• 0

Need help making an "offline" copy of a website I'm a member of


Question

Hi, everyone.

I'm a member of a private group, one that costs many thousands of dollars to join. The person that started the group and runs it, I'll call "Bob", isn't very technical at all. He hired someone to create a website for members. Each member has their own username and password. As far as I know, for at least the last few years Microsoft SharePoint Server has been used. I do not know any more specifics about what the website is running on.

"Bob" has always encouraged people to download things from the website here and there since content is always changing and in case anything ever happened to the server. Well, this website has many areas (called "Sites"), thousands of forum/blog type postings, and hundreds or thousands of links, files, and folders scattered all over the place. Yes, I could manually make local folders and download things, but that would be a nightmare and quite difficult.

So, all along over the last year or so, I've thought about just making an "offline" copy and figured I would use WinHTTrack, which I have known about for many years. I went to do it about a week ago, with the intention of backing up the site to a new Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB drive. I think the website is only maybe 100GB. Anyway, I am getting "Access Denied" and "Unauthorized" errors (if I look at the logs), which don't make any sense when I know I am using the correct username and password that I use to login. I am even copying and pasting from my password manager.

Here is the log file generated when telling WinHTTrack to copy http://www.WEBSITE.com :

HTTrack3.46+htsswf+htsjava launched on Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:12:40 at http://USERNAME:PASS...www.WEBSITE.com +*.png +*.gif +*.jpg +*.css +*.js -

ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar

(winhttrack -WC2%Pns2u1%s%uN0%I0p7DaK0c2R3H0%kf2A25000%c1%f#f -F "Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)" -%F "<!-- Mirrored from %s%s by HTTrack Website

Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2010], %s -->" -%l "en, en, *" http://USERNAME:PASS...www.WEBSITE.com -O1 I:\WEBSITE_BACKUP_FOLDER +*.png +*.gif +*.jpg

+*.css +*.js -ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar )

Information, Warnings and Errors reported for this mirror:

note: the hts-log.txt file, and hts-cache folder, may contain sensitive information,

such as username/password authentication for websites mirrored in this project

do not share these files/folders if you want these information to remain private

14:12:42 Error: "Access denied" (401) at link USERNAME:[email protected]/ (from primary/primary)

14:12:42 Info: No data seems to have been transfered during this session! : restoring previous one!

Here is the log file generated when telling WinHTTrack to copy http://www.WEBSITE.com/default.aspx :

HTTrack3.46+htsswf+htsjava launched on Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:16:53 at http://USERNAME:PASS...om/default.aspx +*.png +*.gif +*.jpg +*.css +*.js

-ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar

(winhttrack -WC2%Pns2u1%s%uN0%I0p7DaK0c2R3H0%kf2A25000%c1%f#f -F "Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)" -%F "<!-- Mirrored from %s%s by HTTrack Website

Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2010], %s -->" -%l "en, en, *" http://USERNAME:PASS...om/default.aspx -O1 I:\WEBSITE_BACKUP_FOLDER +*.png

+*.gif +*.jpg +*.css +*.js -ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar )

Information, Warnings and Errors reported for this mirror:

note: the hts-log.txt file, and hts-cache folder, may contain sensitive information,

such as username/password authentication for websites mirrored in this project

do not share these files/folders if you want these information to remain private

14:16:56 Error: "Unauthorized" (401) at link USERNAME:[email protected]/default.aspx (from primary/primary)

14:16:56 Info: No data seems to have been transfered during this session! : restoring previous one!

Attached you will find an a screen-shot of the error I get via a pop-up window (for WEBSITE.com or WEBSITE.com/default.aspx) as well as screen-shots showing the various tabs of the Preferences.

So, I was wondering if there is a problem in general with using WinHTTrack with SharePoint websites? Does anyone have any experience making offline copies of SharePoint websites? Any suggestions? Other software that someone has used for SharePoint websites?

Thanks in advance for any feedback and/or help...

