Recommended Posts

Like I said: Maybe, just maybe, if Microsoft started setting the right example themselves on their own platform, third-party developers will follow. But the company couldn't care less.

iTunes is one of the worst applications when it comes to installing a ton of additional services and cluttering my autostart. You can try to shift the blame away from Apple as much as you like but it's not MS' fault, there really is no excuse.

I'm currently seeing screenshots of 10.7 there. 11 doesn't have the left hand side navigation.

http://www.apple.com/itunes/new-itunes/ is the correct URL.

Here's a few more screenshots from the presentation.

Apparently a sidebar showing all of your playlists will automatically slide in from the right when you start dragging items.

I hope you can still switch between several view modes for individual playlists...and that the column browser is still there. I just might stay with 10.7 otherwise.

post-5569-0-15424600-1348231776.jpg

post-5569-0-61711300-1348231791.jpg

post-5569-0-49960000-1348231798.jpg

post-5569-0-46175800-1348231813.jpg

post-5569-0-66522600-1348231819.jpg

post-5569-0-05605500-1348231827.jpg

post-5569-0-70518500-1348231832.jpg

post-5569-0-15653600-1348232019.jpg

  • Like 3

I'm currently seeing screenshots of 10.7 there. 11 doesn't have the left hand side navigation.

The page I linked you to has a big rectangle on it pointing you towards another page dedicated to the new iTunes. Are you simply being very lazy here or purposely being difficult?

iTunes is one of the worst applications when it comes to installing a ton of additional services and cluttering my autostart. You can try to shift the blame away from Apple as much as you like but it's not MS' fault, there really is no excuse.

Where did I shift away the blame for those additional services? Nowhere. Please don't put words in my mouth. I was talking about the non-standard interfaces and major inconsistencies Microsoft themselves are constantly guilty of. All I'm saying is: If Microsoft put some effort into this area and made clean ship others will follow.

Here's a few more screenshots from the presentation.

Looks really nice and clean. (Y) I hope does some nifty animations too.

The revamped Mini Player looks very interesting. I'm curious if it might be a replacement for Bowtie. If it has similar keyboard gestures, I could see myself using it far more than I do now. Having a search field is a very nice addition.

The revamped Mini Player looks very interesting. I'm curious if it might be a replacement for Bowtie. If it has similar keyboard gestures, I could see myself using it far more than I do now. Having a search field is a very nice addition.

keyboard shortcuts? You don't have an Apple keyboard? Hackintosh im guessing.

keyboard shortcuts? You don't have an Apple keyboard? Hackintosh im guessing.

What are you talking about? I was referring to the keyboard shortcuts you can use with Bowtie to skip tracks, etc. If the new Mini Player has similar gestures, it could make a nice replacement.

What are you talking about? I was referring to the keyboard shortcuts you can use with Bowtie to skip tracks, etc. If the new Mini Player has similar gestures, it could make a nice replacement.

I'm just saying for the those that use the Apple keyboard it has native shortcut buttons for play, pause, forward and back which makes the Bowtie shortcuts pointless.

I'm just saying for the those that use the Apple keyboard it has native shortcut buttons for play, pause, forward and back which makes the Bowtie shortcuts pointless.

Not for me, I turn off those functions so I can use F1, F2, etc. (I have it set up so if I want to skip tracks, I do Fn+Function key.)

Personally, I'd rather have better Windows performance than a new UI. No matter what system I run it on, iTunes is always one of the few apps that runs like absolute dog ****.

I don't get this critizism. I mean there has to me something wrong on your end, or you're being hyperbolic & over senstiive. iTunes has always been more than exceptable in terms performance for as long as I can recall. I've used it on many systems running XP, Vista & 7.

index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=318927

I hope there is a way to change the view when browsing playlists, as I prefer to listen by album, I only use playlists to brake down my library by genre, year, etc..

