Dark Souls is the worst console port


Recommended Posts

When Dark Souls first came out on consoles, I played it, and loved every minute of it. It was a new experience for me, as I was not familiar with this genre and hadn't played much, or any game like it before.

Now, when it was out for PC, I was extremely happy, because I wanted to play more and if possible, finish it. (Not too many games in my system have the privilage to be finished :p )

So I went out a few days ago and bought it. Installed it, and then finished my assignment earlier so that I would be able to play it in the night.

So when I started it, the very first thing to notice was that it had those XBOX buttons, and not the keyboard ones, at the bottom, for page navigation thing. No worries. Somehow, I managed to get through and started the game

And there it was. After the initial promo video, I was struck by surprise that how bad it really was.

The controls are just plain awful. Even when I wanted to pause the game, I had to hit almost every single key on the keyboard to fing the one that pauses the game.

My thoughts exactly match this comment

You want the game for your platform? Oh ok, they say..but we really can't be bothered with much else, because we're inexperienced. Experienced enough though to charge full price for an ass-backwards menu system, useless mouse controls and woeful graphics options, with nothing really to support the best gaming platform. We seriously can't be bothered hiring someone with experience with PC games in all that time. Some modder who can satisfy the legion of steam users. Oh and heres Games for Windows slapped on to top it off. Here's your damn game, make of it what you will while we take your damn money

After five frustrating minutes, I quit it by Alt+F4 and un-installed it instantly.

Also, I would like to add that this is not the first time, I am playing a game that was ported to PC from consoles. I've, infact, played many, but this one, unfourtunately supersedes them

I'd rather want a game to stay console exclusive than turning it into a nightmare

While the standard version is pretty terrible, still playable. Also this game should be played with a controller anyway.

You can mod the game quite easily which makes the game more playable.

DSfix is a must - http://blog.metaclassofnil.com/?tag=dsfix

Then head over to Dark Souls Nexus to get other mods - http://darksouls.nexusmods.com

I believe there is even a mod the replaces the xbox button inputs with keyboard inputs.

If I remember correctly, the developers stated that they didn't have any PC development experience. But they still delivered a playable game to the fans. I commend them for listening to the fans and giving them something which is certainly better than nothing. It falls well below my standards for a PC game but that doesn't mean other people won't enjoy it.

If I remember correctly, the developers stated that they didn't have any PC development experience. But they still delivered a playable game to the fans. I commend them for listening to the fans and giving them something which is certainly better than nothing. It falls well below my standards for a PC game but that doesn't mean other people won't enjoy it.

If they were aware that it was going to be a such a ****ty port, it should have been free then.

Dark Souls works perfectly fine? Not sure what people are complaining about. Plays exactly like the console version.

:|

I essentially agree with the OP. If you honestly can't offer a good, or even decent, quality PC port then you shouldn't bother with it at all. Accept console exclusivity. This is about knowing your limits and your capabilities. From Software over-reached and the shabby port is the proof.

It's a real shame a game like Dark Souls, which has had universal praise, now has this black-mark against them.

:|

I essentially agree with the OP. If you honestly can't offer a good, or even decent, quality PC port then you shouldn't bother with it at all. Accept console exclusivity. This is about knowing your limits and your capabilities. From Software over-reached and the shabby port is the proof.

It's a real shame a game like Dark Souls, which has had universal praise, now has this black-mark against them.

Except there is absolutely no difference between the PC and console versions of the game. They play EXACTLY THE SAME.

Except there is absolutely no difference between the PC and console versions of the game. They play EXACTLY THE SAME.

:rolleyes: People don't choose to game on their PCs to have the exact same experience as on a console.

In GameSpy's review of the PC version, the port was referred to as "shabby", citing the game's limit of 30 frames per second, poor mouse and keyboard controls, and nonadjustable resolution,

:rolleyes: People don't choose to game on their PCs to have the exact same experience as on a console.

So according to your qoute... exactly like the console version. Now we are knocking companies for consistancy? Jesus christ has the gaming community become retarded? It's a no win environment. No wonder companies aren't listening to customers anymore. Damned if you, damned if you don't.

Holy hell that is one hell of an unplayable game O.o

Just googled this,

http://segmentnext.com/2012/08/24/dark-souls-pc-crashes-low-fps-fix-controls-errors-freezes-and-gfwl-fixes/

"Make sure you don?t have two hard-drives and especially an external second hard drive as a general program drive. If you have it and you are trying to install Dark Souls on your secondary hard-drive, edit the registry to make that drive your primary install location."

I would try it for the lolz, but alas my hardware is about 4 times under the sys req.

So according to your qoute... exactly like the console version. Now we are knocking companies for consistancy? Jesus christ has the gaming community become retarded? It's a no win environment. No wonder companies aren't listening to customers anymore. Damned if you, damned if you don't.

You can't reason with Die-hard PC Gamers, they're some of the most stuck up, elitist people on the internet.

1336651881895.jpg

From Software has never made a PC game before muchless ported a console game to a PC. The game is a port of Xbox version which is a port of the PS3 version. With that, they did strongly recommend using a controller instead of a mouse and keyboard since the game was originally designed for a controller.

I wouldn't call it the worst port. It's mouse and keyboard controls aren't any good. I have several gamepads for my PC so that wasn't an issue. You got to let go of the mouse and keyboard, it's not optimal for certain genres.

So according to your qoute... exactly like the console version. Now we are knocking companies for consistancy? Jesus christ has the gaming community become retarded? It's a no win environment. No wonder companies aren't listening to customers anymore. Damned if you, damned if you don't.

This isn't simply a "OMG WE HAZ 2 UZE CONTROLLA!?!" issue. There were a raft of issues with the PC release. If they felt they couldn't bring a half-way decent port to the PC then they shouldn't have bothered. The community had to offer basic **** like changing the resolution. WTF!?

You've completely missed the point. I'm not surprised.

You can't reason with Die-hard PC Gamers, they're some of the most stuck up, elitist people on the internet.

I'm not a die-hard PC gamer. I just think it sucks that game companies completely phone in development for the PC platform. If you're forking out a substantial amount of cash for a game you expect some rudimentary features and compatibility.

Your comment added nothing and was entirely arrogant. Oh, like you're accusing PC gamers of being. Interesting.

I'm not a die-hard PC gamer. I just think it sucks that game companies completely phone in development for the PC platform. If you're forking out a substantial amount of cash for a game you expect some rudimentary features and compatibility.

Your comment added nothing and was entirely arrogant. Oh, like you're accusing PC gamers of being. Interesting.

I was referring to the idea that this game being on par with the console version "not being good enough" was arrogant.

Yup, damn us for having higher standards or actually expecting it to run decently on our platform. Even with a controller this port stinks and requires the community to be playable. Tobac's statement that its the same (which it isn't) on the console and PC so its consistent rather than unoptimized is laughable.

Its a frustrating enough game at times to not have technology issues compound that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!