• 0

Help Creating a Patch


Question

Hi! I found some info in this forum about patching a program but not a complete guide.. Lets say i have 1.exe .This exe contains some textboxes.. i want to create a second exe (2.exe) which will be able to patch all or one value of textbox in the 1.exe.

As i said i found in this forum info about creating the 2.exe BUT in an exe which was build with microsoft studio 2010(vb.net or c# etc..) i cannot find strings using w32dasm.. My plan was to open w32dasm and find the address of the string that i want to replace and then patch the address with 2.exe...

So HOW to find the address of a string/textbox.text(value) of an exe?

i can find the strings of an exe which was build by vb6 but not from an exe which was build by vb.net 2010..

Please help me..

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1107347-help-creating-a-patch/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I believe what you are referring to is program disassembly, not patching. Generally, a patch is generated using 'diff' and applied using 'patch', a process commonly known as patching. The assumption with patch is usually that you have access to the full source code of the program, which it sounds like you do not. It does not actually help you modify the program in any way.

As for disassembly, it sounds like you don't quite have a firm grasp on the basic concepts yet. I recommend that you read this primer on x86 program disassembly. While it won't specifically answer your question, it should at least give you a better understanding of how programs work and how to find program elements in assembly.

Finally, I believe that your specific problem may have something to do with the utility you are using. While w32dasm has been an excellent win32 disassembler for many years, it is no longer supported (since the last release in 2003) and has a few limitations. The most prominent of which are that it cannot disassemble 64-bit executables and does not work with managed languages, such as .NET and Java. Most likely the reason you can disassemble VB6 executables but not VB.NET 2010 is because after Visual Basic 6, Microsoft transitioned it to use the .NET Framework, hence the name.

  • 0

Why not just recompile the application with the changes you want?

because i want the user to be able to do it.. i make a project for someone.. he wants to "generate" an exe with his own specifications..

so the 1.exe will be the program with NULL values in textboxes.. and the 2.exe will be "patcher"..it will update the textboxe's values of 1.exe.. then he can use the 1.exe with these values.. you understand me? Thanks!

  • 0

Perhaps consider changing the source files rather than the exe?

Generate an exe to read your source files, find the specific classes, open them in a stream reader and replace the text you need changed.

eg: Textbox1.Text = Null; -> Textbox1.Text = "Whatever";

Then the user himself merely has to recompile.

I don't know that what you want done is possible in .net. It might be, but I don't know of a way..

  • 0

because i want the user to be able to do it.. i make a project for someone.. he wants to "generate" an exe with his own specifications..

so the 1.exe will be the program with NULL values in textboxes.. and the 2.exe will be "patcher"..it will update the textboxe's values of 1.exe.. then he can use the 1.exe with these values.. you understand me? Thanks!

Are you telling me that you want your user to learn how to use a disassembler?! I suspect not, but I'm having a little trouble figuring out exactly what you are planning on using the disassembler for now.

If you want the user to be able to generate a customized executable so that it can be distributed with user-defined settings and no external configuration file, you are probably going about it the wrong way. It would probably be easiest to generate a configuration file (such as XML or INI) when the user saves his settings. It would be easiest to have the user simply distribute this file with the executable so his defaults can easily be loaded. If everything must be contained in a single executable, the easiest option is to use an installer, such as NSIS, to package both together and extract them when executed. Another option, which I have looked into but never actually implemented, would be to embed the configuration file into a copy of your executable as a resource, then instruct the program to look for the resource every time it is run.

  • 0

Let me explain you.first of all thanks everyone!!

I work to someone online and make a program for him. He will sell the program to MANY people.. Someone will HAVE to buy 2 programs because the guy im working to, do not want to compile the project all the time and he wants his customers to be able to MAKE THEIR EXE WITH THEIR VALUES :)

so someone will buy these 2 programs.

1.exe is the standard program with NULL VALUES

2.exe is a program which will run and have 3 textboxes. Customer will add in first textfiled his Phone,second textfield his Email and third textfield his address. The he will click CREATE EXE button and the 1.exe will get these values to HIS 3 textfields..now everytime someone openes 1.exe it will contain these values and it will not be null..

:)

  • 0

www.clickteam.com

Use install creator or patch maker, loads of companies use them to make game patches and it does what you're after (differential patching)

That is AWESOME! I have never seen something like that before, but I really like it.