-JayZJay

post-157395-0-82868200-1350509533.jpgpost-157395-0-21688800-1350509544.jpgpost-157395-0-71445100-1350509545.jpgpost-157395-0-52917400-1350509547.jpgpost-157395-0-78965000-1350509548.jpgpost-157395-0-17525600-1350509550.jpgpost-157395-0-44106700-1350509551.jpgpost-157395-0-70143500-1350509552.jpgpost-157395-0-07401200-1350509554.jpgpost-157395-0-25737800-1350509555.jpgpost-157395-0-60818300-1350509556.jpgpost-157395-0-82880800-1350509557.jpg

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Why not just do it at a server level backup. I never had any issues with the standard options in httrack in getting websites. Or just FTP into the server and DL the entire website from there. If it uses PHP I believe you still will need a local server to run the website.

  • 0

The server is not physically here, nor do I as only a member have any type of admin access to do a server level backup. As far as I know or can tell, there is not any type of ftp access available to anyone. If there is, I do not know the URL and "Bob", being a control freak, is not going to provide that information to any of us members.

  • 0

well from this

"14:12:42 Error: "Access denied" (401) at link USERNAME:[email protected]/ (from primary/primary)"

Looks to me that you can not use that form of url to auth to the site? If sharepoint its prob using ntml auth, and they prob have basic auth off so you can not do that sort of url to auth.

your never going to download anything if site requires auth to access. I would verify that you can use that url your using just in your browser address bar to access the site. If not then do a bit of google for how to use ntml auth with httrack, the old school was was to use a proxy with httrack that would do the ntml auth for you and then all the connections from httrack would use the local proxy you were running on the same machine. Have not play with httrack in years and years - maybe they support direct ntml auth now?

  • 0

"Bob" runs a website where he encourages people to download, yes sounds very legit...

Try not assuming. It is a research group. We study alternative health, banking, law, trusts, estates, and other topics. The only thing on the site is PDFs, Word docs, discussion on various topics, private presentations recorded from group meetings, webinars, etc. Those are the things on the site and there is a ton of it going back years. "Bob" encourages us to download and keep copies of stuff because 1) the site constantly changes, 2) there are times when you are in a law library or other place without Internet access and cannot access the site, and 3) "Bob" isn't very technical and he loses things, deletes stuff, etc -- so having our own backup copies is certainly a good idea just in case a problem arises.

  • 0

Try not assuming. It is a research group. We study alternative health, banking, law, trusts, estates, and other topics. The only thing on the site is PDFs, Word docs, discussion on various topics, private presentations recorded from group meetings, webinars, etc. Those are the things on the site and there is a ton of it going back years. "Bob" encourages us to download and keep copies of stuff because 1) the site constantly changes, 2) there are times when you are in a law library or other place without Internet access and cannot access the site, and 3) "Bob" isn't very technical and he loses things, deletes stuff, etc -- so having our own backup copies is certainly a good idea just in case a problem arises.

i dont know how to help, but this sounds really cool. Why can't we know who bob is, or this website?

  • 0

Try not assuming. It is a research group. We study alternative health, banking, law, trusts, estates, and other topics. The only thing on the site is PDFs, Word docs, discussion on various topics, private presentations recorded from group meetings, webinars, etc. Those are the things on the site and there is a ton of it going back years. "Bob" encourages us to download and keep copies of stuff because 1) the site constantly changes, 2) there are times when you are in a law library or other place without Internet access and cannot access the site, and 3) "Bob" isn't very technical and he loses things, deletes stuff, etc -- so having our own backup copies is certainly a good idea just in case a problem arises.

All i have gotten from this whole thread is bob is a complete and utter idiot that runs a website that people seem to pay alot of money to join. If you are paying him money to join this secret website and he has no clue on what he's doing then he should hire someone to take care of the tech side of things including backups to another hard drive/server (after all you say your paying alot of money why can he not have more than one server?). If there are so many files like you claim then the best thing would be to get limited ftp access to the downloads directory (can access and download that directory and thats it).

In all honesty you would be better talking to this bob and telling him to hire someone for back up reasons, as for the offline content maybe he does not want that because the information could end up being on the internet for free instead of people paying him to gain access. As you said things change and people leave things laying about which soon gets onto the internet,.

