how likely is it to kill the cpu


Recommended Posts

actually i think a more accurate answer than simple vcore shortening life, is rather heat shortening the life of your cpu. you can raise your vcore all you want if you can keep it cool, but generally this is hard. so what you should be asking is how hot can your cpu run safely?

to be honest, i think cpus can take pretty high temps pretty well. if they're under 50 deg you're pretty good. even if you were to go to like 55 deg or something, so your lifespan goes from 10 years to 5 years... i dont think its worth being too concerned about, most ppl get new computers every 3 years anyway. your cpu is already old so you might as well get the most out of it.

actually i think a more accurate answer than simple vcore shortening life, is rather heat shortening the life of your cpu. you can raise your vcore all you want if you can keep it cool, but generally this is hard. so what you should be asking is how hot can your cpu run safely?

to be honest, i think cpus can take pretty high temps pretty well. if they're under 50 deg you're pretty good. even if you were to go to like 55 deg or something, so your lifespan goes from 10 years to 5 years... i dont think its worth being too concerned about, most ppl get new computers every 3 years anyway. your cpu is already old so you might as well get the most out of it.

i concur, its not the volt, its the heat that will inevitably will shorten the life, key is if you keep the heat down the cpu should have a normal lifespan. my rig runs @ 25c idle and 32c load with is below normal however am clocked 2.8c @ 3.5ghz

Altho i agree with every1 that it's the heat is Public Enemy #1, sending more volts thru the tiny transistors inside the CPU doesn't do it any favours. :no:

The main problem is you can pretty much tell what damage heat is doing with sensors and cooling and stuff... how u gonna tell if u just fried a few 0.13 micron transistors??

On the flip side, as long as u don't go crazy most CPU's will last well beyond the point u find them slow, dull and in need of upgrading so i wouldn't lose too much sleep!

At the end of the day it all comes down to choice. Red pill or blue pill? Play it safe and respect the silicon shrine or go full force assuming you'll upgrade soon anyway.

well..my heat is no problem :) when idle i reached a temp of 15 degrees (more often just 18)...and when in full load, for about 1 hour, i reached the 24degrees....and i'm running a 2.6Ghz @ 3.3Ghz i just think i should cool my northbridge to :p it's just a heatsink now...@ 40degrees or smth

god i just love my watercooling :p

but isn;t raising your Vcore mostly ment to stabilize your cpu speed? not to accelerate it?

actually i think a more accurate answer than simple vcore shortening life, is rather heat shortening the life of your cpu. you can raise your vcore all you want if you can keep it cool, but generally this is hard. so what you should be asking is how hot can your cpu run safely?

to be honest, i think cpus can take pretty high temps pretty well. if they're under 50 deg you're pretty good. even if you were to go to like 55 deg or something, so your lifespan goes from 10 years to 5 years... i dont think its worth being too concerned about, most ppl get new computers every 3 years anyway. your cpu is already old so you might as well get the most out of it.

i concur, its not the volt, its the heat that will inevitably will shorten the life, key is if you keep the heat down the cpu should have a normal lifespan. my rig runs @ 25c idle and 32c load with is below normal however am clocked 2.8c @ 3.5ghz

well yea but it's the voltage that CREATES the heat. hence people saying that vcore kills the cpu. but everyone is right, if you can keep your cpu cool, you can go as far as your psu will allow. i have a friend that went to 2.26V on his barton. personally i don't touch 1.9V. i don't have enough money to risk that kind of a thing.

BTW... nice temps. way to make me jealous! jerk face! :D

Its not realy the heat that kills a CPU, its electrons jumping the little gaps in the proc. Once an e- jumps it preatymuch burns in a bridge and others follow hense the proc is dead. Both heat and voltage increase the probility of this. If you raise the voltagem, the diffrence above one of these gaps is going to increase, and the electron will be more likley to jump the gap. Heat also has an effect of 'loosing' everything up. Of corse if your proce gets up to 90c its just gonna send out pumes of smoke and you can screw the whole electron theorie.

As for raising the vcore, you can preaty much send it up to 2v and have it last a minimum of three years. After thoes three years, youll be able to buy a faster proc for like 50$. It will barley set you back for the preformance increase you recive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 47% profit margin? Wtf!! I know companies are in business to make money but come on man. I know for a fact I'll never own one of these.
    • Most AI-powered mainframe migration vendors expected to fail by 2030, Gartner warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels You may have read that many companies still run code written in ancient programming languages like COBOL and pay a handsome sum for those who can maintain that code. Well, it looks like this area of the tech world could be the scene of an AI bubble. It turns out that there are mainframe exit vendors, helping companies move their legacy mainframe systems to modern cloud environments or servers such as Microsoft Azure and AWS, using generative AI tooling. Unfortunately, 75% of these vendors are now expected to pivot or cease operations as market realities take hold by 2030. Alessandro Galimberti from Gartner said: Some of the companies in the mainframe exit market are IBM, 21CS, BMC, Broadcom, Rocket Software, DXC, GTSG, and Kyndryl. The reasons some of these firms are expected to quit the market are a reset of market expectations and a decline in demand for one-size-fits-all migration solutions. The reset in expectations is likely to be driven by cost overruns and threats to business, and the potential occurrence of critical failures within businesses as a result of bad transition implementations. These insights from Gartner are pretty interesting because it’s a specific area of the market where doubt is being cast on generative AI. Many people have cast doubt on whether AI companies will successfully justify the massive amounts spent on GenAI to date, and this data from Gartner suggests the road could be rocky for GenAI.
    • Heaven forbid they lose pennies from their Trillions! Like always, the consumer pays the most. Why is Tim Cooks even talking.....shouldn't he be packing up his office??
    • If you have the budget...! Some solo or indies just want to either learn or start their game and aren't in a capacity to pay salaries or to contractors... Get real.
    • Source and more 35 years old?! And if my maths is mathing, that means she was around 10 when The Ring came out?! Damn...scariest 10 year old I think I've ever seen. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      neufuse
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!