Best use of 4 disks in RAID


Recommended Posts

What is the best use of 4 disks which gives me most storage but with some form of data redundancy? I was just going to mirror 2 disks to the other 2 but that's obviously not the best use of space. Can striped with parity work with 4 disks? I was always always under the impression its a 3 drive operation (stripes on 2, parity on 1) but would like to be corrected.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1097369-best-use-of-4-disks-in-raid/
Share on other sites

It really depends on what you need out of it. If data integrity is the absolute most important then RAID 1.

If you need integrity and more space than a single drive offers, RAID10. RAID10 will give you the highest level of data redundancy (a complete mirror!) but not as much space as RAID-5. But think about it... one drive fails, and you're without your data for hours to days while it rebuilds (if it completes...)

I don't recommend RAID-5. It's becoming more likely to fail. Raid-6 if you MUST, but don't RAID-5.

http://www.smbitjour...-more-reliable/

http://www.smbitjour...-or-a-hot-mess/

RAID5.jpeg

  On 09/08/2012 at 22:28, Tony. said:

RAID-5 is probably the best option. RAID-0+1 would just half the amount of storage you have available. As for the comment above about RAID-5 reliability, software RAID is risky business anyways.

The first link was for you then ;)

6TB RAID-5, 50% chance of URE. 12TB, 100% chance. 3TB array, 25%.

"6TB RAID-5, 50% chance of URE. 12TB, 100% chance. 3TB array, 25%."

I don't think your doing the math right..

http://www.raidtips.com/raid5-ure.aspx

This scare mongering has been around for many many years.. Raid 5 was suppose to be dead in 2009, its mid 2012.. So something is not quite right.

I agree with you that there are lots of articles saying that raid 5 is dead.. But strangely its not ;)

What I would suggest, is if you have data that your worried about it being offline - which is the whole reason of raid. That you feel you should run raid, I would make SURE you have BACKUP!!! Raid is not a BACKUP!!

Raid with parity is a method of mitigating having to restore from backup, on minor hardware failure (1 disk out of many).

What disks do you have? Not all disks are good choices for raids, and yes a rebuild can put a strain on your other disks as they are hit to rebuild the failed one. So if they are not in good shape, its possible they could fail on a rebuild.

As mentioned in the article I linked too that points out what is being said might be a bit exaggerated lets say. Lets look at this statement from your link

"the rate of URE is 10^14, or once every twelve terabytes of read operations. That means that a six terabyte array being resilvered has a roughly fifty percent chance of hitting a URE and failing."

I don't buy that, for starters sure a URE could be a major problem - but I don't buy his math on the likelyhood of hitting one. For starters who says there is 6TB of data on my 6TB array that needs to be rebuilt? Do you run your ARRAY at 100% Cap?? So your 6TB array has what being used 3TB? Which is stripped over all the disks in the array right. So for 6TB of data your talking 4x2TB (you loose 1 disk for parity in raid 5 right - which is striped across all disks)

So my 3TB of data is striped across 4 disks with the added parity your talking 4TB of written stuff (3TB of data and 1TB of party), or 1TB on each disk. So to restore that data you have to read 1TB off each disk that is left in your 4disk array. The raid magic then happens and using parity recreates the 1TB that is gone off the failed disk.

So if each disk could have a bad sector that could cause a URE - what are the odds that its in the 1TB I am going to read off each disk? I don't think its as simple as they are saying that a URE happens in every 12TB of read data.

What I am trying to say is don't take these Doom Sayers as gospel.. If that was true - raid 5 would of been dead back in 2009 like they were saying ;) Its 2012 and raid 5 is still here. Like they are saying raid 6 will be dead in 2019 ;)

edit: As to the OP question at hand - even though I think raid 5 is still a viable option. I would prob not go that route myself, there are many many different options these days with newer ways to use your diskspace while still providing parity and ability to rebuild data on loss of disk. Unraid comes to mind, snapraid, flexraid. There are also methods of just keeping your critical data on your storage on more than one disk, while not having to create parity for every single bit. Drive extender, DrivePool from stablebit, etc. etc. Im currently using drivepool for my storage needs. It allows me to assign folders in my storage that need to be stored on more than 1 disk, so that if 1 disk fails I don't have to worry about restoring those files from backup.