Anyway im out of this thread, i personally think what you are doing is wrong you are a member of a site and nothing more.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't use Edge, I don't even use Windows these days as my main driver. Mac these days I use and Zen browser
    • Apple releases iOS 26.5.2 with dozens of security fixes for iPhone by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has released iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2, which are security-only updates for the iPhone and the iPad. The update brings a bunch of security fixes for WebKit, WebRTC, WebKit Storage, WebKit Canvas, Web Extensions, libxslt, IOGPUFamily, and even the kernel. Some of the WebKit issues that were fixed could have allowed malicious web content to disclose sensitive user information, exfiltrate cross-origin data, crash Safari, or process restricted web content outside the browser sandbox. One notable WebKit Storage bug could let a malicious website to silently hijack clipboard data, according to Apple’s description. Other WebKit-related flaws involved memory corruption, use-after-free bugs, type confusion, out-of-bounds writes, permissions problems, and cross-origin data handling issues. The update also includes three kernel-related fixes. Apple says one of the flaws could let an app write kernel memory or cause unexpected system termination, while another may leak sensitive kernel state, and a third could corrupt kernel memory or terminate the system unexpectedly. Although Apple hasn't described them as remote web attacks, kernel bugs are still important to fix, as they can sometimes be chained with other flaws to escape app or browser restrictions. The updates are available for iPhone 11 and later, iPad Pro 12.9-inch 3rd generation and later, iPad Pro 11-inch 1st generation and later, iPad Air 3rd generation and later, iPad 8th generation and later, and iPad mini 5th generation and later. Similar security fixes also came with the latest update to macOS Tahoe 26.5.2, which Apple released on the same day. That overlap is not surprising, since Safari, WebKit, WebRTC, and other underlying components are shared across Apple’s platforms. Users are advised to update their devices sooner rather than later as these security fixes are crucial. iOS 26.5.2 can be installed from Settings > General > Software Update. Similarly, Mac users can find macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 through System Settings > General > Software Update.
    • Taken them long enough, that is one good thing. I still refuse to have a Whatsapp account, because it still need a phone number to have an account. don't want to give Meta my phone number
    • Good think I still have SDRAM and FP RAM sitting around.
    • Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker with Google apps is now at its lowest price with 47% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker at its all-time low price with a 47% discount. The device features an AMOLED touchscreen display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 that should offer improved scratch resistance and durability. The Charge 6 is equipped with a range of sensors including an optical heart rate sensor, a 3-axis accelerometer, built-in GPS with GLONASS support, red and infrared sensors for SpO2 monitoring, a skin temperature sensor, an ambient light sensor, a vibration motor, NFC, and multipurpose electrical sensors compatible with the ECG and EDA Scan apps. Heart rate is recorded every second during exercise tracking and every five seconds during normal daily use. The device requires the Google Health app for setup and synchronisation. Furthermore, Bluetooth provides wireless connectivity for syncing and communication with devices running Apple iOS 16.4 or later and Android 11.0 or later. The tracker stores up to 7 days of minute-by-minute activity data and retains daily activity totals for the previous 30 days. In terms of water resistance, the Fitbit Charge 6 has a 5 ATM rating that should make it suitable for swimming and water activities. The tracker operates in temperatures ranging from 14°F to 113°F and at altitudes of up to 28,000 feet. Moreover, the included Infinity band is made from a flexible silicone material and features a loop-and-peg fastening. The small band fits wrists measuring 5.1 to 6.7 inches, while the large band fits wrists measuring 6.7 to 8.3 inches. Both small and large bands are included in the box. When it comes to battery performance, the Fitbit Charge 6 should deliver up to 7 days of battery life under typical usage conditions. Features such as the Always-On Display, built-in GPS, and SpO2 monitoring increase power consumption and may require more frequent charging. The rechargeable lithium-polymer battery should take approximately two hours to charge from empty to full. Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker with Google Apps: $85.45 (Amazon US) - 47% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!