Does your bank support two-factor authentication?


Does your bank support two-factor authentication?  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Does your bank support two-factor authentication?

    • Yes
      33
    • No
      4
    • No But I wish they did.
      5


Recommended Posts

I recently wrote to my bank asking for two-factor authentication. I would be happy if my bank would text my cell phone with a pin that I would use in combination with my login name and password. Apparently it got sent to the IT guy. So my question is, does your bank support two-factor authentication?

The 3 different types of authentication goes as followed

1) Something you know (Like a password, or something you type off the screen)

2) Something you have (Like a cell phone or some sort of device which generates a pin, which someone would have to have in their physical possession to log into your account)

3) Something you are (This would be where you would use a finger print reader, or have your eyes scanned)

My bank has a lame two factor authentication. The second part asks for 3 words random letters from the secret key. Dont like the idea of authenticators. I would rather prefer them texting me a unique key each time I login.

I'm confused, are they asking for something you know or for something have? At the moment it sounds like just 1 factor, just something you know.

Probably password then the next step is asking for three letters from an answer you have already provided them

So password

Give letter 1, 3, 5 of your secret answer

Authorised.

That is prob for online banking though.

My bank uses two-factor authentication for setting up new payees and changes to account settings but not for general online banking (transfers between accounts, viewing statements, etc). It's a decent compromise between practicality and security.

I would prefer banks used mobile more. In particular I would like to be notified every time money is withdrawn from an ATM or purchases above a certain amount are made. I've got an Italian friend and her bank sends her texts when a certain amount is withdrawn, which I think all banks should be required to offer.

I know that is an option with some accounts but not all which I agree should be required "theyarecomingforyou"

And same, setting up payees etc they require a automated telephone call with a pin and all sorts for bank of scotland

My bank has a lame two factor authentication. The second part asks for 3 words random letters from the secret key. Dont like the idea of authenticators. I would rather prefer them texting me a unique key each time I login.

That's what my bank does when I do an online sign in as well.

My bank does give you the option of alerts via email. But only a select few alerts. It does not let you set a dollar amount to be notified about.

For instance, I would like to sent an alert when a check / credit or debit is made on my account for $200 or more.

but what it will alert people about is if their tax refund arrived in their account :angry:

Hmm well I did just see where I can get an alert if my account falls below X amount of dollars. So I just turned that on and set an amount. I guess that's handy.

A physical key card of 72 6-digit codes for login, changing settings and some third-party online services, first 3 digits for confirmation of payments.

Not enough entropy for my liking. Also - three "strikes" and one has to go to the bank in person to unlock online banking again - which I've also had to do once due to taking the wrong key card and then wondering why it didn't accept the thing.

I bank in the UK with NatWest, they use 2 factor authentication in a sensible way. Barclays require you to use a physical chip and pin device every time you login, whilst secure it rapidly becomes a pain in the neck when you're out and about and need access - like that emergency purchase when you're at the office. NatWest only require you to use it when paying someone for the first time or when transferring large sums of money. I can cope with that!

  • Like 1

One of my banks only allow 6-8 character passwords, and I don't believe they even allow special characters . . .

My bank has a limit of 17 characters. The fact they have a limit at all is scary!

Mine uses two forms of something I know. A UN/PW and then a PIN, also if it's an IP address I've never logged in with they as a Secret Question. Pretty good security without getting in my way very much.

One of my banks only allow 6-8 character passwords, and I don't believe they even allow special characters . . .

Capital One is this way...I really wish they would allow me to use a stronger password.

I'm confused, are they asking for something you know or for something have? At the moment it sounds like just 1 factor, just something you know.

CW-88 explained it best, quote below:

Probably password then the next step is asking for three letters from an answer you have already provided them

So password

Give letter 1, 3, 5 of your secret answer

Authorised.

That is prob for online banking though.

I think banks need to up their game. The likes of Steam and Blizzard are providing better login security but I guess no bank has had their online security breached as bad as both these outlets.

My bank requires the following when logging in online.

Access ID: A number provided by the bank.

PIN: A password that the user makes up for themselves.

Authentication Key: A random 6 digit number generated by a key generator supplied by the bank. Number is good for about 30 seconds before a new number has to be generated.

Not sure what else they could do. :)

My bank (Locally owned), has sort of a two factor authentication they think will be best. You log in - and it cross checks against your IP, if it changes, then it sends you a 'pin' to authenticate yourself either to your cell or email on file. Once you enter the pin, you are good to go with just your regular password. Before that, they had a picture that you were supposed to recognize and if you did, answered the question about it and then your password.

