Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

It's already been confirmed (Eurogamer's updated the article); the delay and new release dates were posted on the WMD forum yesterday (which you have to be registered to see).

Not surprised at the delay.  It's an absolute disaster in it's current state.  Only Practice mode is playable right now, and while the graphics looks great, the gameplay is buggy as hell.

 

Unless they're holding out a lot of content from my access level, I would predict the game is roughly 30% complete and they need, at an absolute minimum, another solid year of development.  It needs A LOT of work.  Not to mention there are barely any cars and tracks. It should have at least 3x what it currently has to even be a reasonable game.

 

I am really glad they aren't trying to rush it out because it would immediately be a failure due to how unplayable it is.

  • 5 weeks later...

There's simply no way it will be ready by March.  The game is still barely playable.  Almost all of the race functions don't work.

I get new builds almost daily and while they are making decent progress, it's all too often that new bugs get created with each build.

 

I still think they're realistically at only 30% completion.  This game needs to be in Release Candidate status for at least a few months for the beta testers to report the remaining bugs.  They are well over a year away from that.

 

Even if this game was close to completion, I would be extremely pis*ed to drop $60 on a game that has 20ish cars...

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love this game and play the builds almost daily, but I'm frightened and disappointing at the slow progress and where it's headed.   PC needs a racing sim like this and I really really don't want it to fail.

  • Like 2

There's simply no way it will be ready by March.  The game is still barely playable.  Almost all of the race functions don't work.

I get new builds almost daily and while they are making decent progress, it's all too often that new bugs get created with each build.

 

I still think they're realistically at only 30% completion.  This game needs to be in Release Candidate status for at least a few months for the beta testers to report the remaining bugs.  They are well over a year away from that.

 

Even if this game was close to completion, I would be extremely pis*ed to drop $60 on a game that has 20ish cars...

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love this game and play the builds almost daily, but I'm frightened and disappointing at the slow progress and where it's headed.   PC needs a racing sim like this and I really really don't want it to fail.

Do you have to be a dev to have access or pay?

 

Without the obvious branding, is this better than https://www.lfs.net/ ?

If you play the game daily and enjoy it, presumably getting tens if not hundreds of hours of enjoyment out of it, how is it not worth 60?

 

The bigger issue is how/if they will be able to pay back their investors, as this game instead of going with traditional crowd funding decided to create their own system where everyone would be a micro investor and be owed a percentage of the profits...

Do you have to be a dev to have access or pay?

 

Without the obvious branding, is this better than https://www.lfs.net/ ?

There was some sort of crowd-funding thing a while back (Kickstarter maybe). So since I contributed some money, I got access to the dev builds on Steam.

 

Man, I haven't played LFS in probably almost 10 years.  Content-wise, I'm sure that game is as good as it gets.  Graphics seem to still be "meh".

The wow-factor of Project Cars is the straight up amazing graphics.  It's better than anything else out there (Forza, Drive Club, etc).  The driving mechanics are pretty solid and the sounds are great too.  So there is a solid foundation, but the actual gameplay and organization of the game is in shambles.

If you play the game daily and enjoy it, presumably getting tens if not hundreds of hours of enjoyment out of it, how is it not worth 60?

 

The bigger issue is how/if they will be able to pay back their investors, as this game instead of going with traditional crowd funding decided to create their own system where everyone would be a micro investor and be owed a percentage of the profits...

I think you're comparing apples to oranges here.  I'm essentially a "beta" tester, which is the only reason I play it so much.

 

If I were to buy this game for $60, having never played it before, it would be really disappointing because of how little you can do. 20-30 cars and tracks and only practice and quick race works.  Forza is essentially 1000 times more of a game than this but with slightly worse graphics.

 

The issue with this game (besides not being anywhere near done), is that it needs way more included content.  There's no reason why it shouldn't have hundreds of cars like every other racing game out there.  There's no way they could market it with such little content, especially since you need a beast of a rig to run this game in it's full glory.  My 680 SLI gets crushed when I crank it all the way up (the detailed grass setting is what really tanks it).  Porting this to Wii U is stupid, and I really worry about PS4 and X1 being able to play it smoothly.  Too much work is being put into the console crap, and it's severely killing the game as a whole.

To be honest, its the only way they'll afford to add more cars, especially if they insist on modeling non essential mechanics inside the cars as they are now. Modeling a single car is ridiculously expensive, on top of that they need to license it, and due to the technical detail level they go into they may be blocked from even the chance at getting a license.

 

Besides the consoles aren't really more work. Unless they plan only the rich kid gamers with top of the line rigs to buy it. they already have the lower res resources available.


I'm pretty sure this company will tank shortly after release anyway, and anyone who bought it will be left with an unfinished game and no updates are dlc/addons :/

To be honest, its the only way they'll afford to add more cars, especially if they insist on modeling non essential mechanics inside the cars as they are now. Modeling a single car is ridiculously expensive, on top of that they need to license it, and due to the technical detail level they go into they may be blocked from even the chance at getting a license.

 

Besides the consoles aren't really more work. Unless they plan only the rich kid gamers with top of the line rigs to buy it. they already have the lower res resources available.

I'm pretty sure this company will tank shortly after release anyway, and anyone who bought it will be left with an unfinished game and no updates are dlc/addons :/

 They did make Grid Autosport, which has a ton of cars, so surely there has to be a way to import those models in some form.

The last time I played this game (sometime last month), it still had very poor driving characteristics, and the physics were just wrong. Honestly if I bought this game for anything more than $10-$15, I would not be very happy. 

  • Like 1

I'm not part of any testing but I saw the sheet that outlines how much you can pay to be different levels etc and some of them were crazy money.

 

From what I have seen of the gameplay, screenshots etc it "looks" excellent, and videos seem to show quite good gameplay and I like the concept behind the story line so fingers crossed its good.

 

I know that the game doesn't recognise gamepads correctly so if you try and use it without configuring it is almost unplayable and the same goes for some steering wheel/pedal combinations.

 

I just hope they fix the defaults before release as its caused a bit of noise on various forums.

From what I recall, the Xbox 360 controller works for the most part OOB, but you can tweak the settings if you want.

 

The game does look amazing, but it can bring my Haswell i5/GTX 770 to its knees at 1080p settings. Like I said, the physics and driving model is just not up to par to games like Forza, or GT5/6, though that is the type of sim they are aiming for. 

 They did make Grid Autosport, which has a ton of cars, so surely there has to be a way to import those models in some form.

That was Codemasters; Slightly Mad Studios weren't involved in that game in any way.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      227
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!