I'm not sure it solves the problem at hand though. On second thought, maybe it could be used for this purpose, I'm just not sure exactly how yet.

  • 0

Let me explain you.first of all thanks everyone!!

I work to someone online and make a program for him. He will sell the program to MANY people.. Someone will HAVE to buy 2 programs because the guy im working to, do not want to compile the project all the time and he wants his customers to be able to MAKE THEIR EXE WITH THEIR VALUES :)

so someone will buy these 2 programs.

1.exe is the standard program with NULL VALUES

2.exe is a program which will run and have 3 textboxes. Customer will add in first textfiled his Phone,second textfield his Email and third textfield his address. The he will click CREATE EXE button and the 1.exe will get these values to HIS 3 textfields..now everytime someone openes 1.exe it will contain these values and it will not be null..

:)

How are the values saved by 1.exe?

Can you just create an XML config file with your settings in it?

Sorry, this just seems like reinventing the wheel to me >.<

  • 0

Yeah just use XML or INI or SQL or anything like that, you can even embed it into the EXE (if needed) and just extract it when the program runs (have a header like #####SECRETHEADER) to look for and get the data after that.

Exactly what I was going to suggest next. You beat me to it. Needless to say, I agree.

  • 0

You can definitely embed resources into the exe.

The issue is that the guy compiling it would have to create the config file each time he compiled it.

You could even use internal variables and just have the guy edit them in.. Probably easier if you are taking that approach..

  • 0

i need these resources to be editable by the user via an other exe... :/

i have seen what i am asking in trojans in the looong past. user could put his ip/dns and create an exe..i think it was being done with patching.. i was too young..i just remember that..i want something similar..basically i want that thing but not for trojan lol thanks

  • 0


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ArrayOfSettings xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<Settings>
<ServerPath>C:\Server\whatever.exe</ServerPath>
<PortNumber>8420</PortNumber>
<PortCheck>true</PortCheck>
<AutoStart>true</AutoStart>
</Settings>
</ArrayOfSettings>[/CODE]

That's how I do it. Simply create a structure (or class) containing your settings.

[CODE]
public struct Settings
{
public string ServerPath;
public int PortNumber;
public bool PortCheck;
public bool AutoStart;
}
[/CODE]

Then:

[CODE]
var xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof (Settings[]));
var sWriter = new StreamWriter(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory + "Settings.xml", false);
xmlSerializer.Serialize(sWriter, settingsArray);
sWriter.Close();
[/CODE]

to write the settings out of the program, or the deserialize method to read the settings into the program.

This way the .exe is distributed all on it's own, but your program can create a settings file to work off of.

If the user needs to make changes, they can simply make a change in the .xml file (or in your application, or in a separate application that only makes the file etc etc etc)

You can embed this file as a resource and read it out of the resource instead of as a filesystem request. Then you just make the executable take the values and save them.. Might defy the point though >.>

EDIT::

I consulted with an expert on the subject, and he said it's possible, but it's a butt load of pain to do. He said that once values are changed in the initial compile, it becomes next to impossible to find in C++, and only marginally better in CLI language.

  • 0


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ArrayOfSettings xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<Settings>
<ServerPath>C:\Server\whatever.exe</ServerPath>
<PortNumber>8420</PortNumber>
<PortCheck>true</PortCheck>
<AutoStart>true</AutoStart>
</Settings>
</ArrayOfSettings>[/CODE]

That's how I do it. Simply create a structure (or class) containing your settings.

[CODE]
public struct Settings
{
public string ServerPath;
public int PortNumber;
public bool PortCheck;
public bool AutoStart;
}
[/CODE]

Then:

[CODE]
var xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof (Settings[]));
var sWriter = new StreamWriter(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory + "Settings.xml", false);
xmlSerializer.Serialize(sWriter, settingsArray);
sWriter.Close();
[/CODE]

to write the settings out of the program, or the deserialize method to read the settings into the program.

This way the .exe is distributed all on it's own, but your program can create a settings file to work off of.