Personally, would LOVE to see more support on sites for Yubikey authentication - super easy to do and quite secure.

Personally, would LOVE to see more support on sites for Yubikey authentication - super easy to do and quite secure.

Ya, I bought one when it first came out. I just don't know where it is...hmmm.

my UK bank asks for a 10 digit number and then it'll ask me for 3 random characters from my set password and then for a random 3 digits of my cards pin number.

Canadian credit union asks for member number then it'll ask me for the answer to a security question. If I answer right it'll take me to a password page but it also displays 2 images I chose during signup to verify that the page is "true". Only if the images match should I enter my password.

Overall both institutions seem pretty secure. Never had any issues with fraud with either (touch wood)

I also have an account with another canadian bank and they just ask for debit card number and a password. If it detects that i'm logging on from an odd location or IP it'll ask a security question too.

my UK bank asks for a 10 digit number and then it'll ask me for 3 random characters from my set password and then for a random 3 digits of my cards pin number.

Canadian credit union asks for member number then it'll ask me for the answer to a security question. If I answer right it'll take me to a password page but it also displays 2 images I chose during signup to verify that the page is "true". Only if the images match should I enter my password.

Those "images" were defunked a long time a lot. The phishing sites would actually grab the "images" from the legit site and show them to you on the fake one."

HSBC in the UK are ahead with this type of thing.

You have your log on ID and a password.

Then you have to input the six digits from their "Secure Key" device.

6a01053620481c970b015390bf1a2e970b-500wi

When turning on the device, it asks for a 4-digit pin number, then randomly generates a 6-digit number of which you have to input to get into the bank.

Hassle for when I am elsewhere, but I don't remember my log on ID so only log on at home where the secure key is.

Here's their link with a demo.

It's not strictly two-factor, but it's as secure as it gets.

You enter your card number on the site (not a credit card, number is never used to pay), then put your card in a portable reader thingy and use that to scan an optical code on your PC display. Select what you want to do (logon/sign/buy), enter your PIN and then you get a response to enter on the web page.

To sign transactions or to buy stuff you not only have to enter your PIN number on the reader but also the (total) amount. Pretty much secures you against malicious spoofing of your transactions. I consider this to be extremely safe and you don't have to remember any passwords.

  • 1 month later...

Mine uses a random generated 8 digit password which is send to the registered mobile to authenticate any online payment.

The bank also has 3 passwords.

1) Login

2) Transaction

3) Profile

Login password needs to be changed every 2 months.

So to complete any online payment, I have to know 3 passwords. Login, Transaction and the password sent to mobile which is valid for 1 hr.

Pretty decent.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
    • Last year I bought the 2TB variant for $114 on Amazon. That's crazy that the 1TB is now 67% more expensive for half the storage, even with the newer T9 already on the market. And that's considered a good deal.
    • You can disable all non needed features from Brave. There is also Brave Origin which removes them entirely and it is free for Linux.
    • I wish I could use Brave but the tab suspension feature is horrible. It doesn't suspend them like Edge does. Even after 2h open with 70+ tabs (same as Edge), it has 2GB more consumption than Edge for no reason.
    • TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 by Razvan Serea TeamViewer is the fast, simple and friendly solution for remote access over the Internet - all applications in one single, very affordable module. Remote control of computers over the Internet, Instantly take control over a computer anywhere on the Internet, even through firewalls. No installation required, just use it fast and secure. Training, sales and teamwork, TeamViewer can also be used to present your desktop to a partner on the Internet. Show and share your software, PowerPoint presentations etc. File transfer, chat and more, Share your files, chat, switch the direction during a teamwork session, and a lot more is included in TeamViewer. TeamViewer key features: Cross-platform remote access (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, IoT) Attended and unattended remote control Secure file transfer between devices Remote printing to local printers Multi-monitor support with easy switching Wake-on-LAN for sleeping devices Session links for quick connections (no password sharing) Web client access (no installation needed) End-to-end encryption (AES-256) Two-factor authentication and access controls AI-powered session insights and reporting Mass deployment and device management tools Customizable allow/block lists for security Command line and script execution remotely Performance monitoring and analytics dashboards TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 changelog: Improvements Permissions inheritance has been improved, increasing reliability when permissions are assigned to user group managers. Bugfixes Fixed a bug where 'Show details' button was not showing up on command bar upon selection of a device group. Fixed a bug which was causing the legacy groups to disappear when applying hide offline filter in basic view. Fixed a bug where devices were loading infinitely after login. Fixed a bug which was causing crash in application. Download: TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 | 32-bit | Portable | Mac | ~70.0 MB (Free for personal use) View: TeamViewer Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      135
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!