• 0

Help Creating a Patch


Question

Hi! I found some info in this forum about patching a program but not a complete guide.. Lets say i have 1.exe .This exe contains some textboxes.. i want to create a second exe (2.exe) which will be able to patch all or one value of textbox in the 1.exe.

As i said i found in this forum info about creating the 2.exe BUT in an exe which was build with microsoft studio 2010(vb.net or c# etc..) i cannot find strings using w32dasm.. My plan was to open w32dasm and find the address of the string that i want to replace and then patch the address with 2.exe...

So HOW to find the address of a string/textbox.text(value) of an exe?

i can find the strings of an exe which was build by vb6 but not from an exe which was build by vb.net 2010..

Please help me..

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1107347-help-creating-a-patch/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I believe what you are referring to is program disassembly, not patching. Generally, a patch is generated using 'diff' and applied using 'patch', a process commonly known as patching. The assumption with patch is usually that you have access to the full source code of the program, which it sounds like you do not. It does not actually help you modify the program in any way.

As for disassembly, it sounds like you don't quite have a firm grasp on the basic concepts yet. I recommend that you read this primer on x86 program disassembly. While it won't specifically answer your question, it should at least give you a better understanding of how programs work and how to find program elements in assembly.

Finally, I believe that your specific problem may have something to do with the utility you are using. While w32dasm has been an excellent win32 disassembler for many years, it is no longer supported (since the last release in 2003) and has a few limitations. The most prominent of which are that it cannot disassemble 64-bit executables and does not work with managed languages, such as .NET and Java. Most likely the reason you can disassemble VB6 executables but not VB.NET 2010 is because after Visual Basic 6, Microsoft transitioned it to use the .NET Framework, hence the name.

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 20:06, articuno1au said:

Why not just recompile the application with the changes you want?

because i want the user to be able to do it.. i make a project for someone.. he wants to "generate" an exe with his own specifications..

so the 1.exe will be the program with NULL values in textboxes.. and the 2.exe will be "patcher"..it will update the textboxe's values of 1.exe.. then he can use the 1.exe with these values.. you understand me? Thanks!

  • 0

Perhaps consider changing the source files rather than the exe?

Generate an exe to read your source files, find the specific classes, open them in a stream reader and replace the text you need changed.

eg: Textbox1.Text = Null; -> Textbox1.Text = "Whatever";

Then the user himself merely has to recompile.

I don't know that what you want done is possible in .net. It might be, but I don't know of a way..

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 20:09, nouser said:

because i want the user to be able to do it.. i make a project for someone.. he wants to "generate" an exe with his own specifications..

so the 1.exe will be the program with NULL values in textboxes.. and the 2.exe will be "patcher"..it will update the textboxe's values of 1.exe.. then he can use the 1.exe with these values.. you understand me? Thanks!

Are you telling me that you want your user to learn how to use a disassembler?! I suspect not, but I'm having a little trouble figuring out exactly what you are planning on using the disassembler for now.

If you want the user to be able to generate a customized executable so that it can be distributed with user-defined settings and no external configuration file, you are probably going about it the wrong way. It would probably be easiest to generate a configuration file (such as XML or INI) when the user saves his settings. It would be easiest to have the user simply distribute this file with the executable so his defaults can easily be loaded. If everything must be contained in a single executable, the easiest option is to use an installer, such as NSIS, to package both together and extract them when executed. Another option, which I have looked into but never actually implemented, would be to embed the configuration file into a copy of your executable as a resource, then instruct the program to look for the resource every time it is run.

  • 0

Let me explain you.first of all thanks everyone!!

I work to someone online and make a program for him. He will sell the program to MANY people.. Someone will HAVE to buy 2 programs because the guy im working to, do not want to compile the project all the time and he wants his customers to be able to MAKE THEIR EXE WITH THEIR VALUES :)

so someone will buy these 2 programs.

1.exe is the standard program with NULL VALUES

2.exe is a program which will run and have 3 textboxes. Customer will add in first textfiled his Phone,second textfield his Email and third textfield his address. The he will click CREATE EXE button and the 1.exe will get these values to HIS 3 textfields..now everytime someone openes 1.exe it will contain these values and it will not be null..

:)

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 20:13, n_K said:

www.clickteam.com

Use install creator or patch maker, loads of companies use them to make game patches and it does what you're after (differential patching)

That is AWESOME! I have never seen something like that before, but I really like it.

I'm not sure it solves the problem at hand though. On second thought, maybe it could be used for this purpose, I'm just not sure exactly how yet.

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 20:27, nouser said:

Let me explain you.first of all thanks everyone!!