What I hate about iTunes is it installs all of this crap onto your computer and really slows it down. There's:

  1. iTunes - Duh.
  2. QuickTime - Why can't they just bake a video player into iTunes? I think this is an optional install now, if I remember right.
  3. Apple Software Update - I like having my software up to date.
  4. Apple Mobile Device Support - You need to have a program running at all times looking for an iDevice!?! Really?
  5. Bonjour - Why not just have this running when iTunes is up? Bake it in. Get it out of my Control Panel.
  6. Apple Application Support (iTunes 9 or later) - Why do I need pieces of different Apple apps stashed on my computer? Get rid of it!

Really, all I want is a pretty icon that says "iTunes" or "QuickTime"--that's it. Get the other stuff out of my control panel. It looks stupid. Well, at least it's not as Boot camp software. Instead of having literally 30 icons, why can't I have one that says "Boot Camp Support" with a cute picture of the finder guy?

I hope there is a way to change the view when browsing playlists, as I prefer to listen by album, I only use playlists to brake down my library by genre, year, etc..

Exactly - me too! Let's hope Apple didn't screw this up. It's one of the things I really dislike about the iPad music app...

Apple Mobile Device Support - You need to have a program running at all times looking for an iDevice!?! Really?

How is that in any way strange? BlackBerry and Microsoft install helpers on OS X as well to detect whether your device is connected and to automatically launch whatever sync app. As does iTunes on OS X. I don't want that, so I simply got rid of them in System Preferences > Login Items. It's literally a five second job.

This truly is a perfect example of complaining for the sake of complaining.

Really, all I want is a pretty icon that says "iTunes" or "QuickTime"--that's it. Get the other stuff out of my control panel. It looks stupid. Well, at least it's not as Boot camp software. Instead of having literally 30 icons, why can't I have one that says "Boot Camp Support" with a cute picture of the finder guy?

Ending up with a notification tray filled with crap has always been the case on Windows, as long as I remember. It's not like Apple invented that concept. Not to mention the fact there's also third-party software in the Boot Camp package.

How is that in any way strange? BlackBerry and Microsoft install helpers on OS X as well to detect whether your device is connected and to automatically launch whatever sync app. As does iTunes on OS X. I don't want that, so I simply got rid of them in System Preferences > Login Items. It's literally a five second job.

This truly is a perfect example of complaining for the sake of complaining.

Ending up with a notification tray filled with crap has always been the case on Windows, as long as I remember. It's not like Apple invented that concept.

Right but they can control it and/or reduce it. I'm not complaining just because....

Right but they can control it and/or reduce it. I'm not complaining just because....

The iTunes Helper is there to detect whether your device is connected. Other companies have similar solutions even on OS X. So yeah. Don't like it? Simply disable it.

  • Like 2

I don't get this critizism. I mean there has to me something wrong on your end, or you're being hyperbolic & over senstiive. iTunes has always been more than exceptable in terms performance for as long as I can recall. I've used it on many systems running XP, Vista & 7.

The fact that Apple decided in their infinite wisdom to use an XML database instead of a proper SQL-based database causes a lot of these issues. When you're dealing with databases in the 10s of thousands of entries (my music library is somewhere around 50,000 songs) there's a huge amount of delay when starting any program that uses XML databases.

Edit: Here's a good article on the downsides of choosing an XML database and why iTunes has such an issue when using this as its backend. http://gigaom.com/apple/itunes-database-issues/

The iTunes Helper is there to detect whether your device is connected. Other companies have similar solutions even on OS X. So yeah. Don't like it? Simply disable it.

I know. :) I just used CCleaner to disable it (from start up) and it works great. Thanks! I thought it was a driver and wouldn't detect my iDevice completely anymore. I'm quite new to the Apple world so pardon my ignorance. I had a Zune for the longest time.

The fact that Apple decided in their infinite wisdom to use an XML database instead of a proper SQL-based database causes a lot of these issues. When you're dealing with databases in the 10s of thousands of entries (my music library is somewhere around 50,000 songs) there's a huge amount of delay when starting any program that uses XML databases.

Edit: Here's a good article on the downsides of choosing an XML database and why iTunes has such an issue when using this as its backend. http://gigaom.com/ap...atabase-issues/

Interesting. Though I have about 10,000 songs, and don't notice any slowness.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!