Thicker phone with larger battery or skinny phone with small battery


Phone thickness  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Thicker phone with big batter or skinny phone with small battery?

    • Thicker phone with larger battery
      27
    • Skinny phone with smaller battery
      5


Recommended Posts

Am I the only one who would much rather have a much thicker phone with a large battery over a skinny phone? Sure you can get an extended battery but im not really a fan of using a third party addon to make my phone look like it has a tumor on its back. I would much rather have a phone that is more thick like 10-12mm with a much bigger battery over a phone that is 7mm with a little battery. The phones now are already huge at 4.5"+ anyways so the thickness wont really make much of a difference. Its already going to take up a bunch of space in my pocket because of the big screen so I would at least like to use that big screen to its fullest for longer if it means it needs to be thicker.

To me 3-5mm in phone thickness doesn't really matter, but when it comes to squeezing a battery into there those 3-5mm can seriously increase your battery size.

I agree on a larger battery. Problem is phone companies are in some race with themselves and they ignore us consumers. As a result, you get what they tell us we want and not what we actually want.

Someday keyboards will return to phones and larger capacity batteries will as well.

  • Like 2

As long as I can get a reasonable day's usage from a smartphone it doesn't bother me all that much. I tend to side with functionality over size though normally.

As long as it's not too thick, I definitely want a larger battery, considering 2mm more thickness can give twice the working time.

exactly, 2mm isn't going to really make any difference and I doubt most people would even be able to tell. Even if you were to lay two phones flat and ask people which is thinner you have to look really close and the final judgment would be "well that ones is a tiny bit more thin", which is correct, 2mm more thin, and that's hardly enough to make a difference in how it feels in your hand. That 2mm though can really increase your battery life.

Remember the old Nokia's that would last a week on a single charge? There's no reason why we can't make a phone like that again! Just tape 3 batteries together, make the phone thicker, and you have a week's worth of light use.

Battery life has been great on my current and last phone, and both have been on the thin side, so I'd rather have a thin device. More battery life isn't an advantage if current battery life is satisfactory!

Thicker, and even a bit extra to support a removable battery.

Hell, I'd want thicker even if it weren't for the extra battery life. My iPod touch is just too thin, it feels like it's going to slide out of my hand (people have been complaining about this with the iPhone 5 too, and I know someone with a Galaxy S who bought a protective case just to make it thick enough).

I charge my HTC One X each night (8 hours) - I know it doesn't need that much charge and at the end of the day its probably at about 60% but its important to me that my phone is at 100% at the start of day just in case, and like Im going to get up at 1am to unplug it.

I know its not the best method, I know its wasteful and probably a few ? more expensive but I need to know my phone is ready if I need it. My HTC Desire lasted very well for the 24 month contract i had it on, now its sleeps in an drawer in my desk.

I would welcome a chunkier phone if it gave me two days. I don't care how thin my phone is, as long as i can carry it in my trouser pocket.

I wouldn't mind my phone to be thicker with a better battery. I mean without a case on my phone it feels like it's too thin anyway. :p

Yeah, people brag about how nice their phone looks and how thin it is... then lock it in a huge thick ugly protector case. I never understood that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!