I work to someone online and make a program for him. He will sell the program to MANY people.. Someone will HAVE to buy 2 programs because the guy im working to, do not want to compile the project all the time and he wants his customers to be able to MAKE THEIR EXE WITH THEIR VALUES :)

so someone will buy these 2 programs.

1.exe is the standard program with NULL VALUES

2.exe is a program which will run and have 3 textboxes. Customer will add in first textfiled his Phone,second textfield his Email and third textfield his address. The he will click CREATE EXE button and the 1.exe will get these values to HIS 3 textfields..now everytime someone openes 1.exe it will contain these values and it will not be null..

:)

How are the values saved by 1.exe?

Can you just create an XML config file with your settings in it?

Sorry, this just seems like reinventing the wheel to me >.<

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 20:40, n_K said:

Yeah just use XML or INI or SQL or anything like that, you can even embed it into the EXE (if needed) and just extract it when the program runs (have a header like #####SECRETHEADER) to look for and get the data after that.

Exactly what I was going to suggest next. You beat me to it. Needless to say, I agree.

  • 0

You can definitely embed resources into the exe.

The issue is that the guy compiling it would have to create the config file each time he compiled it.

You could even use internal variables and just have the guy edit them in.. Probably easier if you are taking that approach..

  • 0

i need these resources to be editable by the user via an other exe... :/

i have seen what i am asking in trojans in the looong past. user could put his ip/dns and create an exe..i think it was being done with patching.. i was too young..i just remember that..i want something similar..basically i want that thing but not for trojan lol thanks

  • 0


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ArrayOfSettings xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<Settings>
<ServerPath>C:\Server\whatever.exe</ServerPath>
<PortNumber>8420</PortNumber>
<PortCheck>true</PortCheck>
<AutoStart>true</AutoStart>
</Settings>
</ArrayOfSettings>[/CODE]

That's how I do it. Simply create a structure (or class) containing your settings.

[CODE]
public struct Settings
{
public string ServerPath;
public int PortNumber;
public bool PortCheck;
public bool AutoStart;
}
[/CODE]

Then:

[CODE]
var xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof (Settings[]));
var sWriter = new StreamWriter(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory + "Settings.xml", false);
xmlSerializer.Serialize(sWriter, settingsArray);
sWriter.Close();
[/CODE]

to write the settings out of the program, or the deserialize method to read the settings into the program.

This way the .exe is distributed all on it's own, but your program can create a settings file to work off of.

If the user needs to make changes, they can simply make a change in the .xml file (or in your application, or in a separate application that only makes the file etc etc etc)

You can embed this file as a resource and read it out of the resource instead of as a filesystem request. Then you just make the executable take the values and save them.. Might defy the point though >.>

EDIT::

I consulted with an expert on the subject, and he said it's possible, but it's a butt load of pain to do. He said that once values are changed in the initial compile, it becomes next to impossible to find in C++, and only marginally better in CLI language.

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 20:55, articuno1au said:


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ArrayOfSettings xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<Settings>
<ServerPath>C:\Server\whatever.exe</ServerPath>
<PortNumber>8420</PortNumber>
<PortCheck>true</PortCheck>
<AutoStart>true</AutoStart>
</Settings>
</ArrayOfSettings>[/CODE]

That's how I do it. Simply create a structure (or class) containing your settings.

[CODE]
public struct Settings
{
public string ServerPath;
public int PortNumber;
public bool PortCheck;
public bool AutoStart;
}
[/CODE]

Then:

[CODE]
var xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof (Settings[]));
var sWriter = new StreamWriter(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory + "Settings.xml", false);
xmlSerializer.Serialize(sWriter, settingsArray);
sWriter.Close();
[/CODE]

to write the settings out of the program, or the deserialize method to read the settings into the program.

This way the .exe is distributed all on it's own, but your program can create a settings file to work off of.

If the user needs to make changes, they can simply make a change in the .xml file (or in your application, or in a separate application that only makes the file etc etc etc)

You can embed this file as a resource and read it out of the resource instead of as a filesystem request. Then you just make the executable take the values and save them.. Might defy the point though >.>

EDIT::

I consulted with an expert on the subject, and he said it's possible, but it's a butt load of pain to do. He said that once values are changed in the initial compile, it becomes next to impossible to find in C++, and only marginally better in CLI language.

thanks for your reply,that way is not standalone..the xml file HAS to be in the same folder with the exe..right? correct me if im wrong

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 21:06, nouser said:

thanks for your reply,that way is not standalone..the xml file HAS to be in the same folder with the exe..right? correct me if im wrong

Yep.

