Raid users - your experiences


Recommended Posts

I don't know of any hardware raid cards which can support what you want. But to be honest ZFS is better anyway. I've read quite a few studies on the reliability of ZFS and in every one it has been found to be much more reliable than hardware RAID cards.

So it has a lot of benefits such as..

File Deduplication (Although this needs a lot of RAM and isn't recommended to use right now)

3 Disk Parity instead of dual like RAID6

Use different sized disks

Constantly checks the least accessed sectors of your disks for consistency so data corruption doesn't creep up on you

A lot more cost effective because you can use cheap interface cards instead of expensive raid cards

Doesn't care if disks have TLER or not because it will happily wait for a disk to complete its 1+ Minute recovery of bad sectors without dropping the disks from the array.

With all these pros the only reason not to use ZFS is that choosing it pretty much dictates your chosen operating system to FreeBSD, FreeNAS or Solaris. Apart from that it is the perfect storage system.

That was what I suspected. I don't really want to go the ZFS route because I don't want to learn administration of a *nix/BSD system. Storage spaces has me very interested but I wouldn't exactly describe it as trusted yet.

That was what I suspected. I don't really want to go the ZFS route because I don't want to learn administration of a *nix/BSD system. Storage spaces has me very interested but I wouldn't exactly describe it as trusted yet.

I feel the same way, personally my main server runs Windows Server 2008 R2. And although I want to use ZFS I can't make the sacrifice of switching operating systems at this point. It just doesn't make sense in my infrastructure but I would love to be able to use it one day. Right now I'm using Dedicated Raid Cards with Intel CPU's SAS Expander cards and RAID6.

I feel the same way, personally my main server runs Windows Server 2008 R2. And although I want to use ZFS I can't make the sacrifice of switching operating systems at this point. It just doesn't make sense in my infrastructure but I would love to be able to use it one day. Right now I'm using Dedicated Raid Cards with Intel CPU's SAS Expander cards and RAID6.

I am building my server and right now it is running as a test rig with WHS2011. I am seriously thinking of going Server 2012 Essentials.

I have 4 x 2.5" bays and 4x3.5" bays with a RAID0/1/10/5/50 card. Ideally I would like to make a single large storage pool but the largest 2.5" TLER friendly drive would be 1TB but 1TB would be a waste in the 3.5" bays where 2/3TB per bay sounds more sensible.

No it wasn't clear because you said expanding. Expanding an array is completely possible if you use the same sized disks or larger disks. It is known as Online Capacity Expansion or OCE and it is common in RAID language to say Expanding when adding an extra disk to a pre-existing array.

If you had 250GB + 250GB + 250GB + 250GB and then added a 1TB disk to that array you can expand that array. But that array won't be expanded by 1TB, only an extra 250GB with the remaining 750GB of that 1TB disk going unused.

What you should have said in your original post was that you wanted to change from lower capacity disks to higher capacity disks you then have to replace all your old disks in the array. Saying expanding the array makes it sound like you are unable to expand the array in any way at all.

In your post here:

You never mentioned what your current RAID array was made up as. I believed from your post that your RAID5 array was already made up of 3TB disks and you merely wanted to add more disks to it and you were saying that you had to add another 4x3TB because your RAID controller wouldn't allow you to only add 1x3TB to your pre-existing array. You didn't make it clear that your array was using much smaller disks and you actually wanted to change disks.

someone else saw that it was pretty clear that i ment expand as in bigger storage space.....

but now we all understand each other :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!