If the user needs to make changes, they can simply make a change in the .xml file (or in your application, or in a separate application that only makes the file etc etc etc)

You can embed this file as a resource and read it out of the resource instead of as a filesystem request. Then you just make the executable take the values and save them.. Might defy the point though >.>

EDIT::

I consulted with an expert on the subject, and he said it's possible, but it's a butt load of pain to do. He said that once values are changed in the initial compile, it becomes next to impossible to find in C++, and only marginally better in CLI language.

thanks for your reply,that way is not standalone..the xml file HAS to be in the same folder with the exe..right? correct me if im wrong

  • 0

thanks for your reply,that way is not standalone..the xml file HAS to be in the same folder with the exe..right? correct me if im wrong

Yep.

Once you embed a resource, you can't access it easily as a user.

Hell, you can't access it easily outside of the application even if you wrote the application.

There really isn't a good way to do this :\

Best bet sounds like settings the values pre compile and just using constants >.>

  • 0

check here: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1021544-help-me-making-a-patch-vbnet/

this guy asks how to patch an exe.. so this is enough heplfull..also someone else there posted a project about patching an other exe.. BUT in my exe i cannot find what is the offset address that need to be patched.. a vb6 exe shows the strings in w32dams.. vb.net exe file wont show the strings in w32dasm so i cannot get the address.. i tried other than w32dasm(as you mentioned w32dasm is old..) but still i cannot see the strings in order to get their address and change them...

  • 0

Compile with null values.

Compile a new exe with a different value.

Compare the two exes in binary (Google it), that should identify where the variables are stored in CLI.

Write a binary editor to insert the values.

Waste 5+ hours perfecting the above >.>

  • 0

Compile with null values.

Compile a new exe with a different value.

Compare the two exes in binary (Google it), that should identify where the variables are stored in CLI.

Write a binary editor to insert the values.

Waste 5+ hours perfecting the above >.>

in the past i used to patch some exe's from other people to change the program title(window title) just for fun.. the thing is that from old exes you could be able to read the string's offset address using w32dasm..but with new exes i cannot do that.. thats what im looking for..a program that will give me the address of the strings!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Still 3x what it should cost. So, it seems the trick is to increase price by 6x so that a reduction in price back to 4x looks like a steal. "You savvy shoppers win again!" I'm glad I'm not in a desperate spot to actually even need this overpriced crap. Hopefully, it comes back down by the time for when (or if) I ever do.
    • Although AI is great and has it's use cases they likely have massively overhyped it and it has not delivered as per their expectations. I fully expect them to start saying the same things again when it does get to a certain level of intelligence!
    • Microsoft wants to end printer driver headaches with Windows Ready Print by Usama Jawad A few days ago, Microsoft released Windows 11 Experimental build 26300.8553, bringing a ton of enhancements such as Start menu customization, search improvements, Taskbar polish, and other minor UI tweaks. Another relatively major enhancement snuck deep within the change log was related to upgrades to the Windows printing experience. Now, Microsoft has shared more details about these benefits. For starters, Microsoft has renamed its Modern Print Platform to Windows Ready Print. The company believes that this name highlights its shift in strategy, which now focuses on modernizing, securing, and streamlining the printing experience for Windows devices. Some of the upgrades present in Windows Ready Print have already been seeded to customers and partners. This includes ending support for third-party printer drivers via Windows Update and transitioning towards the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) and the native Windows IPP printer driver. In line with these changes, new printer installations will default to Windows Ready Print on eligible devices starting from July 2026. However, Microsoft recognizes that not all environments will be able to migrate to this platform immediately, so it will allow users to choose between installing the printer via Windows Ready Print or the traditional OEM process. Users will be able to toggle this configuration through Settings > Bluetooth & Devices > Printers & Scanners > Printer preferences. This control applies only to new printer installations, and its functionality can also be modified via Group Policy as follows: Launch Group Policy Editor Navigate to Local Computer Policy -> Administrative Templates -> Printers Find and select 'Configure Windows Ready Print driver ranking' -> double click to open it Select 'Enabled' (if you wish to enable Windows Ready Print driver selection) or 'Disabled' (if you wish to explicitly disable Windows Ready Print driver selection). Select Apply Select OK Similarly, if you set up Windows protected print mode through the same setting in Windows 11, it will also default to using Windows Ready Print exclusively. Microsoft hopes that these improvements will help eradicate dependency on OEM-specific driver installation processes and simplify printer installations. We'll likely find out more about other tangible benefits in the coming months.
    • Hey what's about the proton vpn firefox extension ? It's not working today
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!