drive offers, RAID10. RAID10 will give you the highest level of data redundancy (a complete mirror!) but not as much space as RAID-5. But think about it... one drive fails, and you're without your data for hours to days while it rebuilds (if it completes...)

I don't recommend RAID-5. It's becoming more likely to fail. Raid-6 if you MUST, but don't RAID-5.

http://www.smbitjour...-more-reliable/

http://www.smbitjour...-or-a-hot-mess/

RAID5.jpeg

  On 09/08/2012 at 22:28, Tony. said:

RAID-5 is probably the best option. RAID-0+1 would just half the amount of storage you have available. As for the comment above about RAID-5 reliability, software RAID is risky business anyways.

The first link was for you then ;)

6TB RAID-5, 50% chance of URE. 12TB, 100% chance. 3TB array, 25%.

"6TB RAID-5, 50% chance of URE. 12TB, 100% chance. 3TB array, 25%."

I don't think your doing the math right..

http://www.raidtips.com/raid5-ure.aspx

This scare mongering has been around for many many years.. Raid 5 was suppose to be dead in 2009, its mid 2012.. So something is not quite right.

I agree with you that there are lots of articles saying that raid 5 is dead.. But strangely its not ;)

What I would suggest, is if you have data that your worried about it being offline - which is the whole reason of raid. That you feel you should run raid, I would make SURE you have BACKUP!!! Raid is not a BACKUP!!

Raid with parity is a method of mitigating having to restore from backup, on minor hardware failure (1 disk out of many).

What disks do you have? Not all disks are good choices for raids, and yes a rebuild can put a strain on your other disks as they are hit to rebuild the failed one. So if they are not in good shape, its possible they could fail on a rebuild.

As mentioned in the article I linked too that points out what is being said might be a bit exaggerated lets say. Lets look at this statement from your link

"the rate of URE is 10^14, or once every twelve terabytes of read operations. That means that a six terabyte array being resilvered has a roughly fifty percent chance of hitting a URE and failing."

I don't buy that, for starters sure a URE could be a major problem - but I don't buy his math on the likelyhood of hitting one. For starters who says there is 6TB of data on my 6TB array that needs to be rebuilt? Do you run your ARRAY at 100% Cap?? So your 6TB array has what being used 3TB? Which is stripped over all the disks in the array right. So for 6TB of data your talking 4x2TB (you loose 1 disk for parity in raid 5 right - which is striped across all disks)

So my 3TB of data is striped across 4 disks with the added parity your talking 4TB of written stuff (3TB of data and 1TB of party), or 1TB on each disk. So to restore that data you have to read 1TB off each disk that is left in your 4disk array. The raid magic then happens and using parity recreates the 1TB that is gone off the failed disk.

So if each disk could have a bad sector that could cause a URE - what are the odds that its in the 1TB I am going to read off each disk? I don't think its as simple as they are saying that a URE happens in every 12TB of read data.

What I am trying to say is don't take these Doom Sayers as gospel.. If that was true - raid 5 would of been dead back in 2009 like they were saying ;) Its 2012 and raid 5 is still here. Like they are saying raid 6 will be dead in 2019 ;)

edit: As to the OP question at hand - even though I think raid 5 is still a viable option. I would prob not go that route myself, there are many many different options these days with newer ways to use your diskspace while still providing parity and ability to rebuild data on loss of disk. Unraid comes to mind, snapraid, flexraid. There are also methods of just keeping your critical data on your storage on more than one disk, while not having to create parity for every single bit. Drive extender, DrivePool from stablebit, etc. etc. Im currently using drivepool for my storage needs. It allows me to assign folders in my storage that need to be stored on more than 1 disk, so that if 1 disk fails I don't have to worry about restoring those files from backup.

Because most of my data I would never backup or even worry about restore if lost, but some of it I do backup!! And is critical - so I just keep multiple copies of it on multiple disks in my storage array.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Lets assume that we are capitalists and right wing people for a sec. - The individual should be able to accrue wealth and no government should limit that wealth growth. - That same individual should not be taxed any higher than the average person. Tax is a socialist construct to help those in that country who are less fortunate, and it limits wealth growth. - This individual should be able to do whatever they want to do with their money and have no restrictions, as it would otherwise limit wealth growth. So having said all that with the mindset of a capitalist and small government political leaning, he can do what he want with it. Some billionaires have little pet projects to inflate their self worth like rocket ships and stuff, this is just a bit different is al, and probably the more compassionate of choices. I think he's seen a need, and that need isn't in the USA.
    • I'm concerned about this, too. How can he make sure that the money is actually used for good instead of ending up in the pockets of crooked politics and warlords? I think that's a problem.
    • Sony unveils its first fight stick 'Project Defiant', supports PC and PS5 by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe In a surprise twist, Sony announced a new piece of hardware at its State of Play presentation today. Currently going by the codename Project Defiant, it is Sony's first attempt at making a fight stick. Considering the company is currently partnered with Marvel to make a first-party fighting game featuring heroes and villains from the popular comic universe, this seems to be the right time to unveil the project. As seen in the teaser trailer above, the wireless fight stick follows the modern black and white PlayStation hardware style of the consoles and standard gamepad controllers. The controller will ship with a toolless design for changing the restrictor gates, with square, circle, and octagon options incoming for the stick. Meanwhile, the buttons are confirmed to have mechanical switches. Plus, a dedicated touchpad, much like on the DualSense controller, is available on the top of the fight stick. "It’s built in a sturdy, ergonomic design for a comfortable feel during intense fight sessions," adds the company. Sony is leveraging its PlayStation Link technology in the device. With it, the company is promising ultra-low latency wireless connectivity, making sure it provides players "precise in-game response to each button press and digital stick movement." Interestingly, PlayStation Link is Sony's proprietary wireless connectivity standard designed for PlayStation 5's audio transmissions, which is now being used a little differently for this piece of hardware. The controller has built-in storage for holding both the restrictor gates and the PS Link USB adapter. As expected, a wired connection is also possible, with a USB-C port available on the device for connecting to a PlayStation 5 or PC. To make sure the device remains in good condition during travel, Sony is throwing in a sturdy sling carry case with each Project Defiant fight stick. More details, like the official name, internal hardware, release date, and most importantly, price, will be revealed later. The hardware has a 2026 launch window right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Apprentice
      DarkShrunken went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dedicated
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      DarkShrunken earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      351
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      167
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      164
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      162
    5. 5
      Xenon
      128
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!