Recommended Posts

Our ISP allows us to download 250 GB per month.

When we reach the 250 GB monthly cap, our speed gets reduced.

According to this link, it's reduced to "256kb/s"

What speed is "256kb/s" in KB/s?

I am asking, because I thought "256kb/s" would be a quarter of a MB per second (I understand that would be KB/s but is "256kb/s" strictly kBITS/s?), but that is not what we're getting.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1111415-confused-with-kbs-and-kbs/
Share on other sites

It is marketing at its best. the 256kb/s means nothing to most people, including some people that understand technology. However, 256kb/s sounds better than 32 KB/s.

I thought that "256kb/s" is the same as "256 KB/s" - damn :(

I'm reading that as it'll be reduced to 256 kilobytes per second. It's just whoever typed it, didn't think about the difference between bits and bytes. I could be wrong, but at 256 kilobits per second, your connection would effectively had the rate of dial up, which, in my opinion, would be useless.

Lets translate if you want :)

First:

GB = Gigabyte

gb = Gigabit

KB = Kilobyte

kb = kilobit

1 GB = 8 gb

1 KB = 8 kb

1 GB = 1048576 KB

1 kb = 0.125 KB

Once we got that a bit ( :p ) out the way.....

250 GB = 262144000 KB

256 kb = 31.25 KB

I hope this cleared up some things and did not confuse you more :)

I'm reading that as it'll be reduced to 256 kilobytes per second. It's just whoever typed it, didn't think about the difference between bits and bytes. I could be wrong, but at 256 kilobits per second, your connection would effectively had the rate of dial up, which, in my opinion, would be useless.

hystorically connection speed has been rated in bits.

Dial up was 56Kbits/s and a little more with data compression (or less before 2000) which was far lower than 32KB/s.

I'm reading that as it'll be reduced to 256 kilobytes per second. It's just whoever typed it, didn't think about the difference between bits and bytes. I could be wrong, but at 256 kilobits per second, your connection would effectively had the rate of dial up, which, in my opinion, would be useless.

It is useless.

The person who typed it up DID not make a mistake for two reasons:

1: Thats how low it actually is

2: If they mistyped it, it would be false advertisement and lawsuit.

It is useless.

The person who typed it up DID not make a mistake for two reasons:

1: Thats how low it actually is

2: If they mistyped it, it would be false advertisement and lawsuit.

Anyway 256KB/s is still kinda high. You can download a 720p mkv file in around 5 or 6 hours at this speed. There would be no point to reduce the speed if people could still download HD movies in less than a day.

32KB/s is kinda low tough. 64KB/s would have been more resonable.

I have ran speed tests on various websites. Results are (down/up):

1.23 Mb/s / 0.104 Mb/s

276 kbps / 59 kbps

215.73 Kbps (0.2 Mbps) / 59.98 Kbps (0.1 Mbps)

243 kbps / 36 kbps

So yep, I'm restricted to 32 KB/s for the next week. Ouch.

Who would have thought we pay ?17.50 (not inc. line rental) for this connection :pinch:

Eh, either way, it'd make more sense if they were consistent with it, with Kbps = kilobits per second and KBps being kilobytes per second. On another note though, 250GB a month is a lot of data. I usually hit around 80-90GB a month on my DSL connection, and I download quite a bit of stuff weekly, not to mention Netflix and youtube regularly.

Better than 56Kbps....

My first internet connection was a 9600 text connection. We (me and my friends) had to use a hack and connect to the server using telnet and install a small nix app in our home folder on the server to access the internet connection of the server via our 9600 text connection using telnet. Ah those were the good ol days XD.

The cie never got us doing it rofl

Also note that sometime companies rate 1kbits/s as 1000bits/s while file download softwares will consider 1KB/s to be 1024bytes/s. So 256kbits/s might not be 32KB/s but 31.25KB/s

So you went over your 250GB already for this month? its only the 10th of the Month -- or does your month end on different days?

Im on comcast and they have a 250GB limit as well, and have never even gotten close to it.. Here are last few months of usage

post-14624-0-27947400-1349895404.jpg

I would look into better tracking of your usage, so if you do have some big downloads you want to do time them for near month end so if you do go over your only restricted for a couple of days at most.

So you went over your 250GB already for this month? its only the 10th of the Month -- or does your month end on different days?

Im on comcast and they have a 250GB limit as well, and have never even gotten close to it.. Here are last few months of usage

<image snipped>

I would look into better tracking of your usage, so if you do have some big downloads you want to do time them for near month end so if you do go over your only restricted for a couple of days at most.

We have two family members who use Netflix in two separate rooms, and they watch HD content each. I also review PC games, so have to download 15 GB of ISOs from our company weekly for this purpose alone.

We used 250 GB in 21 days.

To be fair, we have only had the connection for 3 weeks and we only found out last week that we can download as much as we want between 00:00 and 08:00 without it affecting the cap. Since we were never informed of this period (in fact, one person at the ISP said it was "unlimited at all times" and one said we'd only be dropped to 2Mbps and not 0.125Mbps), we are currently going through a complaints procedure with them.

They said "it was all over the website" but we ordered by phone. Just because we can look on the website, doesn't mean people should have to look at the website. Such conditions should be mentioned during the phone order, especially when asked (which we did).

So lets see 15x4 = 60 + Netflix bandwidth

http://support.netfl...de/87#gsc.tab=0

There are 3 settings to choose from:

  • Good quality (uses up to 0.3 GB per hour)
  • Better quality (uses up to 0.7 GB per hour)
  • Best quality (uses up to 1 GB per hour, or up to 2.3 GB per hour if watching HD)

So even at 2.3GB /hour your looking at in 3 weeks minus even your 60GB for the month your looking at what 80 hours of HD video to hit your limit..

Really you watched 80 hours of video in 3 weeks?

That's crazy dude! Might want to look on changing your video settings on netflix ;) Or bringing in another line.. Setup one for netflix only - so your looking at 250/2.3 or 108 hours of video a month. And then the other 250 you can use for internet and your isos you need to download.

I agree with you that they should of atleast mentioned looking at the website for their TOS and bandwidth restrictions. But to be honest it is up to the buyer understands limits, not the other way around. If when you ordered someone stated you had unlimited -- then sure you have a legit complaint.

They said "it was all over the website" but we ordered by phone. Just because we can look on the website, doesn't mean people should have to look at the website. Such conditions should be mentioned during the phone order, especially when asked (which we did).

An ISP saying it is all over the website is like a cable company saying it was all over the commercial. How do you get access to those things before you buy access to them. They can't expect you to get information from a source that requires their service to reach the source.

That's crazy dude! Might want to look on changing your video settings on netflix ;) Or bringing in another line.. Setup one for netflix only - so your looking at 250/2.3 or 108 hours of video a month. And then the other 250 you can use for internet and your isos you need to download.

And maybe get your job to pay for the extra line since it is for their profit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!