Because most of my data I would never backup or even worry about restore if lost, but some of it I do backup!! And is critical - so I just keep multiple copies of it on multiple disks in my storage array.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Apple is making a scary move: a private company overchallenging a legit government and legislation. I am not a fan of democracy, but I am more scared of corporatism. The EU must take a strong stance now: Apple should comply with the law or face consequences, and it must do so immediately.
    • Intel LGA1700 14th Gen i5-14600K and 12th Gen 12600K are selling for great prices by Sayan Sen Intel is back again with another great CPU sale. We reported on the 14600K deal recently, which is now available for an even better price of just $195, and this includes a free AIO liquid cooler (purchase link under the specs list below). Aside from the 14th Gen i5, the 12th Gen 12600K is also available for just $125 (purchase link under the specs list below). Both chips are compatible with LGA1700 socket. First up, we have the Intel 14600K. The chip performs about as well as an AMD Ryzen 7600(X) in gaming and beats it in productivity. Since this is a socket LGA1700 SKU, buyers are advised to pair it up with a decent motherboard that has good VRM power delivery and cooling in place (ideally a Z790 chipset motherboard), plus you will need a good quality air cooler (and a complementary good case with excellent airflow) or a 240/280 mm AIO liquid cooler. The free MSI AIO cooler that comes with the bundle should suffice even for some moderate overclocking. Yes, overclocking is possible on both the 14600K and 12600K, as they are both K SKUs and thus are unlocked chips. The technical specs of the 14600K are given below: Core Count: 14 (6 Performance Cores + 8 Efficiency Cores) Thread Count: 20 Base Clock Frequency: 3.5 GHz (P-core), 2.6 GHz (E-core) Boost Clock Frequency: Up to 5.3 GHz Cache: 24 MB Cache Stock Memory Support: DDR4 (3200 MT/s) and DDR5 (5600 MT/s) Socket: LGA 1700 Base TDP: 125 W Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 770 PCIe Support: PCIe Gen 5 and Gen 4 (16 lanes) Process Technology: Intel 7 (10 nm) Maximum Temperature: 100° C Get the 14600K at the link below: Intel Core i5-14600K BX8071514600K (additional $5 off w/ promo code SSET237, limited offer) + MSI MAG Coreliquid A13 240mm Liquid Cooler + Free Intel Spring Bundle (Civilization VII & Dying Light: The Beast): $194.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US first-party seller) Up next we have the Core i5-12600K which tends to slot right in between Ryzen's 5000 series and 7000 series in gaming performance, typically trading blows with the 5800X3D. In productivity, it can get even with Ryzen's 7600(X) or a 5900X. The technical specs of the 12600K are given below: Core Count: 10 (6 Performance Cores + 4 Efficiency Cores) Thread Count: 16 Base Clock Frequency: 3.7 GHz (P-core), 2.8 GHz (E-core) Boost Clock Frequency: Up to 4.9 GHz Cache: 20 MB Cache Stock Memory Support: DDR4 (3200 MT/s) and DDR5 (4800 MT/s) Socket: LGA 1700 Base TDP: 125 W Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 770 PCIe Support: PCIe Gen 5 and Gen 4 (16 lanes) Process Technology: Intel 7 (10 nm) Maximum Temperature: 100° C Get the 12600K at the link below: Core i5-12600K Processor Box, BX8071512600K: $125.33 (Amazon US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yes, this should have the Sponsored tag on it methinks.
    • Is there a conversion kit available so we can make it not look like something from a low-polygon video game from the 1990s?
    • "The company's core argument is that the changes mandated by the EU's DMA, which came into full effect in March 2024, introduce serious security and privacy risks for users. Apple claims that allowing sideloading and alternative app stores effectively opens the door for malware, fraud, scams, and other harmful content." I've heard this anti-sideloading argument a lot, but only from people who never wanted to sideload and will never do (so no risks for them), and from Apple themselves.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      EdwardFranciscoVilla earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      MoyaM earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      qology earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Frinco90 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Apprentice
      Frinco90 went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      453
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      247
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      240
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      196
    5. 5
      Xenon
      142
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!