Recommended Posts

Im in the process of rebuilding my home network atm and replacing my cisco 1701 that had its wan card killed in a thunder storm with a Cisco 877W to prevent this happening again im running it off the server's UPS and ive installed a surge protector on the phone line.

That just leaves the console port, Considering its a home network ive disabled SSH/telnet and all management will be done through the console port. I plan on plugging it into my KVM/IP switch (HP IP Console)

eea07602.jpg

Which has a male serial port, I have tested it on a dell switch and it works. So the problem is wiring the console port.

i was thinking running a cat-6 upstairs to where the router will be placed and then wireing a socket on one end (t568B) and connecting a patch cable between the routers console port. On the other end i have one of these (with a male end)

b7dec191.jpg

And thats where im lost converting t568B wiring coming in to a rollover serial cable . Should i stick with t568B or wire the whole thing as a rollover cable ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1105021-cisco-console-cable-kvm-ip/
Share on other sites

why not enable ssh (ssh is disabled by default)...the average person isn't going to know that they need a specific software that isn't included in windows nor are they going to understand anything....on top of that you can specify to only allow ssh connections from 1 ip address and give your machine a static IP which would be the IP/machine that would manage it....do you really think that people don't open that port and only allow access from certain IP's on the internet? You don't match the limitation, you don't get access to a logon prompt... Instead you choose to do it the most difficult way possible to do such a simple task.

Id prefer to do the management via console to ensure access to the router while its booting or upgrading etc plus i find it simpler to manage multiple devices using the console rather than software inside an os.

I with sc302, the fact that your on a home network by very nature of "home" makes opening up ssh/telnet really a non issue. Now in a work/edu/public network sure limiting access ssh/telnet because a security problem.

But who exactly in your home would be accessing this other than you?

You seem to be making it harder on yourself vs easier. To be honest how often would you really need console access? Even on firmware upgrade, this can be done via ssh. Do it all the time, only if something goes wrong would you need console access. And then if it did happen, your what like 20ft from the thing?

If you doing it for a fun thing to do, that is one thing. But to be honest I don't see how console access via a kvm is easier than just opening a ssh session directly would be easier. Are you running some software in your OS to access these devices via console, or are you switching over your monitor/keybord to control said device? Because if the later, that is clearly less productive than a simple box open on your current desktop that allows you to freely multitask between your desktop (docs, internet access, copy/paste, etc.) vs console type access pushing a button on keyboard or device to switch what is displayed.

Good luck with your project, but seems wrong direction to me to be honest.

Yeah you are right i was going to do it to cut down on passwords and just have one enable password. Anyway i did put in a dedicated console line i was getting confused with the serial port wireing i just used t686b to extend the console cable they gave and used a gender changer on the serial port.

O_o....cut down on passwords by doing it the most difficult way possible, yep makes lots of sense.

ssh = 1 enable password btw, there is no telnet password. enable ssh.

Your thinking...

you have to get to the other side of the forest, you are given a hand saw, a plane, a car, and a very large digging machine. You have chosen the hand saw to complete your task of getting to the other side of the forest..but once done you have a clear view of what you need to access, but getting there is the most difficult process possible.

O_o....cut down on passwords by doing it the most difficult way possible, yep makes lots of sense.

ssh = 1 enable password btw, there is no telnet password. enable ssh.

Yeah in still learning cisco,

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!