Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

It's already been confirmed (Eurogamer's updated the article); the delay and new release dates were posted on the WMD forum yesterday (which you have to be registered to see).

Not surprised at the delay.  It's an absolute disaster in it's current state.  Only Practice mode is playable right now, and while the graphics looks great, the gameplay is buggy as hell.

 

Unless they're holding out a lot of content from my access level, I would predict the game is roughly 30% complete and they need, at an absolute minimum, another solid year of development.  It needs A LOT of work.  Not to mention there are barely any cars and tracks. It should have at least 3x what it currently has to even be a reasonable game.

 

I am really glad they aren't trying to rush it out because it would immediately be a failure due to how unplayable it is.

  • 5 weeks later...

There's simply no way it will be ready by March.  The game is still barely playable.  Almost all of the race functions don't work.

I get new builds almost daily and while they are making decent progress, it's all too often that new bugs get created with each build.

 

I still think they're realistically at only 30% completion.  This game needs to be in Release Candidate status for at least a few months for the beta testers to report the remaining bugs.  They are well over a year away from that.

 

Even if this game was close to completion, I would be extremely pis*ed to drop $60 on a game that has 20ish cars...

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love this game and play the builds almost daily, but I'm frightened and disappointing at the slow progress and where it's headed.   PC needs a racing sim like this and I really really don't want it to fail.

  • Like 2

There's simply no way it will be ready by March.  The game is still barely playable.  Almost all of the race functions don't work.

I get new builds almost daily and while they are making decent progress, it's all too often that new bugs get created with each build.

 

I still think they're realistically at only 30% completion.  This game needs to be in Release Candidate status for at least a few months for the beta testers to report the remaining bugs.  They are well over a year away from that.

 

Even if this game was close to completion, I would be extremely pis*ed to drop $60 on a game that has 20ish cars...

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love this game and play the builds almost daily, but I'm frightened and disappointing at the slow progress and where it's headed.   PC needs a racing sim like this and I really really don't want it to fail.

Do you have to be a dev to have access or pay?

 

Without the obvious branding, is this better than https://www.lfs.net/ ?

If you play the game daily and enjoy it, presumably getting tens if not hundreds of hours of enjoyment out of it, how is it not worth 60?

 

The bigger issue is how/if they will be able to pay back their investors, as this game instead of going with traditional crowd funding decided to create their own system where everyone would be a micro investor and be owed a percentage of the profits...

Do you have to be a dev to have access or pay?

 

Without the obvious branding, is this better than https://www.lfs.net/ ?

There was some sort of crowd-funding thing a while back (Kickstarter maybe). So since I contributed some money, I got access to the dev builds on Steam.

 

Man, I haven't played LFS in probably almost 10 years.  Content-wise, I'm sure that game is as good as it gets.  Graphics seem to still be "meh".

The wow-factor of Project Cars is the straight up amazing graphics.  It's better than anything else out there (Forza, Drive Club, etc).  The driving mechanics are pretty solid and the sounds are great too.  So there is a solid foundation, but the actual gameplay and organization of the game is in shambles.

If you play the game daily and enjoy it, presumably getting tens if not hundreds of hours of enjoyment out of it, how is it not worth 60?

 

The bigger issue is how/if they will be able to pay back their investors, as this game instead of going with traditional crowd funding decided to create their own system where everyone would be a micro investor and be owed a percentage of the profits...

I think you're comparing apples to oranges here.  I'm essentially a "beta" tester, which is the only reason I play it so much.

 

If I were to buy this game for $60, having never played it before, it would be really disappointing because of how little you can do. 20-30 cars and tracks and only practice and quick race works.  Forza is essentially 1000 times more of a game than this but with slightly worse graphics.

 

The issue with this game (besides not being anywhere near done), is that it needs way more included content.  There's no reason why it shouldn't have hundreds of cars like every other racing game out there.  There's no way they could market it with such little content, especially since you need a beast of a rig to run this game in it's full glory.  My 680 SLI gets crushed when I crank it all the way up (the detailed grass setting is what really tanks it).  Porting this to Wii U is stupid, and I really worry about PS4 and X1 being able to play it smoothly.  Too much work is being put into the console crap, and it's severely killing the game as a whole.

To be honest, its the only way they'll afford to add more cars, especially if they insist on modeling non essential mechanics inside the cars as they are now. Modeling a single car is ridiculously expensive, on top of that they need to license it, and due to the technical detail level they go into they may be blocked from even the chance at getting a license.

 

Besides the consoles aren't really more work. Unless they plan only the rich kid gamers with top of the line rigs to buy it. they already have the lower res resources available.


I'm pretty sure this company will tank shortly after release anyway, and anyone who bought it will be left with an unfinished game and no updates are dlc/addons :/

To be honest, its the only way they'll afford to add more cars, especially if they insist on modeling non essential mechanics inside the cars as they are now. Modeling a single car is ridiculously expensive, on top of that they need to license it, and due to the technical detail level they go into they may be blocked from even the chance at getting a license.

 

Besides the consoles aren't really more work. Unless they plan only the rich kid gamers with top of the line rigs to buy it. they already have the lower res resources available.

I'm pretty sure this company will tank shortly after release anyway, and anyone who bought it will be left with an unfinished game and no updates are dlc/addons :/

 They did make Grid Autosport, which has a ton of cars, so surely there has to be a way to import those models in some form.

The last time I played this game (sometime last month), it still had very poor driving characteristics, and the physics were just wrong. Honestly if I bought this game for anything more than $10-$15, I would not be very happy. 

  • Like 1

I'm not part of any testing but I saw the sheet that outlines how much you can pay to be different levels etc and some of them were crazy money.

 

From what I have seen of the gameplay, screenshots etc it "looks" excellent, and videos seem to show quite good gameplay and I like the concept behind the story line so fingers crossed its good.

 

I know that the game doesn't recognise gamepads correctly so if you try and use it without configuring it is almost unplayable and the same goes for some steering wheel/pedal combinations.

 

I just hope they fix the defaults before release as its caused a bit of noise on various forums.

From what I recall, the Xbox 360 controller works for the most part OOB, but you can tweak the settings if you want.

 

The game does look amazing, but it can bring my Haswell i5/GTX 770 to its knees at 1080p settings. Like I said, the physics and driving model is just not up to par to games like Forza, or GT5/6, though that is the type of sim they are aiming for. 

 They did make Grid Autosport, which has a ton of cars, so surely there has to be a way to import those models in some form.

That was Codemasters; Slightly Mad Studios weren't involved in that game in any way.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!