Once you embed a resource, you can't access it easily as a user.

Hell, you can't access it easily outside of the application even if you wrote the application.

There really isn't a good way to do this :\

Best bet sounds like settings the values pre compile and just using constants >.>

  • 0

check here: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1021544-help-me-making-a-patch-vbnet/

this guy asks how to patch an exe.. so this is enough heplfull..also someone else there posted a project about patching an other exe.. BUT in my exe i cannot find what is the offset address that need to be patched.. a vb6 exe shows the strings in w32dams.. vb.net exe file wont show the strings in w32dasm so i cannot get the address.. i tried other than w32dasm(as you mentioned w32dasm is old..) but still i cannot see the strings in order to get their address and change them...

  • 0

Compile with null values.

Compile a new exe with a different value.

Compare the two exes in binary (Google it), that should identify where the variables are stored in CLI.

Write a binary editor to insert the values.

Waste 5+ hours perfecting the above >.>

  • 0
  On 22/09/2012 at 21:30, articuno1au said:

Compile with null values.

Compile a new exe with a different value.

Compare the two exes in binary (Google it), that should identify where the variables are stored in CLI.

Write a binary editor to insert the values.

Waste 5+ hours perfecting the above >.>

in the past i used to patch some exe's from other people to change the program title(window title) just for fun.. the thing is that from old exes you could be able to read the string's offset address using w32dasm..but with new exes i cannot do that.. thats what im looking for..a program that will give me the address of the strings!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Really? Do you want it spelled out? Ok: It was a funsies way to say that we can confidently asume that their update servers were shut down years ago already, and no updates have been developed or delivered to any LG phone in years, since, to begin, LG wasn't too well known for their software support.
    • Good afternoon, I have a customer who purchased a Dell laptop last year. One of the latest Inspirons. they are older so it can be a bit hard to see things on the screen. They are using Windows 11 Home 23H2, I have not upgraded them yet to 24H2. What I did was changed the scaling to 150% and that automatically made all the icons on desktop bigger and using in Chrome webpage elements are bigger etc. The thing is I overlooked the Taskbar and the icons most notably hidden within the arrow pointing up. I though by changing to 150% the scaling even the taskbar would get bigger. Again I don't know how I missed seeing that. Is this something that can be fixed? One other thing is I notice in File Explorer things are also small and not larger after the change. Can this be fixed as well?   Thank You.
    • Apple still has two unannounced features for iOS 26 by Hamid Ganji Apple held its WWDC25 event this month to unveil a slew of AI features and its new design for operating systems, known as Liquid Glass. While iOS 26 currently has no shortage of features, the iPhone maker might still have some features under wraps that didn’t make a debut at this month’s WWDC. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman writes in his weekly Power On newsletter that Apple didn’t announce two iOS 26 features at the WWDC event. The first feature is a live translation of conversations via AirPods, and the latter is the ability to sync your wireless network login information across devices at a hotel or gym. Even though these features were already tipped to arrive in iOS 26, Apple held them from the event, presumably because they’re still not ready to ship. Apple appears to have learned from its experience with Apple Intelligence and aims to break the habit of unveiling new features before they are ready for release. The Live Translation on iOS 26 is currently integrated with popular apps like Messages, FaceTime, and Phone to help users break language barriers and communicate in different languages. The feature is now under development for AirPods, allowing users to hear real-time speech translations. Moreover, the WiFi syncing feature allows you to sync your sign-in information across your entire Apple ecosystem, enabling you to connect to a public WiFi network with ease. This would eliminate the need to sign into a WiFi network separately on each device. While these features haven’t arrived in iOS 26 yet, they’re more likely to be released later this year, in October or December.
    • Intel Level L4 cache has been around for a long time, so AMD Zen 3D Cache is a copy of Intel L4 cache that was introduced with Broadwell i7-5775c, which had 128mb of Level L4 cache. Secondly, Zen 6 is not faster in single-threaded performance than 13900k/14900k. 285k is something new Intel is trying, basically showing us that chiplet design does not work for gaming, just like AMD design does not work for gaming. Throwing more cores at it and having L4 cache won't fix the issue, and that is frame dip and stuttering caused by a very stupid design decision to keep the memory controller outside the compute tile. Might as well put a memory controller by bringing back a south bridge chip. lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Community Regular
      Primey_ went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Reacting Well
      Gromvar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Dedicated
      BreakingBenjamin earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Hartej earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      TsunadeMama earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      183
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      168
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      97
    5. 5
      Som
      96
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!