Solve 6-1x0+2/2


Recommended Posts

I was always told that things were done in this order.

So:

6 - 1 x 0 + 2 / 2

6 - (1 x 0) + (2 / 2)

6 - 0 + 1

7

It irks me how people are getting this wrong all over facebook. I recall being taught this at the age of 14 (ish - working out where I was in school based upon where I remember sitting).

People are typing it directly as shown into a calculator, and swearing blind that they are right - because the calculator says so. I have 2 A-Levels in Mathetmatics (pure and statistics) and yet people with less than a GSCE wish to tell me I am wrong. FML!

Who cares if people get it right or wrong.

I, for one, care whether people are able to solve a very basic arithmetic problem. It's representative of the overall level of numeracy.

But yes, it should never be written in such a way.

  • Like 1

My faith in humanity is restored as most people here are getting it right :D

People that get 1 think that you solve it left to right.

People that get 3.5 think that you solve it left to right AND 5x0 = 5.

I don't really call people thick or anything like that, but if people post calling others thick they should be damn sure they're right in the first place :laugh:

it doesn't matter if you solve it left to right or right to left. Adding integers is most certainly a commutative operation

When I first saw this equation, it really irked me how it was setup. So I got it wrong at first. Then I remembered BODMAS. I maybe an old Jarhead, but my brain does still work without having orders from time to time. ;)

I get 7. I think order is multiplication, division, summation, subtraction. So 1x0 =0; 2/2 = 1; 6-0+1=7. But I could be completely wrong. In science and engineering, only an idiot would write out an equation like that. Scientist and Engineers strive to be specific as possible in their formulations and add parenthesis for clarity even when they aren't needed.

I was always told that things were done in this order.

So:

6 - 1 x 0 + 2 / 2

6 - (1 x 0) + (2 / 2)

6 - 0 + 1

7

It irks me how people are getting this wrong all over facebook. I recall being taught this at the age of 14 (ish - working out where I was in school based upon where I remember sitting).

People are typing it directly as shown into a calculator, and swearing blind that they are right - because the calculator says so. I have 2 A-Levels in Mathetmatics (pure and statistics) and yet people with less than a GSCE wish to tell me I am wrong. FML!

I don't mind people getting it wrong (so long as they're not accountants :p), just hate the cockiness of people saying "You need to go back to school" etc. when they're actually wrong.

Who cares if people get it right or wrong.

The matter of the fact is you'll never see such an equation in a book as it would be a terrible book.

Seeing equations wrote like this one anger me more than people who fail to answer it.

I don't care if people get it wrong, it's the attitude of people who insist they're right and everyone else is an idiot even though they did it completely wrong. Someone even said to me "Who the hell are you to say what the order of operations is" :laugh:

it doesn't matter if you solve it left to right or right to left. Adding integers is most certainly a commutative operation

By that I meant in the order that the sums appear. You need to do it in the BODMAS/PEMDAS order otherwise it's wrong.

It's 7. However, BODMAS and PEDMAS are both silly; Division is the inverse of multiplication (special rule for divide by 0, of course) and subtraction is the inverse of addition, so they have the same priority, so you're supposed to do stuff left to right in that case.

For example:

6 % 2 == 6 * (0.5) and

6 - 3 == 6 + -3

So, if you used PEDMAS on 6*2-3+5*2, you'd end up doing addition before subtraction, that is, (6*2)-(3+(5*2)) == -1, which is obviously not the same as 6*2-3+5*2 == (((6*2)-3)+(5*2)) == 19

It's 7. However, BODMAS and PEDMAS are both silly; Division is the inverse of multiplication (special rule for divide by 0, of course) and subtraction is the inverse of addition, so they have the same priority, so you're supposed to do stuff left to right in that case.

For example:

6 % 2 == 6 * (0.5) and

6 - 3 == 6 + -3

So, if you used PEDMAS on 6*2-3+5*2, you'd end up doing addition before subtraction, that is, (6*2)-(3+(5*2)) == -1, which is obviously not the same as 6*2-3+5*2 == (((6*2)-3)+(5*2)) == 19

No PEMDAS is not silly, it is a correct order of operation..

P Parentheses first

E Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)

MD Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)

AS Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)

if you don't get the right answer following that, you are doing it wrong

It's 7. However, BODMAS and PEDMAS are both silly; Division is the inverse of multiplication (special rule for divide by 0, of course) and subtraction is the inverse of addition, so they have the same priority, so you're supposed to do stuff left to right in that case.

For example:

6 % 2 == 6 * (0.5) and

6 - 3 == 6 + -3

So, if you used PEDMAS on 6*2-3+5*2, you'd end up doing addition before subtraction, that is, (6*2)-(3+(5*2)) == -1, which is obviously not the same as 6*2-3+5*2 == (((6*2)-3)+(5*2)) == 19

No you wouldn't do addition before subtraction, that's only if you take the DMAS part too literally and don't understand the actual rules.

B

O

DM (left-to right)

AS (left-to-right)

is the correct order.

These types of open answer equations always make me rage at the stupidity of some people. Math is beautiful in that there is only one correct answer and if you don't have the correct answer, there is no explaining yourself. The idiots who sit there so assured of themselves with the wrong answer without a care just make me want to punch puppies.

No PEMDAS is not silly, it is a correct order of operation..

P Parentheses first

E Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)

MD Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)

AS Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)

if you don't get the right answer following that, you are doing it wrong

No you wouldn't do addition before subtraction, that's only if you take the DMAS part too literally and don't understand the actual rules.

B

O

DM (left-to right)

AS (left-to-right)

is the correct order.

It's true that the order shouldn't be taken literally... but then again anyone who understands the logic really doesnt need PEDMAS or equivalent. Those who use PEDMAS (this thread is good proof) almost always seperate out Division before Multiplication and Addition before Subtraction. In fact I've seen it taught wrong so it's not very suprising so many people don't understand it.Luckily in this instance it works, but it would be interesting to give an equation that requires a thorough understanding of the order of operations.

It's true that the order shouldn't be taken literally... but then again anyone who understands the logic really doesnt need PEDMAS or equivalent. Those who use PEDMAS (this thread is good proof) almost always seperate out Division before Multiplication and Addition before Subtraction. In fact I've seen it taught wrong so it's not very suprising so many people don't understand it.Luckily in this instance it works, but it would be interesting to give an equation that requires a thorough understanding of the order of operations.

Well the fact that it has so many variants is a clue that the order of D/M and A/S isn't important :p

BIMDAS

PEMDAS

BODMAS

BIDMAS

PEDMAS

They're just acronyms used to help people remember the order. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!