• 0

(Resolved) [Access] Access Database opening in design mode


Question

I have an Access Database that everyone was able to access last month. I then had an issue where one user was only getting what appears to be design mode, on the same PC she is able to login as another account and the database runs properly. Myself and another tested and we are not able to get it to run either. The user is on an XP machine x32 and I am on Windows 7 x64. there are still some users able to access this with no issue the last I checked. I tried copying the ODBC connections from the working user to me but it still opens the same way. Would appreciate any guidance as to what would cause this. The last time it was accessible was 7/30/2012.

Thanks,

Issue resolved, turns out there were two versions of the database a local and a lan. The LAN version was not the right version.

Edited by littleneutrino

12 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Other people can use the file just fine, (the file is hosted on a server that lots of people can access. there are currently 2 users that are unable to open it normally

  • 0

Ok, being that it is happening on certain profiles on certain machines but not on other profiles on the same machine, have you looked at the individual user settings like macro settings (like I mentioned before)?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I don't know, I haven't checked what changed in previous sockets. I agree that the 1156-1155-1151 succession was suspicious, with a reduction in pin count every time. Intel could do a better job of pre-allocating pins for future use. Another hypothesis is that the internal layout of their CPUs change, like the I/O is moved from one place to another on the chip, and they need to reorganize pins rather than having circuitry go into spaghetti mode to remain compatible. I agree that if AMD is able to maintain compatibility, Intel should be able to do the same, at least by reserving pins for future use and then using those pins when a need for them arises. However, I wouldn't say that AMD's products are entirely better. Intel's I/O now slightly edges out thanks to having double the bandwidth to the chipset and dedicated Thunderbolt lanes to the CPU. It seems that they could widen their lead with the next platform. NVMe SSDs have increased the need for PCIe lanes significantly, and AM5 has been pretty underwhelming in that regard, especially because the chipset connection is so narrow and gets saturated with just 1 gen 4 SSD, leaving the other chipset connectivity (Ethernet, Wi-Fi, audio, etc) to hope for any remaining bandwidth. Otherwise motherboard manufacturers could also make more x2 M.2 slots, those would be fast enough at gen 5 speeds and possibly at gen 4 speeds too.
    • Exactly, the E-cores actually give you good performance for what they offer, it's no surprise that Intel is doubling down on more E-cores instead of more P-cores. The LP-cores are good for when you're system is just sitting there idle and waiting to be used. Every core has it's place tbh, it's just up to Intel to and MS to work to get the scheduler right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      korostelev earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rozermack875 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      oneworldtechnologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      matthiew went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Enthusiast
      Motoman26 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      675
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      264
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      184
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      177
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      140
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!