Ma New Whip VROOOOOOOOOOM


Recommended Posts

Muhahahah! Got my new car. Well.. My third one in three months. I think this will be the one that I keep and build. It's a project car, but a daily driver as well. It's in great shape, it's 23 years old. It's a pig. It has an Olds 307 V8. It's... HUGE.

Meet my new 1989 Buick Electra Estate Wagon.

465388_4040490928711_1570711363_o.jpg

More pics to follow, it's dark now. Just drove it 500km home. I'm in love. It's like riding on a cloud. All the electronics work, it's got minor cosmetic defects but mechanically all there... Going to take apart the carb this week and give it a thorough cleaning though, running rich, will see what I can nail it down to.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1105919-ma-new-whip-vroooooooooom/
Share on other sites

Muhahahah! Got my new car. Well.. My third one in three months. I think this will be the one that I keep and build. It's a project car, but a daily driver as well. It's in great shape, it's 23 years old. It's a pig. It has an Olds 307 V8. It's... HUGE.

Meet my new 1989 Buick Electra Estate Wagon.

465388_4040490928711_1570711363_o.jpg

More pics to follow, it's dark now. Just drove it 500km home. I'm in love. It's like riding on a cloud. All the electronics work, it's got minor cosmetic defects but mechanically all there... Going to take apart the carb this week and give it a thorough cleaning though, running rich, will see what I can nail it down to.

I love it. Brings back memories. Wished they still made station wagons. I miss them. :cry:

Wow, for a 23 year old car it looks really great. Hope you have lots of fun putting it all in shape. I recently bought a 1990 Volvo 740 GLE and I'm in the process of restoring all the interiors and taking care of a few electrical problems it has but it runs really good and since it's a 4 cylinder it economic enough. It is in very good physical shape all over and just needs a good shine. Think I'll post a few pics when you post yours.

Goodness me, it looks like a tank!

Does it drive allright?

Like a dream. It's no sports car, but it's like riding your couch.

I love it. Brings back memories. Wished they still made station wagons. I miss them. :cry:

I LOVE station wagons. Europe and Australia and the rest of the world still have em, why can't we?

Wow, for a 23 year old car it looks really great. Hope you have lots of fun putting it all in shape. I recently bought a 1990 Volvo 740 GLE and I'm in the process of restoring all the interiors and taking care of a few electrical problems it has but it runs really good and since it's a 4 cylinder it economic enough. It is in very good physical shape all over and just needs a good shine. Think I'll post a few pics when you post yours.

Yes! She's pretty good. I LOVE Volvo wagons. I want a 240 when I'm done with this project. Mine too, needs a paint buff on some spots, a good wash and in the future a vinyl refresh for the wood vinyl. Right now there's one bubble that got poked, and a tiny little fray elsewhere on the vinyl.

Whats the gas milage on these. Yeah I remember people having these. smooth when on the road.

Not entirely sure yet. Going to have to calculate it by hand. The gas gauge SEEMS a little wonky, although for this last part of the trip it was doing fine. Will need to do some further testing.

Like a dream. It's no sports car, but it's like riding your couch.

Congrats, man! You can stiffen the suspension a bit, depending on your budget, to add some character to it!

Wished they still made station wagons. I miss them. :cry:

Unless you and I understand the term differently, there are still plenty of station wagons to choose from )

Congrats, man! You can stiffen the suspension a bit, depending on your budget, to add some character to it!

Unless you and I understand the term differently, there are still plenty of station wagons to choose from )

What you see in that picture is a station wagon. They do not make anything like that in the US anymore.

They still do make station wagons, they are just sit a little higher and are now called SUV's. But don't tell the SUV owners, they will get bent out of shape.

I agree, plus there are minivans nowadays out there too. However, I actually had in mind models like MB E-Class Wagon, Audi A6 Avant/Allroad, Volvo XC70, etc.

Ford stopped making it, but the Taurus Wagon was one of the last "true" station wagons sold here

Could you explain what qualifies for a "true" station wagon?

What you see in that picture is a station wagon. They do not make anything like that in the US anymore.

I suppose, if it's not American, it's not a true station wagon, is it?

Congrats, man! You can stiffen the suspension a bit, depending on your budget, to add some character to it!

Unless you and I understand the term differently, there are still plenty of station wagons to choose from )

Yeah, I plan on throwing stiffer Bilsteins all round.

They still do make station wagons, they are just sit a little higher and are now called SUV's. But don't tell the SUV owners, they will get bent out of shape.

drop this closer to the ground and add some wood trim

suburban.jpg

Gary%20Schneider%20Family%20Truckster%2003.jpg

The Olds 307 in this monster is dog-slow. Looking for an Olds 350

2007DodgeMagnum01.jpg

You guys forgot this!

Anyway that car you got is quite interesting!

No I didn't forget that monstrosity...that brand is dead to me.

Sorry. Not a true station wagon in my opinion. We have a Cadillac Escalade. But it isn't a true station wagon.

What classifies as a "true station wagon"? what manufacturers label it as? the interior capacity? I believe insurance companies still label them as wagons, not suv's or maybe that is dmv...I dont remember, but I do know that they are classified as wagons, not trucks or light trucks or the moniker "sport utility vehicle". So however the manufacturer labels it....they can label it pink purple dotted flying unicorn, that won't change what it is.

No I didn't forget that monstrosity...that brand is dead to me.

What classifies as a "true station wagon"? what manufacturers label it as? the interior capacity? I believe insurance companies still label them as wagons, not suv's or maybe that is dmv...I dont remember, but I do know that they are classified as wagons, not trucks or light trucks or the moniker "sport utility vehicle". So however the manufacturer labels it....they can label it pink purple dotted flying unicorn, that won't change what it is.

For me, it is the classic look, that when you see it, your mind tells you: station wagon!

Classic station wagon:

465388_4040490928711_1570711363_o.jpg

Classic station wagon:

Gary%20Schneider%20Family%20Truckster%2003.jpg

I look at a suv and think raised up station wagon. they have that long nose, that long rear window, many have (or at least used to have reversible rear seats), newer station wagons had level folding rear seats so that you had more trunk room which the suv's have as well, 3rd row seating (larger suvs have that)....so while the nose has become more aerodynamic, it has retained the same base shape through the years while gaining some height and a refresh to the name so that people would buy it vs calling it a "station wagon". "sport utility vehicle" sounds nicer and is more appealing, but wipe out that name and it in fact is the same vehicle.

I look at a suv and think raised up station wagon. they have that long nose, that long rear window, many have (or at least used to have reversible rear seats), newer station wagons had level folding rear seats so that you had more trunk room which the suv's have as well, 3rd row seating (larger suvs have that)....so while the nose has become more aerodynamic, it has retained the same base shape through the years while gaining some height and a refresh to the name so that people would buy it vs calling it a "station wagon". "sport utility vehicle" sounds nicer and is more appealing, but wipe out that name and it in fact is the same vehicle.

The ONLY difference is that it's taller. SUV's for the most part I mean, different body proportions. My Electra has the same clearance as my buddy's blazer, has truck tires and not car tires and has about 2-3 ft in length. I agree with you on the fact that the SUV is the evolution of the wagon, but I think these wagon-purists (myself included) like the lo-pro body inherent to the wagon.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!