• 0

Need help making an "offline" copy of a website I'm a member of


Question

Hi, everyone.

I'm a member of a private group, one that costs many thousands of dollars to join. The person that started the group and runs it, I'll call "Bob", isn't very technical at all. He hired someone to create a website for members. Each member has their own username and password. As far as I know, for at least the last few years Microsoft SharePoint Server has been used. I do not know any more specifics about what the website is running on.

"Bob" has always encouraged people to download things from the website here and there since content is always changing and in case anything ever happened to the server. Well, this website has many areas (called "Sites"), thousands of forum/blog type postings, and hundreds or thousands of links, files, and folders scattered all over the place. Yes, I could manually make local folders and download things, but that would be a nightmare and quite difficult.

So, all along over the last year or so, I've thought about just making an "offline" copy and figured I would use WinHTTrack, which I have known about for many years. I went to do it about a week ago, with the intention of backing up the site to a new Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB drive. I think the website is only maybe 100GB. Anyway, I am getting "Access Denied" and "Unauthorized" errors (if I look at the logs), which don't make any sense when I know I am using the correct username and password that I use to login. I am even copying and pasting from my password manager.

Here is the log file generated when telling WinHTTrack to copy http://www.WEBSITE.com :

HTTrack3.46+htsswf+htsjava launched on Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:12:40 at http://USERNAME:PASS...www.WEBSITE.com +*.png +*.gif +*.jpg +*.css +*.js -

ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar

(winhttrack -WC2%Pns2u1%s%uN0%I0p7DaK0c2R3H0%kf2A25000%c1%f#f -F "Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)" -%F "<!-- Mirrored from %s%s by HTTrack Website

Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2010], %s -->" -%l "en, en, *" http://USERNAME:PASS...www.WEBSITE.com -O1 I:\WEBSITE_BACKUP_FOLDER +*.png +*.gif +*.jpg

+*.css +*.js -ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar )

Information, Warnings and Errors reported for this mirror:

note: the hts-log.txt file, and hts-cache folder, may contain sensitive information,

such as username/password authentication for websites mirrored in this project

do not share these files/folders if you want these information to remain private

14:12:42 Error: "Access denied" (401) at link USERNAME:[email protected]/ (from primary/primary)

14:12:42 Info: No data seems to have been transfered during this session! : restoring previous one!

Here is the log file generated when telling WinHTTrack to copy http://www.WEBSITE.com/default.aspx :

HTTrack3.46+htsswf+htsjava launched on Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:16:53 at http://USERNAME:PASS...om/default.aspx +*.png +*.gif +*.jpg +*.css +*.js

-ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar

(winhttrack -WC2%Pns2u1%s%uN0%I0p7DaK0c2R3H0%kf2A25000%c1%f#f -F "Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)" -%F "<!-- Mirrored from %s%s by HTTrack Website

Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2010], %s -->" -%l "en, en, *" http://USERNAME:PASS...om/default.aspx -O1 I:\WEBSITE_BACKUP_FOLDER +*.png

+*.gif +*.jpg +*.css +*.js -ad.doubleclick.net/* -mime:application/foobar )

Information, Warnings and Errors reported for this mirror:

note: the hts-log.txt file, and hts-cache folder, may contain sensitive information,

such as username/password authentication for websites mirrored in this project

do not share these files/folders if you want these information to remain private

14:16:56 Error: "Unauthorized" (401) at link USERNAME:[email protected]/default.aspx (from primary/primary)

14:16:56 Info: No data seems to have been transfered during this session! : restoring previous one!

Attached you will find an a screen-shot of the error I get via a pop-up window (for WEBSITE.com or WEBSITE.com/default.aspx) as well as screen-shots showing the various tabs of the Preferences.

So, I was wondering if there is a problem in general with using WinHTTrack with SharePoint websites? Does anyone have any experience making offline copies of SharePoint websites? Any suggestions? Other software that someone has used for SharePoint websites?

Thanks in advance for any feedback and/or help...

-JayZJay

post-157395-0-82868200-1350509533.jpgpost-157395-0-21688800-1350509544.jpgpost-157395-0-71445100-1350509545.jpgpost-157395-0-52917400-1350509547.jpgpost-157395-0-78965000-1350509548.jpgpost-157395-0-17525600-1350509550.jpgpost-157395-0-44106700-1350509551.jpgpost-157395-0-70143500-1350509552.jpgpost-157395-0-07401200-1350509554.jpgpost-157395-0-25737800-1350509555.jpgpost-157395-0-60818300-1350509556.jpgpost-157395-0-82880800-1350509557.jpg

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Why not just do it at a server level backup. I never had any issues with the standard options in httrack in getting websites. Or just FTP into the server and DL the entire website from there. If it uses PHP I believe you still will need a local server to run the website.

  • 0

The server is not physically here, nor do I as only a member have any type of admin access to do a server level backup. As far as I know or can tell, there is not any type of ftp access available to anyone. If there is, I do not know the URL and "Bob", being a control freak, is not going to provide that information to any of us members.

  • 0

well from this

"14:12:42 Error: "Access denied" (401) at link USERNAME:[email protected]/ (from primary/primary)"

Looks to me that you can not use that form of url to auth to the site? If sharepoint its prob using ntml auth, and they prob have basic auth off so you can not do that sort of url to auth.

your never going to download anything if site requires auth to access. I would verify that you can use that url your using just in your browser address bar to access the site. If not then do a bit of google for how to use ntml auth with httrack, the old school was was to use a proxy with httrack that would do the ntml auth for you and then all the connections from httrack would use the local proxy you were running on the same machine. Have not play with httrack in years and years - maybe they support direct ntml auth now?

  • 0

"Bob" runs a website where he encourages people to download, yes sounds very legit...

Try not assuming. It is a research group. We study alternative health, banking, law, trusts, estates, and other topics. The only thing on the site is PDFs, Word docs, discussion on various topics, private presentations recorded from group meetings, webinars, etc. Those are the things on the site and there is a ton of it going back years. "Bob" encourages us to download and keep copies of stuff because 1) the site constantly changes, 2) there are times when you are in a law library or other place without Internet access and cannot access the site, and 3) "Bob" isn't very technical and he loses things, deletes stuff, etc -- so having our own backup copies is certainly a good idea just in case a problem arises.

  • 0

Try not assuming. It is a research group. We study alternative health, banking, law, trusts, estates, and other topics. The only thing on the site is PDFs, Word docs, discussion on various topics, private presentations recorded from group meetings, webinars, etc. Those are the things on the site and there is a ton of it going back years. "Bob" encourages us to download and keep copies of stuff because 1) the site constantly changes, 2) there are times when you are in a law library or other place without Internet access and cannot access the site, and 3) "Bob" isn't very technical and he loses things, deletes stuff, etc -- so having our own backup copies is certainly a good idea just in case a problem arises.

i dont know how to help, but this sounds really cool. Why can't we know who bob is, or this website?

  • 0

Try not assuming. It is a research group. We study alternative health, banking, law, trusts, estates, and other topics. The only thing on the site is PDFs, Word docs, discussion on various topics, private presentations recorded from group meetings, webinars, etc. Those are the things on the site and there is a ton of it going back years. "Bob" encourages us to download and keep copies of stuff because 1) the site constantly changes, 2) there are times when you are in a law library or other place without Internet access and cannot access the site, and 3) "Bob" isn't very technical and he loses things, deletes stuff, etc -- so having our own backup copies is certainly a good idea just in case a problem arises.

All i have gotten from this whole thread is bob is a complete and utter idiot that runs a website that people seem to pay alot of money to join. If you are paying him money to join this secret website and he has no clue on what he's doing then he should hire someone to take care of the tech side of things including backups to another hard drive/server (after all you say your paying alot of money why can he not have more than one server?). If there are so many files like you claim then the best thing would be to get limited ftp access to the downloads directory (can access and download that directory and thats it).

In all honesty you would be better talking to this bob and telling him to hire someone for back up reasons, as for the offline content maybe he does not want that because the information could end up being on the internet for free instead of people paying him to gain access. As you said things change and people leave things laying about which soon gets onto the internet,.

Anyway im out of this thread, i personally think what you are doing is wrong you are a member of a site and nothing more.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The only reason I want to know where you from is because if you are not from the U.K, then why should you care what we in the U.K do or don't do? Racist I am not, I am fed up with the amount coming over here and feel they can come over here and think we need to support them. Do you know how much it costs this country to support these people coming over here? Even when we give them a place to live it is not good enough. We had a barge that was being used to house immigrants, oh but that was not good enough. A mate said to me at the time, when he was homeless, he would have been happy to live on the barge, instead of ending up sleeping on a bench on the beach. I am not scared to say what my family heritage is, unlike you who is scared to say where they are from or where they live. Father side U.S, mother side Wales, still have family living in the U.S. A mate who sadly died a few years ago, had a load of people from different races recording in his studio, I got on with all of them. Skin colour don't bother me, where they are from don't bother me. Religion don't bother me as long as they don't push it onto me and it is not crazy stuff. I am not religious. But if you are not living in the U.K, then why should you care if we are in the E.U or not? This the problem, too many people poking their noses into where it don't belong. But you believe what you believe, if you think I am racist, then be it, I really do not care. Just grow a pair
    • If he hasn't been able to figure that out, then why is he obsessed with tariffs? Because that's one of the most prominent tools to level the playing field when you have high cost of labor.
    • Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5102558, KB5095615 Setup and Recovery updates by Sayan Sen This past week Microsoft released the newest preview update (C-release) under KB5095093. Alongside those, Microsoft also released new dynamic updates. For those who may not know, dynamic updates bring improvements to the Windows Recovery process in the form of Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) updates, which are also called Safe OS updates. The dynamic updates also affect the Setup file binaries in the form of Setup updates. These Dynamic Update packages are meant to be applied to existing Windows images prior to their deployment. Dynamic Updates also help preserve Language Pack (LP) and Features on Demand (FODs) content during the upgrade process. VBScript, for example, is currently an FOD on Windows 11 24H2. This time both recovery and setup updates were released for Windows 11. The company writes: "KB5095186: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 26H1: June 23, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.28000.2335. KB5102558: Setup Dynamic Update for Windows 11, versions 24H2 and 25H2: June 23, 2026 This update makes improvements to Windows setup binaries or any files that setup uses for feature updates in Windows 11, version 24H2 and Windows 11, version 25H2. KB5095615: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, versions 24H2 and 25H2: June 23, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.26100.8737." Microsoft notes that both the Recovery and Setup updates will be downloaded and installed automatically via the Windows Update channel.
    • The high cost of labor and operating within the US. Donald hasn't been able to figure that out--pathetic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!